Channel
@recruitment_0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,055subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001550361692 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @recruitment_0 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/recruitment_0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 1,055 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 1,058 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 1,059 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 1,059 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 39.5% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 28.9% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 19 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Рекрутеров часто оценивают по одному критерию: закрыл вакансию или нет Обидно? Обидно! Потому что рекрутер не просто закрывает вакансию, а смотрит: ⚫️ где буксует воронка найма 🔵 какие вакансии зависают месяцами и почему ⚫️ где нанимающий менеджер тормозит процесс и т. д. Но почему тогда все помнят рекрутера только по «закрыл-не закрыл вакансию»? Потому что они продолжают объяснять всё через «мне кажется» 😕 А н…
❤1❤🔥1👏1
Как рекрутеру заработать вне найма Если вы давно думаете о подработке, но есть пара проблем: 🈁 какие навыки продавать как услугу? 🈁 как продавать эту услугу? 🈁 как превратить подработку его в системный доход? 😀 Приглашаем на воркшоп «Как HR выйти на дополнительный доход» 28–30 апреля Вас ждут: ⚡️ 3 практических встречи с разбором актуальных вопросов; ⚡️ понятный план действий по выходу на фриланс на ближайшие 2–4 …
👏1
Я долго не закрываю вакансии = я плохо работаю Пост-поддержка для тех, кто регулярно проживает это чувство ❤️ Напоминаем: результат в рекрутинге зависит не только от вас. Напоминаем еще: есть рынок, конкуренция, условия вакансии, пожелания заказчика. Это не значит, что не нужно анализировать свою работу. Нужно. Но важно отличать зоны контроля от того, на что вы не влияете. Хороший рекрутер — это не тот, кто всег…
❤4💯1
Я долго не могу закрыть вакансию = я плохой рекрутер Было?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кандидаты не хотят общаться по телефону: как их разговорить Многие рекрутеры сейчас избегают звонков. И кандидаты тоже. Причины всем известны: не понимают, зачем звонок, боятся «допросаю, им неудобно сейчас говорить. Но если, как мы уже писали здесь, пришлось? Что делать: Объясните ценность звонка ❌ Давайте созвонимся ✔️ Хочу за 10 минут рассказать детали, которых нет в описании Ограничьте время, это снижает ур…
❤5🔥1
Рубрика: найди ошибку Ваши варианты 👇🏻
Ловите еще мини-разбор писем от рекрутеров 🔥 Это, кстати, был кусочек из мастер-класса «Прожарка писем». Его можно приобрести и посмотреть в любой удобный момент) На мастер-классе айтишники разбирают реальные сообщения от рекрутеров и поясняют, почему они бы ответили или не ответили на сообщение.
👍2❤1
Интересны такие разборы?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Читают, но не отвечают — почему? 🙂 Наглядное пособие из реальной переписки. Смотрим. Запоминаем. Не повторяем. 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 ⚡️ Курс «Профессия ИТ-рекрутер 3.0» ⚡️ Отзывы на курс «Профессия ИТ-рекрутер 3.0»
Пост для тех, кто в поиске работы. Можно поделиться своим резюме Если сейчас ищите кого-то в команду, тоже можно написать, вдруг кто-то знает таких спецов и сможет вам помочь 👍
Вы поиске работы? Пост для вас 🔥 Кидайте в комментарии свои резюме, ссылки на сайты или просто пишите: кто вы, что умеете, на какую должность имеете виды, как с вами связаться. Сообщение, кстати, так и начните — с должности, опыта и предполагаемой занятости. Например: Рекрутер в финтех-компанию, опыт 5 лет, полный день. Бонусом разберу ваши резюме голосовыми сообщениями и подскажу, что исправить и улучшить 👍
🟢 Топ ошибок в сообщениях: тема, персонализация, задачи, объем текста, мотивация вам отвечать (точнее ее отсутствие) Часть можно посмотреть на видео. Подробно все вопросы коммуникации разбираем на курсе «Профессия ИТ-рекрутер 3.0»: ⚫️ Основные правила коммуникации с кандидатом 🔵 Телефонное интервью, скрипт ⚫️ Скайп интервью: проверяем «твердые» и «мягкие» навыки 🔵 Завершение работы с кандидатом. Офер, контрофер, от…
🙏2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @recruitment_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я долго не могу закрыть вакансию = я плохой рекрутер Было?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Интересны такие разборы?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 19 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 385,069 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IT-рекрутмент с нуля” (@recruitment_0), 1,055 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/recruitment_0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.