Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rosario en Ferraz ✝️🇪🇸

Channel

Rosario en Ferraz ✝️🇪🇸

@rosarioenferraz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,006subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002026407608
TypeChannel
Username@rosarioenferraz
Created8 January 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rosarioenferraz

Growth

1,9932,0092,0016 August 2026 — 1,994 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,994 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,995 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,996 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,993 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,997 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,000 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,002 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,006 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,009 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,006 subscribers2,0066 August 20264 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,991–2,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 09:202,006-3
28 Aug 2026, 21:142,009+3
26 Aug 2026, 00:062,006+4
23 Aug 2026, 08:392,002+2
19 Aug 2026, 14:222,000+3
16 Aug 2026, 20:441,997+4
13 Aug 2026, 17:381,993-3
10 Aug 2026, 10:311,996+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:581,995+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:231,994no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:011,994first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

746 reactions across 22 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏47763.9%
12516.8%
🔥304.02%
🤬243.22%
👍212.82%
😈212.82%
😱172.28%
🤮131.74%
❤‍🔥30.402%
💯30.402%
😡30.402%
💩20.268%
🖕20.268%
🤝20.268%
👏10.134%
🕊10.134%
🫡10.134%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 746 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC350 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

¿POR QUÉ quieren ROBAR CEUTA a ESPAÑA? | EEUU, ISRAEL y MOHAMED VI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNjIzmfFALo

🙏15🤮3🫡1

6 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC296 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPsiUb2eKPM

20🙏12

4 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC495 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Os dejamos la entrevista que acaba de hacer a Jose Andrés Calderón la periodista Laura Rodríguez sobre la invasión de Ceuta y las claves geopolíticas. https://www.youtube.com/live/bcdRMrOklC0?si=hIa2PdCZLDuWX6cc

18🙏3💩1🤬1🤮1

4 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,330 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ROSARIO de FERRAZ en ROBLEDO de CHAVELA. Por las VÍCTIMAS de los INCENDIOS. Por el CAMPO https://youtu.be/vbcJ-duOY6w

🙏355

4 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC481 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

PADRE ÁNGEL DEFIENDE la INVASIÓN MARROQUÍ de CEUTA: "SON UNOS SANTOS" https://youtube.com/live/tauFzctbP7A?feature=share

😈21🔥9🙏4🤮32🖕2

3 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC701 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨 ¿DÓNDE ESTÁ FELIPE VI? CEUTA INVADIDA mientras LETIZIA y BARDEM se van de FESTIVAL https://youtube.com/live/xPUi-HRslNk?feature=share

🤬20🙏96😡3

2 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC658 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ENTREVISTA al TENIENTE CORONEL FRANCISCO BENDALA SOBRE LA INVASIÓN MARROQUÍ en CEUTA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCS13u1c5CM

👍7🙏5👏1

1 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC792 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨 La TRAICIÓN de TODAS las INSTITUCIONES ante la INVASIÓN de CEUTA https://youtube.com/shorts/rcWQRN3U4oU?feature=share

🔥16👍10🙏8🤬3🤮2

31 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC≈1,730 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ROSARIO por CEUTA y MELILLA. Por la INTEGRIDAD de ESPAÑA Recemos por nuestra patria https://www.youtube.com/live/v0DqyQS4Z08?si=ZBquMrjPnGFIWi99

🙏43❤‍🔥3🤝2🕊1

31 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC677 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨 MOHAMED VI ATACA CEUTA. ¿VAMOS hacia una GUERRA en ESPAÑA? https://youtu.be/kjkw7B-0c-A

🙏208💩1

30 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC674 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨 URGENTE: ¡INVASIÓN MARROQUÍ de CEUTA! TODO lo que QUIEREN OCULTARTE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vub3USfOa7o

😱17🙏14🤮4

29 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC655 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVmlG8vcSwY

🙏369

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @rosarioenferraz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Santiago Abascal 🇪🇸
@SantiagoAbascalPresidente · 39,990
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rosario en Ferraz ✝️🇪🇸” (@rosarioenferraz), 2,006 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rosarioenferraz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.