Brutal! Russian FPV drone hits the evac group of the NATO proxy force
🔥51😱16❤9🙏5🏆2👻1🤬1🤷♂1

Channel
@ruvidz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,797subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001494010982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruvidz |
| Created | 28 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruvidz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 2,797 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:08 | 2,803 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 2,801 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 2,806 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 2,808 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 2,811 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 2,812 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 2,817 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 2,819 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 2,819 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
797 reactions across 14 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 148 | 18.6% | |
| 🔥 | 142 | 17.8% | |
| 🤬 | 94 | 11.8% | |
| 🤣 | 93 | 11.7% | |
| ❤ | 64 | 8.03% | |
| 🫡 | 61 | 7.65% | |
| 😁 | 50 | 6.27% | |
| 🏆 | 33 | 4.14% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 2.63% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 2.13% | |
| 🍾 | 12 | 1.51% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 1.51% | |
| 🤡 | 9 | 1.13% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 1.00% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 0.753% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.627% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 0.502% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.376% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 0.376% | |
| 🤓 | 3 | 0.376% | |
| 7 further kinds | 9 | 1.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Brutal! Russian FPV drone hits the evac group of the NATO proxy force
🔥51😱16❤9🙏5🏆2👻1🤬1🤷♂1
Two days ago the Ukrainian nazionalist and "activist" Demyan Ganul, who terrorized Odessa for years, was shot and killed in broad daylight. His liquidation was caught on the security camera. Some people were taking selfies next to his corpse (pic) The assailant was captured, turned out he was a Ukro soldier. Rumor has it: that this whole thing was about donation money that Ganul was collecting and which was suppos…
🔥51🍾12❤10👍5😁5🤔2🥰2
🤷🏻♂️Meanwhile, the leader of Yemeny Houthis, Abdulmalik Badreddine Al-Houthi:
👏21❤8👍3😁2👎1
Tarasovka village, Donbass region | Using a ground robot courier Russian troops from the "Storm" detachment of the 33rd motorized rifle regiment deliver a pair of TM-62 anti-tank mines directly to the cellar where the NATO Proxy Force troops are holed up
🔥34👍7🫡5😁4🤬1
RT war correspondent Murad Gazdiev visited Zaoleshenka (Kursk region), a settlement near liberated Sudzha. That is where the "Pyaterochka" supermarket is located. When entering the Kursk region, almost every militant of the NATO Proxy Force felt the need to write his name and military unit number on it, and/or publish a mocking video or a selfie photo with the supermarket in the background. It became a landmark for…
👍36🏆17🔥4🤓3❤1
More than 10 years later, the European Court of Human Rights finally found Ukraine guilty of "failing to take measures to prevent violence and save people in Odessa on May 2nd, 2014" BUT IN THE END BLAMES RUSSIA Ukrainian radical nazionalists killed 48 people and filmed it without hiding their faces. Many were identified by independent sources, and not a single person was held responsible. European Parliament had no…
🤬42👍5🖕3❤1
The new head of the UK's Education Standards Authority...😳 This guy will inspect schools and training providers in England to ensure they "promote British values".😳 Note: Ofsted—the Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills—inspects and rates the institutions that provide education for young people in England, including schools, colleges, nurseries, and childminders.
🤣46🤡5🐳4👍4🤮3👎2❤1🤪1
AI translated version 😉
❤20👍9😁5🤣2
Russian president's full response to the 30-day truce proposal.
👍29❤4🤣1🤩1
Captured American M1A1SA Abrams tank in Kursk region🤷🏻♂️
👍24🏆14🎉7😢1
Liberation of Sudzha
🫡56❤7👍6
Another war crime by the NATO Proxy Force in the Kursk region was discovered by advancing Russian soldiers... Murder of civilians😢
🤬50😢11❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ruvidz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“R&U Videos” (@ruvidz), 2,797 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruvidz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.