16 measurements spanning 15 days, net -454. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,222–42,812 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 06:13
42,290
-38
20 Aug 2026, 22:43
42,328
-29
19 Aug 2026, 23:52
42,357
-40
18 Aug 2026, 21:27
42,397
-28
17 Aug 2026, 20:28
42,425
-22
16 Aug 2026, 18:23
42,447
-62
15 Aug 2026, 05:34
42,509
-20
13 Aug 2026, 22:28
42,529
-24
12 Aug 2026, 19:58
42,553
-28
11 Aug 2026, 21:14
42,581
-23
10 Aug 2026, 22:46
42,604
-32
9 Aug 2026, 21:31
42,636
-42
8 Aug 2026, 18:21
42,678
-49
7 Aug 2026, 19:42
42,727
-17
6 Aug 2026, 22:30
42,744
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:18
42,744
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
18
Links
18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
326 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
147
45.1%
❤
72
22.1%
🤯
31
9.51%
🔥
23
7.06%
👎
20
6.13%
😁
17
5.21%
👏
10
3.07%
🤔
3
0.92%
🥰
3
0.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2025 to 7 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @reporter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 January 2025 to 7 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Xanthorox AI Surfaces on Dark Web as Full Spectrum Hacking Assistant
New Xanthorox AI hacking platform spotted on dark web with modular tools, offline mode, and advanced voice, image, and code-based cyberattack features. - Source
@Reporter
🔍 Think you know Telegram? Think again!
Here are some must-know tips and tricks to take your Telegram game to the next level:
🟠 Secret chats with self-destructing messages for ultimate privacy.
🟠 Custom themes to personalize your app and make it truly yours.
🟠 Quick shortcuts to navigate faster and smarter.
🟠 Advanced search to find anything in seconds.
👉 But wait – there’s more! Want to discover even more hidden …
House passes bill to punish pandemic fraudsters; Dems balk, blame Elon Musk
Republicans said as much as $400 billion was stolen from the unemployment funds and just $5 billion has been recovered so far. Without the extension, tens of thousands of cases will go cold starting at the end of this month.
🌐 @Reporter
🚨 How you get scammed on Telegram
Scammers are getting smarter, and it’s easier than ever to fall into their traps. But don’t worry – we’ve got your back! Here’s what you need to know:
🔑 Key points from our latest article:
- Fake giveaways and ‘too good to be true’ offers.
- Phishing links disguised as legit messages.
- Impersonation scams – they pretend to be someone you trust.
Learn all 15 Telegram scam schemes …
Telegram as #1 Messenger Used by Cybercriminals for Communications
Telegram remains the undisputed leader in cybercriminal communications, with recent analysis revealing over 80 million unique identifiers and links to Telegram channelsshared across underground forums, a figure exceeding competitors like Discord (2.8 million links) and Session (450,000 IDs).
Cybersecurity News can’t profit without cybercriminals.
C…
The Decline of Telegram
Apple’s compliance with the British government’s privacy crusade sets a global precedent for protecting privacy and freedom.
Telegram, once touted as a privacy-focused communication platform, abandoned its privacy principles and will sell user data to the government or the highest bidder following Pavel Durov’s arrest in 2024.
For alternative options, refer to this article.
Report will con…
Cybersecurity Ventures expects global cybercrime costs to grow by 15 percent per year over the next five years, reaching $10.5 trillion USD annually by 2025, up from $3 trillion USD in 2015.
🌐 @Reporter
Telegram Abused as C2 Channel for New Golang Backdoor
Key findings:
- A new Go backdoor possibly of Russian origin has been
discovered.
- The malware uses Telegram as its C2 channel.
- Although the malware seems to still be under development it is completely functional.
@Reporter | Source
Milei backs away from LIBRA memecoin after 90% crash — ‘Not aware of the details’
Argentinian President Javier Milei is now distancing himself from the catastrophic launch of the Solana-based memecoin $LIBRA, which saw its market cap collapse from $4.5 billion to just $200 million within hours. - Source
As more world leaders adopt meme coins, it’ll be interesting to see if banks will follow and crash their own curr…
Whale.io Says Goodbye to Telegram and Focuses on Web
In a landmark move, Whale Casino, the biggest project and one of the most prominent operators in the Telegram community, has announced a shift in its operational strategy. The operator has decided to discontinue its Telegram bot service due to recent changes in the platform and decided to concentrate on its web platform, whale.io, heralding a new era of innovation…
WhatsApp disrupted a hacking campaign targeting journalists with Paragon spyware
“WhatsApp has disrupted a spyware campaign by Paragon that targeted several users, including journalists and members of civil society. We’ve reached out directly to people who we believe were affected. This is the latest example of why spyware companies must be held accountable for their unlawful actions. WhatsApp will continue to prote…
👍3❤1👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reporter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,456,914 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@reporter named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@report named in 26 posts, 8 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Report News” (@reporter), 42,290 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reporter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.