Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for fka-rekt

Channel

fka-rekt

@rektnews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

7,032subscribers

-135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001582615060
TypeChannel
Username@rektnews
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 3 November 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rektnews

Growth

7,0327,1677,099.57 August 2026 — 7,167 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,163 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,148 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,133 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,117 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,103 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,089 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,075 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,072 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,064 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,054 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,032 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net -135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,012–7,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 04:377,032-22
6 Sept 2026, 13:367,054-10
2 Sept 2026, 05:167,064-8
30 Aug 2026, 05:547,072-3
26 Aug 2026, 22:547,075-14
23 Aug 2026, 20:097,089-14
20 Aug 2026, 01:047,103-14
16 Aug 2026, 20:037,117-16
13 Aug 2026, 12:477,133-15
10 Aug 2026, 18:017,148-15
7 Aug 2026, 17:487,163-4
7 Aug 2026, 05:027,167first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

610 reactions across 19 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16527.0%
😁10216.7%
🔥9715.9%
8313.6%
🤡325.25%
👏213.44%
🤔132.13%
🤮132.13%
👀111.80%
👎111.80%
🤣101.64%
🕊91.48%
😱71.15%
🙈60.984%
😨50.82%
🫡50.82%
40.656%
🖕40.656%
🍌30.492%
🥰30.492%
5 further kinds60.984%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 610 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2022 to 30 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jan 2024, 20:25 UTC≈17,300 views62 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Hello Julien. In an unreciprocated gesture of goodwill, I deleted the posts I made last week. I also sent your lawyers another email asking to go to mediation, exactly as I have been doing since July 2023. If you keep ignoring my emails, my Telegram messages, and if the team members at rekt.news and Stake Capital keep blocking me when I ask about my investments, then what other option do I have but to complain in

😁239🤣8👍7🙈6👏5🖕4

Signed rekt

3 Jan 2024, 17:02 UTC≈14,300 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Four days ago, Orbit Chain lost $85M. But you already knew about that, because it was FOUR DAYS AGO. Welcome to old.rekt.news. In other news, rekt readers want to know what happened to the YouTube Channel! Clues can be found in the comment section. DYOR - ask them yourself. https://twitter.com/RektHQ/status/1742544102699286786

😁11👍3🤡3

Signed rekt

2 Jan 2024, 09:14 UTC≈11,400 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Gradually, then all at once. Levana_protocol lost over $1.1M to an oracle manipulation attack lasting almost two weeks. But if it hadn’t been for network congestion... ...would they have even noticed? https://twitter.com/RektHQ/status/1740788975139426649

👍21🤨1

Signed rekt

22 Dec 2023, 18:29 UTC≈11,900 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Unfortunately, we are unable to produce any successful creative works of our own, so we are now rewriting content produced by the original author. More on that coming soon! Meanwhile, enjoy this lacklustre copycat content. Merry Christmas! https://twitter.com/RektHQ/status/1738199986322464794

8🤡7👍51🤮1

Signed rekt

8 Dec 2023, 09:45 UTC≈10,500 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026

The tide may be turning, but the waters remain as treacherous as ever. Our latest phishing roundup covers the newest tackle and the most tempting lures. WiLl yOu tAke the bAiT?!?! 🤪 https://rekt.news/plenty-of-phish/

👍73

Signed rekt

30 Nov 2023, 12:42 UTC≈10,000 views30 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0479da9d6a3a29b294d6337630ea0a482e7ec7223f3b6e6d72442f6c450264d4

😁23👏4🍌3

Signed rekt

23 Nov 2023, 16:52 UTC≈11,000 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Paging @bneiluj. Please reply to my email. Thank you.

😁8👍4😱2

Signed rekt .news

23 Nov 2023, 16:48 UTC≈10,600 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

OG decentralised exchange KyberNetwork got rekt across six chains, for a total loss of over $48M. Perhaps there’s some good news in store for KyberSwap and LPs. Or is the attacker just toying with us? We'll find out when they wake up... https://rekt.news/kyberswap-rekt/

👀8👍21🤔1

Signed rekt .news

10 Nov 2023, 21:29 UTC≈9,150 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Nothing like a nine-figure exchange hack to cool the pump-induced euphoria. @Poloniex had its hot wallets drained of $126M today. @justinsuntron has promised that losses will be covered. Just how deep do His Excellency's pockets go? https://rekt.news/poloniex-rekt/

👍16🤡7

Signed rekt .news

10 Nov 2023, 09:47 UTC≈10,200 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

The sandwicher has become the sandwiched. $2M was lost on Tuesday night as an MEV bot got a taste of its own medicine. When it comes to autonomous on-chain predators it’s hard to sympathise. Is this a simple case of ‘you win some, you lose some’? https://rekt.news/ripmevbot2/

😁18👍7

Signed rekt .news

15 Sept 2023, 21:06 UTC≈13,000 views34 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Another exchange drained. Is this Lazarus going for a September hat-trick? @remitano had $2.7M taken from its hot wallets yesterday. But quickly frozen USDT ensured profits were vastly reduced. Are we… learning? https://rekt.news/remitano-rekt/

15🤮6😨5👍3👎2🤣2🌭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rektnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“fka-rekt” (@rektnews), 7,032 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rektnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.