Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

نورق| سَالِمة الطاهِر

@salmaaltaher

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,183subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001245486381
TypeChannel
Username@salmaaltaher
Created13 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/salmaaltaher

Growth

2,1832,1932,1886 August 2026 — 2,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,193 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,186 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,183 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,182–2,195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:232,183-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:332,186-7
7 Aug 2026, 00:012,193no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:552,193first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.53%
avg views ÷ 2,183 subscribers
Avg views / post
186
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,538
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1275.0%
👍318.8%
👏16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC85 viewsread 7 August 2026

‏منَ الألفَاظ الَّتي جَمعَت مَعاني الافتِقار إلى الله: لا أُعوِّل إلَّا عَليكَ، ولا أُؤمِّل إلَّا فيكَ.

5 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"بلَّغ الله بالدعاء أقوامًا عاجزين عن كلِّ سببٍ إلا عن حبل الدعاء بتوفيق ربّهم، ووصلهم بمرادهم بخيرٍ من أسبابهم، وقُطع آخرون لظنّهم الاستغناء بما تيسّر لهم من الأسباب! ‏فلا عجب أن يقول رسول الله ﷺ إنَّ العاجز حقًّا هو العاجز عن دعاء ربّه كلَّ شأنه، ما ظهر له تيسُّره، وما عجز عنه، فلا مانع لما أعطى، ولا معطي لما منع سبحانه، ومنعه العطاء!"

💯1

3 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC132 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

أن تكون أيّامي بيِّنةً كالشمس لا أضلُّ بين تقلُّباتها وعتماتُها!

💯1

3 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

يعلم الله حجم انتظاري للبشائر، وتلهف قلبي لها، استبشر وأظن بالله خيراً، في كل نص تسقط عليه عيني، أقف مستبشره ويردد قلبي اللهمّ اجعلها أول البشائر! - سيستجيب٣٣٢

💯1

3 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC136 viewsread 7 August 2026

تَغابَيتُ عَن قَومي فَظَنّوا غَباوَتي بِمَفرِقِ أَغبانا حَصىً وَتُرابُ وَلَو عَرَفوني حَقَّ مَعرِفَتي بِهِم إِذاً عَلِموا أَنّي شَهِدتُ وَغابوا وَما كُلُّ فَعّالٍ يُجازى بِفِعلِهِ وَلا كُلُّ قَوّالٍ لَدَيَّ يُجابُ وَرُبَّ كَلامٍ مَرَّ فَوقَ مَسامِعي كَما طَنَّ في لَوحِ الهَجيرِ ذُبابُ إِلى اللَهِ أَشكو أَنَّنا بِمَنازِلٍ تَحَكَّمُ في آسادِهِنَّ كِلابُ! أبو فراس الحمداني.

3 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC140 viewsread 7 August 2026

سلِّم سمعي مِن كُلِّ كلمةٍ تُؤذيه، ‏وسلِّم قلبي مِن أي شعورٍ يُرهقُه.

1 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC193 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

كلما مرت عليَّ مشاهد الحب بين الصحب لتلين فؤادي، تذكرتُ نور عيني زهرتي؛ حبيبتي التي نالت من قلبي مبلغًا لم يأتِ عليه سواها، حتى صارت جُل جهاتٍ أنِسُه. ألفتها هينةً لينةً، تستوعب مني ما لا أستوعبه من نفسي، وتدرك فيها ما لا أدركه، وكأنها تبصر في -لحبها- مواضع قد تغيب عني فأقسُو على أحيانًا، ثم تعمد إلى ما استعصبته بعجلي فيستحيل سهلًا يسيرًا، كأنها ملكت الحل لكل مشكلة تروِّعني، والبرد للنار التي تشب برأسي، والطمأنينة ل

1 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC189 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مجرد تخيُّل لحظة الإنجاز والعبور هو السَّكينة الوحيدة التي تداعب خيالي، خَدَرٌ لذيذ يطمئن له قلبي المضطرب. لكن، سرعان ما تباغتني الفكرة الأخرى.. فكرة الإخفاق أو عدم الوصول، فتضرب رأسي كصاعقة مروّعة، تجعلني أتمنى لو كان بإمكاني إيقاف هذا العقل الثَّائر عن التفكير، لو كان بوسعي أن أصرخ في وجه مخاوفي: "لقد فعلت كل ما بوسعي!" أعلم يقيناً، في هذه اللحظة من التعب الشديد، أن لا شيء على وجه الأرض يمكنه أن يداوي جراحي، أو يمن

1 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC158 viewsread 7 August 2026

يا لَهْفَ قلبي على شيئينِ لو جُمعا! دعوتان هما كلُّ الدنيا في عيني، وعلمت ما فيهما من صدقِ الشوق؛ فيا ربّ، كما زرعتهما في فؤادي شوقاً، فاجمع بيني وبينهما قدراً وواقعاً، واجعل لي فيهما قرّةَ عينٍ لا تنقطع..

1 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC157 viewsread 7 August 2026

"سنُخبر الطُّرقات يومًا.. أنّنا قد عبرنا، برغم تيهِ الخُطى، والبُعد، والتّعب." - سيستجيب٣٣١

27 Jul 2026, 23:16 UTC247 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"هو الشفاءُ لما في القلبِ من سقم"! اللهمَّ علمنا القرآن اللهمَّ انفعنا بالقرآن اللهمَّ اهدنا بالقرآن اللهمَّ ارفعنا بالقرآن

💯4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @salmaaltaher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,039,848 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نورق| سَالِمة الطاهِر” (@salmaaltaher), 2,183 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salmaaltaher.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.