Травма коленного сустава на фронте — это серьёзное повреждение, требующее комплексного подхода к диагностике, лечению и реабилитации. В условиях боевых действий такие травмы часто сопровождаются сочетанными повреждениями (переломы, ранения мягких тканей), что усложняет оказание медицинской помощи. Диагностика: - Клинический осмотр: оценка боли, отёка, нестабильности сустава, ограничение движений. - Функциональные т…

Channel
Reaper Tactical
@reaper_tactical
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,628subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002021858574 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reaper_tactical |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reaper_tactical |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 1,628 | +8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 1,620 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 1,621 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 1,617 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:21 | 1,618 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 1,618 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.51%
- avg views ÷ 1,628 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 122
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.36%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,057 |
| Reactions total | 111 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 54s
- Average length
- 1m 59s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
60 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 29 | 48.3% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 13.3% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 13.3% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 11.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 8.33% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
По Крыму сейчас летят БПЛА, по Ялте сейчас пытаются бить БЭКами ВСУчки. УкроНАТОвская атака идёт при полной координации и разведке со стороны НАТО, НАТОвский самолёт разведчик сейчас работает по Крыму. Вопрос как долго будут пидоры летать и наводить, пятый год уже как никак летают.
💯6
Вот летели, летели и упали, а до этого только обломки долетали. Вот благодаря такой подаче информации и нет веры в СМИ у здравомыслящих людей. Пишите как есть уже, а то упали, падает сами знаете что при виде страшилища, а это прилетели.
💯6
Доброе тактикульное
🤣7
Жили да поживали склады и логистический хаб укронацистов, в районе города Бровары Киевской области. Но в один прекрасный момент, под Киевом «Герани» расцвели и стало ярко и красиво 🤗
Ровно два года назад началось вторжение войск укропидарасов в том числе офицеров и солдат НАТО замаскированных под наёмников в Курскую область. Наш админ тогда видя туман войны и горы лжи в интернете от блохеров, написал как есть: КПП "Суджа" наши пограничники герои.🙏🙏🙏 Теперь по вторжению на территорию нашей страны, кадровых частей 404: Сейчас на Курском направлении "Туман войны" и мы не будем разгонять панику, т…
💯4👍2
Лечение повреждений мениска в военно-полевых условиях требует особого подхода, учитывающего ограниченность ресурсов и необходимость максимально быстрой реабилитации военнослужащих. Современные методы ориентированы на минимально инвазивные технологии, которые можно применять даже вне крупных госпиталей. Основные принципы лечения В основе современной тактики лежит стремление сохранить мениск, поскольку его удаление в…
🔥4
ФСБ пресекла попытку теракта, который готовили три дибила по заданию укро-кураторов в Приморье. Целью теракта должен был стать объект Росгвардии: эти гении мысли собирали данные о военнослужащих, их автомобилях и местах парковки, чтобы впоследствии заложить там взрывчатку. Надо быть конченным дибилом чтоб повестись на укропидоров и работу подобную этой, теперь сидеть долго и упорно, жизнь себе и близким поломали.
💯4
В течение прошедшей ночи в период с 20.00 мск 5 августа до 8.00 мск 6 августа дежурными силами ПВО перехвачены и уничтожены 605 укранацистких БПЛА самолетного типа над территориями: Белгородской, Брянской, Владимирской, Воронежской, Калужской, Курской, Липецкой, Нижегородской, Орловской, Ростовской, Рязанской, Смоленской, Тамбовской, Тверской, Тульской, Ярославской областей, Московского региона, Краснодарского края, …
🚆 Прокладывая путь к победе: 175 лет Железнодорожным войскам 💪 Эти парни умеют делать невозможное: они поднимают сложные участки БАМа в лютые морозы и умеют за считанные часы собирать прямо на воде гигантские переправы, по которым идут тяжелые составы. 🪖 Сегодня они надежно обеспечивают логистику и снабжение нашей армии, а в зоне СВО идут едва ли не первыми, разминируют километры путей и подвозят всё необходимое…
👏3
Ещё три свинокорыта с боеприпасами для укровермахта, словили подарки с небес.
🔥4
Смотрим как активизировались спамеры и мошенники в каналах, с шлюхо-спам ботами и прочей хренью что пытаются увести аккаунты пользователей борьба простая, а пидоры что бегают по личкам и клянчат или типа продают это беда для невнимательных и не читающих предупреждения участников всех каналов. То что и нашему проекту, стали гадить, после серии постов, так значит мы делаем нужное дело и у некоторых пригорело, у нас с …
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @reaper_tactical. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 267,361 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reaper Tactical” (@reaper_tactical), 1,628 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reaper_tactical.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.