Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Red Eagle Law, L.C.

Channel

Red Eagle Law, L.C.

@redeaglelaw

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,627subscribers

+1,692 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001626287304
TypeChannel
Username@redeaglelaw
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/redeaglelaw

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,9288,6277,777.56 August 2026 — 6,935 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,932 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,936 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,933 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,928 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,933 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,941 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,003 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,055 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,213 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,265 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,364 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,705 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,983 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,282 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,559 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,627 subscribers6 August 202612 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 67 days, net +1,692. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,673–8,882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 11:568,627+68
5 Oct 2026, 09:158,559+277
27 Sept 2026, 00:218,282+299
15 Sept 2026, 06:197,983+278
11 Sept 2026, 21:367,705+341
7 Sept 2026, 02:427,364+99
2 Sept 2026, 17:137,265+52
31 Aug 2026, 01:057,213+158
28 Aug 2026, 09:127,055+52
25 Aug 2026, 05:357,003+62
21 Aug 2026, 20:066,941+8
19 Aug 2026, 02:456,933+5
16 Aug 2026, 01:456,928-5
12 Aug 2026, 04:456,933-3
9 Aug 2026, 14:136,936+4
6 Aug 2026, 19:486,932-3
6 Aug 2026, 15:036,935first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 35 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

948 reactions across 24 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤35036.9%
🤬10711.3%
👍9810.3%
😢707.38%
👎434.54%
💩394.11%
🤡373.90%
😁353.69%
😱313.27%
🔥242.53%
👏171.79%
💔151.58%
🤯121.27%
🤣101.05%
👌90.949%
🆒80.844%
👀60.633%
😎50.527%
😭50.527%
🙏50.527%
10 further kinds222.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 948 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈3,730 views125 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

I couldn't sleep last night knowing that the DV-2027 program might not happen, so I filed a lawsuit with @redeaglelaw as plaintiff in San Diego about 3 am. Case number is: 26-cv-4738- JO-VET. The lawsuit has been assigned to US District Court Judge Jinsook Ohta. Link to complaint: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hiPsPd0-plZUfbIQCnJSS3nLBYmGhZzP/view?usp=sharing Working on TRO now. -curtis🦅

❤88👍12😁10🆒7🤡4👏1🔥1🗿1

18 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC≈3,310 views45 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Some bad news coming out of NYC. 17 members of the Mabna Institute, an Iran-based company, have been charged with " coordinated campaign of cyber intrusions." But also, strangely, 9 of the 17 were previously charged in 2018. So it looks like this is an old case, that is becoming a new case. I share here, because there's a strong chance this development may be weaponized by the Trump administration against the Irani…

🤬12😢9💔8😱5❤4👏3💩2🤣2

18 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈5,030 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026

New USCIS Policy Alert titled "Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility" just dropped. PA 2026-09 https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/policy-manual-updates/20260818-PublicChargeFinalRule.pdf -curtis🦅 “This policy is effective on September 18, 2026.”

💔5😎1😭1

18 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈2,860 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026

We will not have a Tuesday with Farshad show today because I’ll be accompanying a client to a I-485 interview this morning. -curtis

🔥10👍6❤2

17 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC≈2,920 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Wondering about the D/S Rule Change for F1 Students? While REL doesn't generally only represents F1 students with litigation for delayed or withheld immigration benefits, we understand many have questions about recent developments. Our senior associate Chuck Guo recently gave an overview of what the rule change means to SDUIS's USA English Language Center. Here's a link to that video: https://youtu.be/x8CUHlHhTNU?si…

❤3👍2👌1

17 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈3,120 views68 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Three class action lawsuits have upcoming motions or hearings challenging the policies. Red Eagle Law v. Edlow in the Northern District of California challenges the USCIS policy of holding and refusing to process applications for individuals from numerous countries. Curtis Morrison of Red Eagle Law notes in an interview that the Dorcas decision enjoins the USCIS holds, but the government has appealed that order. Judg…

❤52🔥6👍4❤‍🔥3🙏2👏1

12 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC≈6,590 views63 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Update in our class action lawsuit challenging PM-602-0192/4 holds in NDCA. Friday’s hearing is vacated. Judge Breyer plans to issue orders based on the papers. This isn’t good or bad, it usually just means the judge doesn’t have questions for attorneys because we’ve laid out arguments clearly in the papers. -curtis

❤50👍6🤔5👏1🤣1

12 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈4,020 views76 reactionsread 20 August 2026

"My son and I have spent over 120 days in the Dilley Immigration Processing Center, away from my husband, who was taken to the South Texas Detention Center in Pearsall, Texas. There, he faces even more horrible conditions, and he faces them alone. When I requested that my husband be reunited with us in Dilley, a so-called “family detention center” (the very existence of such a term is deeply troubling), I was told th…

💩35😢25👏5👎4🤯2❤1👍1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @redeaglelaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Red Eagle Law, L.C.” (@redeaglelaw), 8,627 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redeaglelaw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.