Channel
@rocketbomb_btc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,461subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001414568325 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rocketbomb_btc |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rocketbomb_btc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 1,461 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 1,464 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 1,465 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
195 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 96 | 49.2% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 25.6% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 7.18% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 5.64% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 4.62% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 3.08% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.05% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.513% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2025 to 5 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The current market outlook for Bitcoin and Ethereum remains uncertain, with no clear bullish signals in sight. Despite periods of short-term relief, the bigger picture suggests that we are not yet ready for a sustained uptrend. One of the key indicators, the MACD on the weekly chart, has shown a bearish crossover—historically a sign of weakening momentum. When the MACD line crosses below the signal line on higher ti…
👍11❤7😢2😱2
https://www.tradingview.com/x/QEHldILk/
❤5👍2🔥2
https://www.tradingview.com/x/gXetsTFH/
❤3🔥1🤔1
https://www.tradingview.com/x/AXj2oOfY/ That's what we have at the moment - 29% from 12 January
❤7🤩3👍2
On January 12, my closest like-minded traders and I gathered in our private group to discuss the global situation and its impact on the crypto market. That’s when we made a bold decision—to open a long-term short position! And guess what? It was absolutely the right call! 🔥 Take a look at the post and carefully analyze the chart! 📊 When I shared similar insights on TradingView, I faced massive hate. My posts didn’t…
❤8👍6😱2
https://www.tradingview.com/x/WSV8uV30/ We are near our last target! 😍 After it, we can expect some rise - a retest of the neckline is possible😉
❤7🔥1
Hello, dear friends! I really hope you all managed to successfully trade Bitcoin’s breakdown! We had a great time! 😆🎯 Now, we’re watching $84K and keeping an eye on further price action. There’s a strong possibility that the price will quickly play out the double-top pattern! Check out my latest post for more details! 👇 Thank you for your attention—stay with us! Sending you all a big hug! 🤗💛 https://www.tradingv…
❤8🤩3🔥2😱2🎉1
Today Bitcoin is trading around $96,241, down 1.26% over the past 24 hours. The price fluctuated between $95,670 and $100,186 during the day. The price now below $98,000, there’s still a risk of further downside, possibly testing the $91,400 support or even down to $90 000 For now, we’re seeing moderate weakness, but as always, the market can surprise. Stay sharp!
❤8🎉2👏2🤩1🥰1
Are You in …. now? anonymous poll Long – 14 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 42% Short – 12 👍👍👍👍👍👍 36% Neutral – 7 👍👍👍👍 21% 👥 33 people voted so far.
❤3👍1
NOTHING NEW 🥱🙄 https://www.tradingview.com/x/NyIeAZFE/
❤4🎉4🤩2👍1🥰1
As of February 6, Bitcoin is trading around $98,264 with minor fluctuations. After a sharp drop below $93,000 earlier this month, the market rebounded, but there’s still a chance we could revisit $90,000 before the next major move. At the same time, a record $1.6 billion Bitcoin outflow from exchanges hints at growing institutional interest, which could support a new rally. 📈 I’am remain optimistic, with targets of…
❤6👍5🤩2
📉 little more down
❤5👍3🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rocketbomb_btc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,229,006 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚀RocketBomb 💣 TRADING @roketbomb” (@rocketbomb_btc), 1,461 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rocketbomb_btc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.