Posted without readable text
Views per post sit far below this size band
4.5 average views per post against 5,022 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.089%. Across the 704 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,170–9,997 subscribers, posting mainly in Portuguese — the middle half sit between 3.00% and 11.5%, with a median of 6.19%.
| Window | 30 days (21 July 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 49 of 49 published in the window (49 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 219 |
| Mature posts only | 0.103% over 34 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 5,022 measured 20 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:por · 704 channels · p10 1.38% · p25 3.00% · p50 6.19% · p75 11.5% · p90 19.9% |
| Position in cohort | 0.284th percentile · 1/71 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.057% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Portuguese · 82.4%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
