7 measurements spanning 19 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,105–3,146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 22:23
3,110
-4
24 Aug 2026, 03:47
3,114
-6
20 Aug 2026, 06:36
3,120
-12
14 Aug 2026, 00:14
3,132
-5
10 Aug 2026, 19:18
3,137
-4
7 Aug 2026, 11:31
3,141
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:20
3,141
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.8%
avg views ÷ 3,110 subscribers
Avg views / post
801
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (29 June 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
3,205
Reactions total
150
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
602 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
461
76.6%
🐳
88
14.6%
custom 5397911405804412612
53
8.80%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 602reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 20 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sanloran_fx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Кстати занятный факт, в этом году вообще не торговал пропы.
Последние пейаут был в декабре прошлого года после чего за отсутствие активности потерял все последние лайвы полностью перейдя на личку.
Думаю, в ближайшие дни добавлю пару акков, так сказать, откроем сезон. Хочется посмотреть насколько проп индустрия сейчас в очке находится.
Пару дней подряд пытался набрать XAU, да и ситуации были подходящие - но получилось забрать идею только сегодня. Итог 10%.
15m - https://www.tradingview.com/x/qxA0OfLV/
1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/jpomwb1e/
В обоях случаях зажимал на реакции после работы цены с SSL ну и разумеется смотрел на положение внутри DR. Лонги старался брать в районе 025 HTF DR.
Каждый день одно и тоже....
Вчера еще по фунту в штан…
Вчера думал над своей эволюцией торговли.
2023 год. Каждый вход в сделку расценивается как целое событие. Ощущение будто за тобой наблюдает весь мир. Чек Лист валидации идеи размером с методичку для пилотов Боинга. Учет сессий, тайминги, циклы. 5 активов для работы. В работе все ТФ от 1W до 1m. Дичайший расфокус.
2024 год. Каждая сделка словно вода проходящая через фильтр - имеет многоуровневую систему очистки. Чек…
Фунт сеня, стало быть, подвел. Но под конец дня затащили. Часть убытков покрыл и ладно.
15m - https://www.tradingview.com/x/R0X4f5Ko/
1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/jjYObbPW/
Первый вход многих подъебал, хотя честно говоря, он был достаточно сомнительный в силу того что находился в 075 HTF DR. Иными словами - мы лонговали в премии. Верх безумия.
Второй же, идеальный пример синхрона:
4h ff + 025 HTF DR
Хороши…
Со временем понимаешь, что трейдинг, все же, странное занятие.
Вроде бы, приходишь сюда чтобы понять рынок а в итоге осознаешь, что рынок все это время учил тебя понимать самого себя.
И чем дольше торгуешь, тем сильнее понимаешь: рынок, может, ты и не обязан научиться понимать до конца.
А вот себя - придётся.
YouTube | Chat | TG |
Не мог пройти мимо GBP. Не идеально вышло, но 10% дало.
30m - https://www.tradingview.com/x/Wp6Hoc2r/
5m - https://www.tradingview.com/x/iiCdFdua/
Утонченная работа с SSL внутри 4h FVG не оставила шансам шортам. Вот теперь неделя точно закрыта.
Чтобы руки не болели делай каждое утро одно и тоже упражнение:
Находим Фрактал (HTF)
Ждем реакцию от его снятия
Входим
15m - https://www.tradingview.com/x/tspdhnas/
1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/F3aITkWb/
5m - https://www.tradingview.com/x/C278W3fw/
XAU на +11%. До конца недели вне рынка.
XAU +13%
Чистая классика. Входил от подснятия HTF BSL внутри 1h FVG 05 с таргетом на ближайший структурный лой.
5m - https://www.tradingview.com/x/bFPjjBPA/
30m - https://www.tradingview.com/x/GoihnEv0/
Торговый день чисто за час закрыл.
GBP +17%
Только ленивый не брал. В качестве аргументов для входа использовались:
4h FVG 05 trigger + 1h BSL. Лтф в данной ситуации не использовал, так агрессивно сняли BSL что в целом, понятно было уже и на 1h.
1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/H2jFy0ow/
5m entry - https://www.tradingview.com/x/wUkI4LGv/
Рынок начинает приходить в себя потому судя по всему будем понемногу возвращаться в работу 🫡
GBP +13%
Не планировал вообще что-то брать сегодня, но это было слишком очевидно.
Нажал и забыл.
1h - https://www.tradingview.com/x/SyjOCr1P/
5m (entry) - https://www.tradingview.com/x/kB9rcMMV/
Аргумент для входа: Входил от работы с HTF BSL в области 075 HTF DR. Зажимал от 5м, после формирования локальной работы с BSL. Логика 075 - 025 в идеальном исполнении.
Вот и миновал летний экватор. Я бы даже сказал - полтора последних месяца пролетели почти незаметно.
Уже на протяжении многих лет взял себе за правило летом не работать, но что в прошлом году что и в этом - практически не отхожу от ПК. Жизнь порой любит подшутить надо мной и подкинуть пару интересных идей в самый разгар отдыха 😂
Пока что форекс не дает чего-то интересного в плане сильных ХТФ идей, а ЛТФ я ебал торг…
🔥62custom 53979114058044126125
Signed Леонид Санлоран
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sanloran_fx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sanloran_fx” (@sanloran_fx), 3,110 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanloran_fx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.