<폭염에도 에어컨 없이 28도…이 아파트 ‘블라인드’ 창밖에 달렸네> #에너지 #에너지제로 https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/environment/1271683.html

Channel
<인문 상식과 정보 채널
@saramgal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,152subscribers
-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001244173305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saramgal |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saramgal |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 06:42 | 2,152 | +2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 2,150 | -7 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 2,157 | -1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 2,158 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 2,162 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 2,165 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 2,173 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 2,174 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 2,178 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 2,182 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 2,184 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 2,186 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 2,190 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 2,191 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 2,191 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 80.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
<‘AI로 만든 #음악’ 이젠 #저작권 인정> #AI https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25450832
<오락용 차 바퀴에 깔려 떼죽음... 멸종위기종 물고기의 수난> https://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/Series/series_premium_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0003253747
<한국 #갯벌 아래 1만 년 동안 쌓인 것> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDSa5yDlokA 마침, 어제 올려드린, 세계유산위원회에서 한국의 갯벌이 추가 등재된 것의 의미와 갯벌의 중요성에 대한 내용이 있어 잇달아 올려 드립니다.
<부산 세계유산위원회서 ‘한국의 #갯벌’ 더 넓어졌다···여수·고흥·무안·서산 추가> https://www.khan.co.kr/article/202607251229001 한국에서 '공식적'인 갯벌의 수가 늘어났다는 것이 아니라 한국에서 '#유네스코 #세계유산'에 올라간 갯벌의 수가 늘어났다는 내용입니다.
<배재고가 배운 건 결국 '위기관리'였다> https://www.thecolumnist.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4920
(일반적인 비중이라기 보다는 우리 채널 구독자의 성향이겠습니다만,···)AI 사용에 대해, 생각보다도 대체로 긍정적으로 생각하신다는 분이 압도적으로 많네요. 혹시 다른 생각을 가진 분들께 궁금한 건 없으신가요? (의견, 질문 등의 댓글은 원 설문 아래에 남겨 주시기 바랍니다. ^^)
<경주 신라 소녀 무덤 장례식, 유네스코 전문가들 앞에서 재현됐다> https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/culture/culture_general/1269044.html
<미 외교街 흔든 '꺾이지 않는 교민의 마음'> https://www.thecolumnist.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4793
설문 기한이 하루 정도 남았습니다. 다른 분들은 어떤 선택을 했는지 궁금하지 않으신가요? ^^
<감정에도 냄새가 있다…개와 말이 먼저 알아챈 사람의 스트레스> https://www.dongascience.com/ko/news/78974
<‘자운대’ 대학교 아닙니다…부대 별칭 ‘○○대’도 일본 제국주의 잔재> https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/politics/defense/1268732.html
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saramgal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cheonjiilbo · 19,743
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“<인문 상식과 정보 채널” (@saramgal), 2,152 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saramgal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.