Channel
@salsatekila
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,657subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001160243375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @salsatekila |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/salsatekila |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 7,657 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 7,665 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 7,670 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 7,677 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 7,677 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (31 March 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,920 |
| Reactions total | 128 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
529 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 529 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 529reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Not much to add re: BTC. I do think we saw capitulation in late June, and that seller exhaustion was found there. This week we get further evidence to strengthen that case. The Trumps sell more BTC, Saylor sells more BTC after floating around billions in potential further sales, and Coldcard gets hacked for over $100M, which is IMO the scariest event for the space since the COVID crash (being able to securely own you…
👍22
if you're into DEXes: https://x.com/SalsaTekila/status/2084418735293513780
👍3
Some lessons and reflections from the past few months. That aside, the market has been boring. BTC feels like there are no sellers left, but nobody wants to touch it either, which is typical of a depression phase. I'm just accumulating BTC and trying not to overtrade unless something obvious catches my eye over the coming month. https://x.com/SalsaTekila/status/2083579371055431952/photo/1
👍20
https://x.com/SalsaTekila/status/2083206359969943714
👍12
Trying a new format of less shitposty tweets: thumbs up if you like it, thumbs down if you don't care https://x.com/SalsaTekila/status/2081768898337046910
👍71
In late June we saw record ETF outflows, coupled with Saylor selling (and being front-run). The announcement only came July 6, but Strategy sold from June 29, and it was known from onchain activity, which Light made obvious on July 2 (maybe because his trade went the other way, we’ll never know). The point is, we’ve seen record selling and record FUD, and now that Saylor is finally selling, we are going up. This is…
👍34
Observing the monthly support re-test. MSTR and STRC are dumping significantly, and old Saylor clips have been resurfacing on the timeline for a while now. Saylor is seen as this big overhead that makes BTC uninvestable to the mainstream, while the elephant in the room remains quantum computing risk. For trades, I expect anything below 60K to be intra-month, but I would be quite surprised if we closed a month below…
👍29
So the selling extended beyond what I anticipated when I wrote the above message. We closed the week well below the 71K support I had. It was one of the largest volume, liquidation, and price-movement candles in recent history, coupled with multiple layers of FUD stacked on top of each other (read previous post). And yet, upon breaking below the February lows printed earlier this year, it couldn't push lower. The o…
👍40
In the past three days, we've had multiple FUDs hitting simultaneously: 1) Saylor selling 32 BTC as a headline, coupled with STRC de-pegging and MSTR taking a plunge. 2) Binance rolling out stock trading, read as a dilution of capital from crypto to tradfi. 3) The ETFs selling billions, record outflows. 4) Mt. Gox moving coins again, with distributions expected this year. 5) A French researcher independently redisco…
👍47
Approaching support. I've got bids scattered between 70k-72k, and I'll take whatever the market gives (not even sure I'll get any fills). Frankly, I was expecting an uglier Thursday, so the resilience comes as a bit of a surprise. I think we're nearing a local bottom here. There are rumors of Saylor selling going around. If he did sell, insiders would heavily front-run it, the same way his buys get front-run every …
👍48
This is my only chart currently. I'm mostly avoiding trades and holding onto my spot BTC, targeting numbers far beyond current ATH. This uptrend has been going on for over 100 days since the Feb 5 bottom, and is likely to continue. That said, the movements are slow with a lot of intra-day chop, so zooming out and focusing only on key areas helps minimize trade costs while maximizing potential reward. Strong chance w…
👍30
I'm personally remaining in spot, a little more cautious with any leveraged trades. If we don't see selling intensify into the end of May, I'll take it as another confirming sign that we're indeed in a bullish market.
👍21
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @salsatekila. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 383,194 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zoomed out - Salsatekila” (@salsatekila), 7,657 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salsatekila.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.