Channel name was changed to «fka-rekt»

Channel
fka-rekt
@rektnews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7,032subscribers
-135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001582615060 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rektnews |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 3 November 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rektnews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 7,032 | -22 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 7,054 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 7,064 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 7,072 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 7,075 | -14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 7,089 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 7,103 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 7,117 | -16 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 7,133 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 7,148 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 7,163 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 7,167 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
610 reactions across 19 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 165 | 27.0% | |
| 😁 | 102 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 97 | 15.9% | |
| ❤ | 83 | 13.6% | |
| 🤡 | 32 | 5.25% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 3.44% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 2.13% | |
| 🤮 | 13 | 2.13% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 1.80% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 1.80% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 1.64% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 1.48% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 1.15% | |
| 🙈 | 6 | 0.984% | |
| 😨 | 5 | 0.82% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 0.82% | |
| ☃ | 4 | 0.656% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 0.656% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.492% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.492% | |
| 5 further kinds | 6 | 0.984% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 610 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2022 to 30 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Hello Julien. In an unreciprocated gesture of goodwill, I deleted the posts I made last week. I also sent your lawyers another email asking to go to mediation, exactly as I have been doing since July 2023. If you keep ignoring my emails, my Telegram messages, and if the team members at rekt.news and Stake Capital keep blocking me when I ask about my investments, then what other option do I have but to complain in …
😁23❤9🤣8👍7🙈6👏5🖕4
Signed rekt
Four days ago, Orbit Chain lost $85M. But you already knew about that, because it was FOUR DAYS AGO. Welcome to old.rekt.news. In other news, rekt readers want to know what happened to the YouTube Channel! Clues can be found in the comment section. DYOR - ask them yourself. https://twitter.com/RektHQ/status/1742544102699286786
😁11👍3🤡3
Signed rekt
Gradually, then all at once. Levana_protocol lost over $1.1M to an oracle manipulation attack lasting almost two weeks. But if it hadn’t been for network congestion... ...would they have even noticed? https://twitter.com/RektHQ/status/1740788975139426649
👍2❤1🤨1
Signed rekt
Unfortunately, we are unable to produce any successful creative works of our own, so we are now rewriting content produced by the original author. More on that coming soon! Meanwhile, enjoy this lacklustre copycat content. Merry Christmas! https://twitter.com/RektHQ/status/1738199986322464794
❤8🤡7👍5⚡1🤮1
Signed rekt
The tide may be turning, but the waters remain as treacherous as ever. Our latest phishing roundup covers the newest tackle and the most tempting lures. WiLl yOu tAke the bAiT?!?! 🤪 https://rekt.news/plenty-of-phish/
👍7❤3
Signed rekt
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0479da9d6a3a29b294d6337630ea0a482e7ec7223f3b6e6d72442f6c450264d4
😁23👏4🍌3
Signed rekt
Paging @bneiluj. Please reply to my email. Thank you.
😁8👍4😱2
Signed rekt .news
OG decentralised exchange KyberNetwork got rekt across six chains, for a total loss of over $48M. Perhaps there’s some good news in store for KyberSwap and LPs. Or is the attacker just toying with us? We'll find out when they wake up... https://rekt.news/kyberswap-rekt/
👀8👍2❤1🤔1
Signed rekt .news
Nothing like a nine-figure exchange hack to cool the pump-induced euphoria. @Poloniex had its hot wallets drained of $126M today. @justinsuntron has promised that losses will be covered. Just how deep do His Excellency's pockets go? https://rekt.news/poloniex-rekt/
👍16🤡7
Signed rekt .news
The sandwicher has become the sandwiched. $2M was lost on Tuesday night as an MEV bot got a taste of its own medicine. When it comes to autonomous on-chain predators it’s hard to sympathise. Is this a simple case of ‘you win some, you lose some’? https://rekt.news/ripmevbot2/
😁18👍7
Signed rekt .news
Another exchange drained. Is this Lazarus going for a September hat-trick? @remitano had $2.7M taken from its hot wallets yesterday. But quickly frozen USDT ensured profits were vastly reduced. Are we… learning? https://rekt.news/remitano-rekt/
❤15🤮6😨5👍3👎2🤣2🌭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rektnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@rektnews named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“fka-rekt” (@rektnews), 7,032 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rektnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.