速度!!!
Signed 热宝

Channel
@rebaorebao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
1,982subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002419784858 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rebaorebao |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rebaorebao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 1,982 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 1,986 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 1,993 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 2,000 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 2,001 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 2,006 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 2,003 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 2,008 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 2,007 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 2,007 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
50 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 50.0% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 14.0% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 14.0% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rebaorebao. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2026 to 11 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
速度!!!
Signed 热宝
https://inv.debot.ai/r/224456?lang=zh打起十二分精神扫robinhood
❤2
Signed 热宝
最近Robin Hood 链很火热啊,有需要开通debot 返佣的可以找我嗷
Signed 热宝
https://x.com/hotbabyrebao/status/2074839974944690471?s=46ADI公链可以看看,世界杯热点,币圈难得的叙事和热度
❤1
Signed 热宝
开蓝v只要4.5刀
🔥3
Signed 热宝
https://x.com/hotbabyrebao/status/2071938524702757296?s=46
❤1
Signed 热宝
https://x.com/hotbabyrebao/status/2070877018468790561?s=46
Signed 热宝
https://x.com/hotbabyrebao/status/2070824033562845243?s=46
Signed 热宝
https://x.com/verityx2qb?s=21关注一下我妹妹呀
Signed 热宝
0xb42ea00b9b2706575bfbfb50995277e5f09cffff 这个币叫慢鱼。奖励长期主义的人 现在市场太浮躁了 这叙事我觉得不错 说要拉100倍 可以一起参与~
💩7
Signed 热宝
其实自从我做交易以后,我对此有了很深的感悟。 交易就像一面镜子,完完整整照出了我所有的不完美: 我会急于求成,选不到优质的进场时机;很多时候,因为点位选择失当,最终不得不面对亏损的结果。 直到张老师在直播里讲透一句话: “你只要把进场点位,做在庄家扫不到你的位置,那就是好位置。到了那个点位,行情无论往上还是往下,你唯一要做的,就是守住保本,剩下的,全交给市场给你的馈赠。” 一开始,我其实并没有太深的体会。 直到后来,我真正按照老师的逻辑去实操,才发现果然如此。 也是从那个时候开始,我才真正明白: 钱,从来不是靠蛮力挣来的。 它本质上,是一个人认知与秩序的显化结果。 俗话说,投资是认知的变现。 一个人的认知如果在线,自然会慢慢转化成等价的财富;如果认知不到位,终究还是会为自己的无知与懈怠买单。 而这个道理,其实不止适用于交易。 往后不管面对交易,还是任何行业、任何关系,如果你把它当成一份天职去看待,你就会带着一种…
👏4❤3👍1🔥1
Signed 热宝
https://x.com/hotbabyrebao/status/2067905932038905915?s=46 90%的人都不知道的算力真相,炒美股的宝子可以看看
Signed 热宝
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rebaorebao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“热镰刀日常” (@rebaorebao), 1,982 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rebaorebao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.