Channel
@recensionesmart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,301subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001400561502 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @recensionesmart |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/recensionesmart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 5,301 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 5,307 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 5,313 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 5,315 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🚨 È ARRIVATA LA NUOVA DR 5 🚨 B-SUV benzina/GPL sotto i 20.000€ chiavi in mano, infotainment da 26", consumi reali 5,7 l/100km e dotazione completa. L’abbiamo provata su strada senza filtri. 💥 💣 È davvero la migliore alternativa economica del 2025? Ci sono PRO molto forti… ma anche difetti importanti. 👇 Articolo completo qui 👇 🔗 NUOVA DR 5 – Prova completa, consumi reali e prezzi
BYD Dolphin Surf: l’elettrica che sta facendo impazzire l’Europa 😳 Costa meno di quanto pensi e offre più di tante “premium”. 👉 https://www.recensionesmart.it/byd-dolphin-surf-recensione-prova-su-strada/
JAECOO 7 - SI PENTE dopo solo 20.000km? PARLA IL PROPRIETARIO - PROBLEMI e OPINIONI 👉 https://youtu.be/6Wg5oekBEtQ
⚡️ Oggi abbiamo provato la Tesla Model Y RWD Base! Prezzi, consumi, PRO e CONTRO: sarà davvero l’elettrica giusta per dire addio al termico?⚡️ Oggi abbiamo provato la Tesla Model Y RWD Base! Prezzi, consumi, PRO e CONTRO: sarà davvero l’elettrica giusta per dire addio al termico? 👉https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9aabyCPcKE
🚙 Dacia Duster: ha davvero senso? Un proprietario racconta pregi e difetti reali. 👉 Video completo: https://youtu.be/htaAatEB7DQ
🚨 Questa NON è più la #Clio che conoscevamo! La nuova #Renault Clio 2025 ha cambiato tutto: design aggressivo, interni con Google integrato e un ibrido che promette consumi record. Vuoi vedere come è diventata? 👉https://www.recensionesmart.it/nuova-renault-clio-2025-design-motori-e-tecnologia/
Prova #SPORTEQUIPE 7 GTV – Design, guida e dotazioni del SUV premium DR 👉https://www.recensionesmart.it/sportequipe-7-gtv-prova-su-strada/
Xpeng G6: la nuova auto elettrica cinese che sfida Tesla in Italia 👉https://www.recensionesmart.it/xpeng-g6-recensione-prova-prezzo-autonomia/ #xpeng #auto #autoelettrica
40.000 km con TESLA e PENTITO dell’elettrico? PROBLEMI e COSTI DI GESTIONE - PARLA IL PROPRIETARIO 👉 https://youtu.be/RQBLQaaWIJA
AUDI A3 - PROBLEMI e OPINIONI dopo 250.000km - PARLA IL PROPRIETARI 👉 https://youtu.be/9TBn8pkeQhQ
Tiger 6 – Il nuovo SUV premium del Gruppo DR 👉 https://www.recensionesmart.it/tiger-6/
ICH-X K3: Stile Avventuroso, Anima Urbana, Prezzo Leggero 👉https://www.recensionesmart.it/ich-x-k3-fuoristrada-versatile/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @recensionesmart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 503,824 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Recensionesmart Auto e Test Drive” (@recensionesmart), 5,301 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/recensionesmart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.