Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Илона, пишет тебе…

Channel

Илона, пишет тебе…

@sahar_brand

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,959subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001713003413
TypeChannel
Username@sahar_brand
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/sahar_brand

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9591,9851,9727 August 2026 — 1,985 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,985 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,982 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,983 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,982 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,977 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,979 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,978 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,976 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,975 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,974 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,972 subscribers27 September 2026 — 1,969 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,963 subscribers11 October 2026 — 1,959 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 65 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,955–1,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 17:391,959-4
5 Oct 2026, 13:361,963-6
27 Sept 2026, 12:201,969-3
15 Sept 2026, 13:181,972-2
12 Sept 2026, 02:391,974-1
7 Sept 2026, 17:391,975-1
2 Sept 2026, 11:061,976-2
30 Aug 2026, 10:271,978-1
27 Aug 2026, 08:331,979+2
24 Aug 2026, 14:251,977-5
20 Aug 2026, 20:121,982-1
17 Aug 2026, 12:351,983+1
11 Aug 2026, 04:551,982-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:101,985no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:451,985first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5143.2%
❤4639.0%
👍1512.7%
😁32.54%
🤩21.69%
🎉10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sahar_brand. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 May 2026 to 22 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 12:22 UTC178 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥5❤3

22 Jun 2026, 12:20 UTC179 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ну наконец-то карусели в своем стиле 😍🔥 Меня уже достали все эти видосики, которые обещают делать карусели за пару кликов. Да, они делают, но все стали похожи друг на друга, как под копирку . Вроде красиво, быстро, но нет якорения на личный бренд стиля, нет аутентичности и ты просто теряешься в массе однотипного контента, а для меня это триггер... Поэтому, несмотря на все эти разнообразие советов, как сделать кар…

🔥5👍3

10 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTC178 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

😱оказывается все так просто Вчера сложился инсайт, как объяснить одну сложнейшую штуку простыми словами. Почему в одних экспертов мы влюбляемся за секунду, а других хочется заблокировать?

🔥7❤5👍4

1 Jun 2026, 13:14 UTC213 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😱Текст написан … а фоток новых нет На выходных села наконец-то делать для себя, ни для своих любимых клиентов Текст написан, стиль сформирован … блин… ну а фоток новых нет😂 Мой внутренний эстет не готов соглашаться на меньше, если мне НЕ КРАСИВО я даже делать ничего не начну … И тут начинается внутренний диалог: — Ну ок, какие есть варианты? •нана банана, •фотостоки, •архивы контента… — Не хочу, это время, это т…

❤5🔥2🎉1

30 May 2026, 15:17 UTC162 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤫 Как слабость стала моей силой Помню как учитель русского языка поставим мне 4 за то что я левой рукой небрежно написала диктант, потому что права была сломана 😂 Для меня это была одновременно и радость и боль. Боль, то что мои старания не оценили и снизили оценку и гордость, то что я не сделала ни одной ошибки С момента как я научилась читать мне всегда давался этот навык тяжело, мысли улетали, строчки путались,…

❤7🔥4

21 May 2026, 11:29 UTC162 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Три года назад мой парикмахер сказал кое-что про заработок на любимом деле это помогло больше зарабатывать и быть счастливее ♥️

🔥3👍2

15 May 2026, 08:03 UTC172 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Заботливое напоминание 😈

🔥9❤1

13 May 2026, 16:28 UTC175 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Какие же они были смелые… Сегодня была на выставке импрессионистов в Пушкинском музее 😍 И у меня весь день из головы не выходит эта мысль про смелость. Потому что до импрессионистов искусство во многом стремилось к реализму. «Правильно» рисовать, аккуратно, как будто художник должен был доказать: «смотрите, я умею идеально повторять реальность» А потом появились люди, которые начали всё «ломать» Кто-то писал огро…

❤4🔥2

7 May 2026, 09:47 UTC164 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁉️ВИЗУАЛ БОЛЬШЕ НЕ ВАЖЕН Это, наверное, одна из самых опасных мыслей, которую массово начали продвигать в экспертных блогах. Потому что люди путают: ❌ отсутствие “идеальной картинки” и ❌ отсутствие управления впечатлением. Даже когда человек выходит: — без макияжа — без монтажа — “как есть” …он всё равно создаёт образ. И управляет тем, как его воспринимают. Самое интересное — многие даже не понимают, ПОЧЕМУ одни …

❤3🔥2👍1

7 May 2026, 09:03 UTC138 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

😱Я пошла в интересный опыт : отпустить контроль и не искать безопасность Поделилась, как это не просто отпустить то, за что держалась всю жизнь

🔥5👍2

1 May 2026, 20:33 UTC190 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨Поэтому эксперты не получают продажи через соцсети, даже если в жизни легко продают? Ты можешь быть сильным экспертом с кейсами, результатами, опытом. Но в соцсетях… тебя просто не покупают. И проблема не в контенте. И даже не в визуале. 👉 Есть одна ошибка, из-за которой рушится всё доверие …. и ты, скорее всего, её даже не замечаешь. Самое интересное, что в жизни у тебя покупают легко. А в блоге — тишина. И эт…

❤5🔥3🤩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sahar_brand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🟢Родочинская в сети
@julia_rodochinskaya · 19,133
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Илона, пишет тебе…” (@sahar_brand), 1,959 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sahar_brand.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.