Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Artem's DeFi

Channel

Artem's DeFi

@rebalancefin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

41,266subscribers

-1,250 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002052635446
TypeChannel
Username@rebalancefin
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rebalancefin

Growth

41,26642,51641,8917 August 2026 — 42,516 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,481 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,432 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,367 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,283 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,215 subscribers13 August 2026 — 42,183 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,124 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,035 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,983 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,929 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,871 subscribers20 August 2026 — 41,834 subscribers21 August 2026 — 41,783 subscribers23 August 2026 — 41,707 subscribers24 August 2026 — 41,574 subscribers25 August 2026 — 41,553 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,496 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,464 subscribers28 August 2026 — 41,398 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,333 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,266 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -1,250. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,079–42,704 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 13:3641,266-67
29 Aug 2026, 12:5341,333-65
28 Aug 2026, 16:0541,398-66
27 Aug 2026, 15:1241,464-32
26 Aug 2026, 13:2541,496-57
25 Aug 2026, 15:5341,553-21
24 Aug 2026, 18:4441,574-133
23 Aug 2026, 00:4441,707-76
21 Aug 2026, 13:1241,783-51
20 Aug 2026, 14:3441,834-37
19 Aug 2026, 15:4341,871-58
18 Aug 2026, 14:1341,929-54
17 Aug 2026, 14:2541,983-52
16 Aug 2026, 09:0642,035-89
14 Aug 2026, 23:2642,124-59
13 Aug 2026, 11:2642,183-32
12 Aug 2026, 13:3442,215-68
11 Aug 2026, 10:3242,283-84
10 Aug 2026, 10:2742,367-65
9 Aug 2026, 08:1442,432first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 2 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.276%
avg views ÷ 41,266 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held21 (2 September 202510 August 2026)
Views total114
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
375.0%
👍125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC114 viewsread 30 August 2026

Liquidity mismatch in RWA vaults is a ticking bomb. Most protocols treat tokenized private credit or real estate as liquid collateral, but the underlying assets take months to liquidate. A sudden spike in redemptions creates a gap that the secondary market cannot fill instantly. If a major issuer defaults or a liquidity crunch hits, the vault cannot meet its obligations. The retail users and yield farmers holding the

25 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC226 viewsread 30 August 2026

The market is underpricing liquidity risk in RWA-backed vaults. RWAs can't be treated simply as crypto-collaterals. Most assume these assets are as liquid as the stables they mint, but the underlying real estate or credit is fundamentally illiquid. A sudden spike in redemption requests can force a fire sale of assets that cannot be liquidated in minutes. The LPs providing the initial liquidity buffers will hold the b

15 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC286 viewsread 30 August 2026

MiCA’s strict caps on non-euro stablecoin usage for payments are going to force a massive reshuffle in how European fintechs structure their liquidity. We are looking at a scenario where USDC or USDT simply cannot be the primary settlement layer for high-volume retail transactions within the bloc. This hits every payment aggregator and neo-bank trying to integrate on-chain rails today. If you are building a wallet o

11 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC282 viewsread 30 August 2026

Capital is moving from passive bank deposits into tokenized T-bills. This shift marks a transition from traditional custody to programmable yield. The structural driver is the push for 24/7 liquidity. Institutions no longer accept the T+2 settlement cycle when they can hold a digital representation of a sovereign bond and use it as collateral in a DeFi vault. The second order effect is the erosion of the traditiona

10 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC239 viewsread 30 August 2026

The 2010s e-money licensing wave followed a predictable script. First came the unregulated wrappers, then the regulatory arbitrage, and finally the institutional absorption once the cost of compliance became lower than the cost of risk. We are seeing the exact same play with RWA and on-chain credit. The current scramble for VARA licenses or MiCA compliance is just the professionalization phase of a cycle that started

7 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC218 viewsread 30 August 2026

Most RWA vaults are treating the liquidity of tokenized private credit as a given, which is a dangerous assumption when the underlying assets are fundamentally illiquid. We are seeing a trend where these assets are used as collateral in DeFi lending markets, but the liquidation mechanisms assume a depth of market that simply does not exist for private loans. If we hit a systemic credit event or a sudden spike in red

3 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC249 viewsread 30 August 2026

Is the multi-billion stablecoin hegemony about to face its final boss? 🧵 Most people use "stablecoins" and "tokenized deposits" interchangeably. But the mechanical differences change everything for global liquidity and the future of banking. Here’s why it matters: 1/ The Balance Sheet Matrix Stablecoins (USDT/USDC) are issued by non-banks. They isolate safe assets off-balance sheet. Tokenized Deposits are native ba

26 Jun 2026, 09:48 UTC297 views1 reactionsread 30 August 2026

The distinction between traditional asset management and on-chain finance is diminishing, yet the evolution is more nuanced than the mere introduction of ETFs. The industry is transitioning from simple price exposure to the functional replication of complex strategies. Examples such as tokenized equity indices and actively managed income ETFs demonstrate that the underlying infrastructure is finally maturing. Howeve

1

25 Jun 2026, 08:08 UTC262 viewsread 30 August 2026

Drop me crypto cards where you can spend from your balance while earning yield on it at the same time.

24 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC270 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026

The gap between the wild west of DeFi and the rigid world of traditional asset management is closing faster than most people realize, but it is happening in these weird, hybrid pockets. Seeing tokenized equity indices on Mantle or BlackRock layering options strategies onto Bitcoin ETFs shows that the goal isn't just getting capital on-chain, it is about replicating institutional product structures in a digital wrappe

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @rebalancefin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Sept 2025, 17:38 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

Are you interested in such low risk stable earnings?

  1. Yeah, I want more67%
  2. Nah, I'd like more risk but more profit33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Artem's DeFi” (@rebalancefin), 41,266 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rebalancefin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.