25 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1,767. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,402–6,213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:18
5,542
-341
14 Aug 2026, 18:57
5,883
-6
14 Aug 2026, 16:23
5,889
+750
14 Aug 2026, 09:45
5,139
-38
13 Aug 2026, 15:48
5,177
+29
13 Aug 2026, 14:06
5,148
+134
13 Aug 2026, 03:04
5,014
+26
12 Aug 2026, 23:03
4,988
+1,143
11 Aug 2026, 12:46
3,845
+110
11 Aug 2026, 08:56
3,735
+5
11 Aug 2026, 04:06
3,730
+4
11 Aug 2026, 00:52
3,726
no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:17
3,726
-22
10 Aug 2026, 08:28
3,748
no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:50
3,748
-3
10 Aug 2026, 01:41
3,751
-19
8 Aug 2026, 02:40
3,770
+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:52
3,768
no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:46
3,768
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:46
3,768
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 1 June 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
846 reactions across 6 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5237978656336284335
179
21.2%
🤡
102
12.1%
❤
80
9.46%
custom 5238047895504059458
75
8.87%
custom 5267421580568329172
57
6.74%
🤮
46
5.44%
custom 4942706823036667163
39
4.61%
👍
24
2.84%
custom 4943062119911261579
19
2.25%
custom 5237715898827048559
19
2.25%
custom 5224309124052852970
18
2.13%
💩
17
2.01%
custom 5239988353138456627
15
1.77%
custom 5361599428706728607
15
1.77%
custom 5240337714368246799
14
1.65%
custom 4940667233262109913
13
1.54%
👎
13
1.54%
custom 5267161155226338310
12
1.42%
custom 5237824557204668276
11
1.30%
❤🔥
11
1.30%
17 further kinds
67
7.92%
Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 846reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17,904
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 6 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
15,000
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rentbuy_user. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2025 to 11 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😳 @StolbStarsBot - Мой новый бот, в котором вы можете:
⭕ 1) Покупать Telegram Stars, Telegram Premium, GRAM (ton) себе и своим друзьям.
❤ 2) Покупать и арендовывать NFT подарки, юзернеймы, анонимные номера.
🔥 3) Покупать удаленные подарки
🔽 В боте доступны все виды оплат: СБП, по карте, Cryptobot, на TON адрес и так далее.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
😀 Владелец бота - @stolb
🤗 • Навигация по каналу • 🤗
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
✅ ПЕРВЫЙ РЯД ЮЗЕРНЕЙМОВ (доступно 60 юзернеймов)
Нажмите чтобы увидеть 👍
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
😺 ВТОРОЙ РЯД ЮЗЕРНЕЙМОВ (доступно 60 юзернеймов)
Нажмите чтобы увидеть 😝
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
😳 ТРЕТИЙ РЯД ЮЗЕРНЕЙМОВ (доступно 60 юзернеймов)
Нажмите чтобы увидеть ❤
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
БОТ • ОТЗЫВЫ • ТУТОРИАЛ • ИНФО
😳 Приветствую всех в данном канале. Тут можно арендовать NFT юзернеймы на определенное время либо же купить его себе навсегда.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
😺 Для чего же нужен NFT юзернейм?
1) Юзернейм будет отображаться как второй, то есть ваш основной и этот NFT юзернейм.
2) Юзернейм можно ставить на свой любой аккаунт, а так же на канал/чат в котором вы являетесь администратором/владельцем.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
✅ При взятии юзернейма в аренд…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @rentbuy_user. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@rentbuy_user edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 34,001 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
12
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
12
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rentbuy_user named 12 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@warmname named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@usmister named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@zatapal named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@p0dnebom named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@penisyaka named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@pomulovan named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@glavneyshiy named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@vimcre named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@x88888u named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@seksanator named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ne_sudim named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@nft_gym named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STOLB NEWS | Новости” (@rentbuy_user), 5,542 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rentbuy_user.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.