💳 A non-KYC VISA debit cards available worldwide to our Android users are here. Don’t hesitate to try it out and referr it to your friends to do the same. Soon, Revuto will update the iOS app to unlock the same card features for Apple devices. Check our roadmap for what’s coming because it’s about the time we start pushing the $REVU up (for good). Thank you 🙏 https://x.com/get_revuto/status/2084627492560654833?s=20

Channel
Revuto REVU • Official Announcements
@revuto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,082subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001368785734 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @revuto |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/revuto |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 5,082 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 5,086 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 5,093 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 5,095 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 5,095 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.2%
- avg views ÷ 5,082 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 519
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 March 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,558 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🔥 VISA cards for whitelisted users went out on Monday and today, we already released the first app update based on the first user feedback. If you have Android device and would like to access the product, write us your Revuto UID. You can also wait for the next week when the product will be available to all Android users. The iOS version will come in two to three weeks. https://x.com/get_revuto/status/208255188057660…
💳 Dear Revutonians, we’re on trajectory to unlock VISA crypto-cards for Revuto users (please, whitelist your UID if you can via https://t.co/ZFTDJCFqul) on Android devices starting next week. We apologise for the waiting but we’re getting there. As promised, the Crypto wallet is out and working, the UX is polished, we did some upgrades according to the first user feedback and now the VISA cards are the next product c…
🚀 VISA Cards compatible with Apple/Google Pay/Wallet and supporting crypto are coming, but to help us test the product, there is a roll-out process. Android users will get an early access while iOS users will need to wait for additional 2-3 weeks to get the same. Read the announcement and whitelist your UID (user id) to get an early access before Revuto opens the product to users worldwide. https://x.com/get_revuto/s…
🚀 As the photo says - You don’t want to miss this out. Nobody will! $REVU boosters are coming. https://x.com/get_revuto/status/2072696479123206296
🚀🚀🚀 In times when crypto is slowly but surely becoming a regulated industry, Revuto is keeping up with user requirements to offer them non-KYC products of huge importance. Recently launched Crypto Wallet and now, upcoming VISA debit cards compatible with Google and Apple Pay, all available worldwide, will keep serving users across the globe without regulatory hurdles. We expect a huge bump in new user activity within…
⚠️⚠️⚠️ Our dear Revutonians, we decided to make an update on the MC cards within the app while we can to suite more markets, especially Africa where minimum top-up of $15 is a deal breaker. In short, a setup with minimum top-up of $15 and only EUR/USD as subscription price were not suitable for some specific markets where we see great opportunity to grow our business. The users asked us for lower minimum top-up price…
A visual reminder about why Revuto is so special, what problems it solves and where it finds its niche. Also a good way to help people understand why Revuto business has a long term future. https://x.com/get_revuto/status/2066880036540412116?s=20
🔥🔥🔥 things are getting real and soon you’ll be able to taste it for yourself. Alongside frictionless onboarding (without complicated KYC, no questionaires…), the VISA cards for your Apple and Google Pay wallets are coming to the Revuto app, and it’s just a beginning. https://x.com/get_revuto/status/2064726337743466796?s=20
🔥🔥🔥 Dear Revutonians, today we made another step forward towards our ultimate goal. Crypto Debit CARDs for subscription payments are out and you can try them worldwide. Simply add USDT or ADA to your Crypto wallet, go to subscriptions, create a subscription profile page and request a virtual debit card for the payment (allowing top-ups in crypto) 🔥 As fast as during the next week, VISA debit cards supporting crypto f…
👉 Swap Crypto in seconds! As we prepare for the next app update that’s bringing back Debit Cards, but this time in much greater capacity, it’s a good time to remind you about our token swap feature. https://x.com/get_revuto/status/2056496359079813490
👉 Revuto - the simplest wallet! https://x.com/get_revuto/status/2052095941751066853?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @revuto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 653,114 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Revuto REVU • Official Announcements” (@revuto), 5,082 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/revuto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.