Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Рефлексия сапиенса

@rsapiens

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,365subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001446107424
TypeChannel
Username@rsapiens
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 27 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rsapiens

Growth

1,3651,3681,366.56 August 2026 — 1,368 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,368 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,365 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,365–1,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 01:211,365-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:301,368no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:181,368first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14777.4%
🔥2915.3%
👀73.68%
😇42.11%
🤗21.05%
🌭10.526%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2021 to 29 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Nov 2025, 23:00 UTC458 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

если начинать декомпозицию жизненных целей с этого момента, то что тогда?

👀4

29 Nov 2025, 22:57 UTC448 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

если все возможное о чем можно помечтать - свести к итогу, то в самом конце нужно задать вопрос: «как я хочу умереть?»

🔥8👀3

28 Jul 2024, 20:27 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Когда вы подписывались на канал - большая вероятность того, что вы были увлечены психологией и всем около того и было это довольно давно в рамках настенного календаря сменились уже целые эпохи в ваших жизнях увлечение все еще осталось?

  1. ну типа да63%
  2. ну типа нет10%
  3. я твой будущий психолог10%
  4. я просто мониторю жив ты или нет30%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2024, 20:10 UTC≈1,250 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

по-моему идеальный коннект с аудиторией у меня: - за три года зевнул немного умнейшегоПхахаха контента на пару скролов - посты про сирики сообщил что встал с дивана и что не умер однажды меня учили не спамить и я в этом профи

😇4🤗1

28 Jul 2024, 19:52 UTC≈1,150 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ого, канал тоже не вымер

🔥10👍4

27 Mar 2022, 09:44 UTC≈6,690 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Смотрю сейчас кстати «Видоизменённый углерод». Балдёж, советую любителям про будущее, про технобионаноультрафантастику

👍8🔥1

27 Mar 2022, 09:38 UTC≈6,240 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Люблю сериалы, которые отнимают мое время. Но из этого можно вынести и пользу. Вы заметили, что многие сериалы играются нашими эмоциями? — Такова задумка режиссера и его команды, чтобы удерживать наше внимание до последней серии. Так вот. Из-за того, что эмоции часто меняются даже в рамках одной серии, то можно это использовать для тренировки навыков эмоционально интеллекта. Улавливать, определять, наблюдать, напра

👍22🔥1

16 Mar 2022, 11:55 UTC≈5,440 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Раз уж над собственной головой я работаю чаще, чем над контентом в этом канале, то буду иногда выкладывать сюда свои личные заметки

👍33🔥5

16 Mar 2022, 11:52 UTC≈4,940 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Чтобы в голове не возникало “турбулентности” относительно каких-либо дел, нужно принимать такие решения, которые не противоречат уже ранее принятым решениям, либо редактировать устаревшее. Что это значит. Человек частенько принимает подсознательные решения или другими словами — установки (на основе истинных желаний, объективных и необъективных данных). И когда в моменте принимаются те или иные решения, они могут выз

👍7🔥1

16 Mar 2022, 11:51 UTC≈3,670 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я как и всякий нормальный человек сталкиваюсь с затыками в своей психике. Сейчас их стало больше по некоторым причинам. Вернее даже не их стало больше, а я стал чаще обнаруживать уже имеющиеся. Я стараюсь с ними работать. Часто размышляю “на бумаге”. Вот последнее из размышлений:

👍5

25 Feb 2022, 01:58 UTC≈4,410 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Палка. Бить С первобытных времён, кажется, изменилось только одно — информация преодолевает теперь много большее расстояния, чем от соседней пещеры. Да и «пещер» стало больше. А возможностей добывать информацию из первоисточника пропорционально меньше.

👍13

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rsapiens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2024, 20:27 UTCAnonymous Poll141 voters

Когда вы подписывались на канал - большая вероятность того, что вы были увлечены психологией и всем около того и было это довольно давно в рамках настенного календаря сменились уже целые эпохи в ваших жизнях увлечение все еще осталось?

  1. ну типа да63%
  2. ну типа нет10%
  3. я твой будущий психолог10%
  4. я просто мониторю жив ты или нет30%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Oct 2021, 08:49 UTCAnonymous Poll632 voters

Как давно вы интересуетесь психологией?

  1. Меньше года15%
  2. От 1 до 3 лет27%
  3. Более 3 лет43%
  4. Не интересуюсь психологией вообще16%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2021 to 29 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,073,485 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рефлексия сапиенса” (@rsapiens), 1,365 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rsapiens.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.