Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

無糖

@remondrops0103

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,594subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001636589066
TypeChannel
Username@remondrops0103
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/remondrops0103

Growth

2,5942,6002,5978 August 2026 — 2,600 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,600 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,598 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,594 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,593–2,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 05:182,594-4
11 Aug 2026, 14:432,598-2
8 Aug 2026, 17:332,600no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:322,600first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 2,594 subscribers
Avg views / post
397
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,944
Reactions total556
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

556 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14926.8%
👏8916.0%
8815.8%
🫡468.27%
💩417.37%
🙏407.19%
😎335.94%
😁234.14%
162.88%
🤔162.88%
🔥81.44%
🎉50.899%
👀10.18%
😈10.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 556reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC162 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

5回目のUFOドロップ 🛸 WAR.GOV/UFO DOW-UAP-PR134、中東、2025年 https://x.com/whitehouse/status/2085739251199566243?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

9

7 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC162 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ふふふ😎 https://x.com/47news_official/status/2085744283303444850?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw https://x.com/kcwtje/status/2085836848732270681?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

12😎3

7 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC407 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

【速報】歌舞伎俳優の中村小三郎さん(77)をひき逃げの疑いで書類送検  不祥事多すぎ歌舞伎界😎✨ https://x.com/gontashota/status/2085561668332060761?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

😎30

7 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC419 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ファウチはもうすぐ刑務所行きだ!!!🥳🍿🍿🍿 https://x.com/papitrumpo/status/2085466295957406088?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

👏372👍2

6 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC432 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ミッチ・マコーネル、病院から退院 https://x.com/newswire_us/status/2085436914442633396?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

😁23

6 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC412 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ビル・ゲイツは、パンデミック全体を通じて7年間、最高機密のQクリアランスを保持していました。彼は選挙で選ばれた公務員ではありません。NIHの科学者でもありません。彼はただの非常に裕福な私的市民で、政府のCOVID対応を形成するのに一役買っただけです。 https://x.com/randpaul/status/2085409565781446959?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

💩29

6 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC395 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ビル・ゲイツはアンチQだ。 https://x.com/randpaul/status/2085409565781446959?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw https://x.com/kadmitriev/status/2085416202860384600?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

👍29

6 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC445 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

上院委員会、COVID公聴会での質問拒否を理由にファウチ博士を議会侮辱罪で拘束することを投票で決定 https://x.com/theinsiderpaper/status/2085355702298759542?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

👏32🎉5👀1

6 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC400 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

沼地は深い。 時にあなたは人々に真実を伝えることができません。 あなたはそれらを示さなければなりません。 そうしてこそ、絶壁で、人々は変化[参加]する意志を見つけるでしょう。 私たち国民は、長い間裏切られてきました。 立ちますか? 神と国のために。 自由のために。 人類のために。 WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL !!! Q https://x.com/kcwtje/status/2085367041058611360?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

👍26🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC396 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

あなたがいなければ、集合的に、彼らの支配を回避する方法はありませんでした。 彼らは2016年の過ちを繰り返すつもりはありませんでした。 あなたは最も重要なものです。 団結し、分断しない。 あなたが目覚め、自分で考えることは、彼らの最大の恐怖です。 デジタル戦場へようこそ。 WWG1WGA !!! Q https://x.com/kcwtje/status/2085348591791636540?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

🫡27

6 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC403 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

非常に多くの人々が、世界の悪を認めることをまだ拒否しています。彼らはもっとたくさん見る必要があるでしょう。 情報の自由[真実] = END Q https://x.com/kcwtje/status/2085342475007500585?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

16

6 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC404 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

8/7/20 ブラックアウトの必要性 https://x.com/vincentcrypt46/status/1291717261435244544?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw https://x.com/kcwtje/status/2085326609612173714?s=46&t=IIeNpuyE_XGx3yELiZ8JLw

👍24🙏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @remondrops0103. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 685,319 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“無糖” (@remondrops0103), 2,594 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/remondrops0103.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.