5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,527–1,535 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 01:54
1,534
+2
9 Aug 2026, 07:15
1,532
+3
6 Aug 2026, 14:03
1,529
+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:35
1,528
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:03
1,528
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.7%
avg views ÷ 1,534 subscribers
Avg views / post
763
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
11 (18 May 2026 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
1,525
Reactions total
49
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
254 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
244
96.1%
👎
10
3.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Термополиуретановый патч
Футбольные клубы каждый день бомбят дропами новых комплектов формы. Многие из них выглядят действительно достойно, и это, конечно, радует.
Но с глобальной сцены хочется сместить фокус на один, казалось бы, небольшой элемент — термополиуретановый патч.
Современные ТПУ-патчи позволяют создавать любую фактуру тиснения, превращая даже такой маленький элемент в носитель дополнительного смысла. …
Примерно раз в год на Трибуне выходит материал о том, чем сейчас дышат некогда активные авторы блогов на Спортсе.
Время идет, прически меняются, неизменным остается только статус воспитанника Спортса.
Как тогда, так и сейчас чувствую себя как истребитель на взлетной.
https://www.sports.ru/football/blogs/3411130.html
Адель Бурганов из команды агентства Плеймейкер предложил составить личный рейтинг футбольных форм прошедшего сезона в России. Договорились не назначать премий, а отметить комплекты, которые зацепили лично нас. Мой топ:
🐂 Краснодар
Форма попала в этот топ благодаря полосатым гетрам — они решают в обоих комплектах. Именно такие элементы часто и делают форму запоминающейся.
Но если серьезно, то экипировочная фабрика …
Будущее Кубка Гагарина
На Кубке Гагарина разыграна последняя шайба, и ещё по ходу плей-офф начали активно обсуждать, как дальше отмечать чемпионов на трофее. Версий вокруг этой темы ходит много, и я слышал несколько разных мнений. Один из неожиданных слухов был связан с историей создания Кубка: якобы договор с ювелиром в момент запуска лиги был составлен не лучшим образом, из-за чего у автора могли сохраниться опред…
Субботу и воскресенье провёл в Ростове Великом на Дизайн Выходных. Делился опытом и экспертизой, рассказывал, как мы в Кубере интегрируем территориальную идентичность и госсимволы в спортивный дизайн.
Ростов очень маленький, но очень крутой. Несколько лет назад провёл день в Ростовском кремле и тогда получил огромное удовольствие от города. В этот раз ощущения только закрепились.
Д-В проходили в Гостином дворе — от…
👍15
Signed Mikhail Antipin
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @reforma_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ReForma” (@reforma_2), 1,534 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reforma_2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
