Channel
@real_top_design
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
2,082subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002565656233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @real_top_design |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/real_top_design |
Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @glavmo/4313231 Jul 2026, 06:27 UTC | @real_top_design/837 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 06:27 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @glavmo/431361 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC | @real_top_design/838 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @glavmo/431372 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC | @real_top_design/839 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @glavmo/431393 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC | @real_top_design/840 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @glavmo/431424 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC | @real_top_design/842 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @glavmo/431465 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC | @real_top_design/844 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @glavmo | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @glavmo (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @nedmos. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
2.2 average views per post against 2,082 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.106%. Across the 54,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.5% and 35.6%, with a median of 20.1%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 14 of 14 published in the window (14 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 31 |
| Mature posts only | 0.111% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 2,082 measured 10 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:rus · 54,164 channels · p10 5.33% · p25 10.5% · p50 20.1% · p75 35.6% · p90 57.1% |
| Position in cohort | 0.546th percentile · 1/200 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.139% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 2,082 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 2,092 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 2,094 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 2,094 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (26 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
✅ Сколько будут стоить новостройки в сентябре ➖ В сентябре средняя стоимость новой однокомнатной квартиры в Москве составит 14,5–16,2 млн рублей, двухкомнатной — 21,8–24,5 млн, а трехкомнатной — 29,5–33,5 млн рублей при росте цен на 0,8–1,5%. ➖ В Санкт-Петербурге аналогичное жилье обойдется в 9,6–10,8 млн, 14,5–16,3 млн и 19,8–22 млн рублей соответственно, где удорожание прогнозируется в пределах 0,5–1,0%, по данны…
✅ Владельцы квартир, сдающих их посуточно через площадки, рискуют получить доначисление налога до 40% от суммы — из-за одной детали, которую почти никто не проверяет ➖ Если оплата идет через агрегатор (Островок, Суточно.ру, Авито Путешествия), а налог вы платите только с суммы, что дошла до счета — за вычетом комиссии площадки в 15–20% — вы занижаете базу: налоговая считает доходом всю сумму, которую заплатил гость,…
Московский фонд реновации впервые возглавил список крупнейших застройщиков жилья Москвы, а в целом по России занял третье место Как следует из обнародованного сегодня Единым ресурсом застройщиков традиционного рейтинга, к началу августа 2026 года первое место по объемам строительства в столице занял Московский фонд реновации, у которого на этапе возведения сейчас находится 3,65 млн кв. м. Месяц назад фонд занимал 14…
Photo, posted without a caption
✅ Завышение цены в договоре купли-продажи квартиры: в чём риск для продавца ➖ При продаже недвижимости покупатели иногда просят указать в договоре цену выше фактической — например, вместо реальных 10 млн рублей прописать 13 млн. Такая схема используется, когда у покупателя не хватает средств на первоначальный взнос по ипотеке: недостающая сумма оформляется распиской как якобы уже переданный задаток, а банк формально…
🛜В Госдуме предложили увеличить выплаты на погашение ипотеки при рождении детей Инициатива предусматривает прогрессивную поддержку: 500 тыс. рублей за первого ребенка, 600 тыс. — за второго и 700 тыс. — за третьего. В сумме многодетная семья сможет получить 1,8 млн рублей на погашение ипотеки. Также предлагается сделать материнский капитал прогрессивным, увеличивая выплаты с рождением каждого следующего ребенка.
🛜Москва — лидер по росту цен на новостройки среди миллионников За год стоимость квадратного метра в столице выросла на 24,8% — до 734,8 тыс. рублей. В тройку лидеров также вошли Челябинск (+23,5%) и Санкт-Петербург (+23,3%). В среднем по городам-миллионникам новостройки подорожали на 12,4%, а Москва по-прежнему остается самым дорогим рынком жилья в стране.
Московские власти выставили на продажу целый первый этаж усадьбы Демидова — Рахмановых. Старинное здание XVIII века находится на Яузской улице, по соседству с высоткой на Котельнической набережной. За 470 м² выставили начальную цену в ₽116 миллионов. Новый собственник сможет открыть здесь ресторан или устроить офис.
✅ Как получить гарантированный рост цены на квартиру в Москве ➖ Речь о покупке жилья в зонах комплексного развития территорий (КРТ). Это не реновация и не флиппинг, а масштабное преображение промзон в современные кварталы с развитой инфраструктурой. Яркий пример — площадка завода ЗИЛ: квартиры в ЖК «ЗИЛАРТ» за несколько лет подорожали с 5–6 млн до ~18 млн рублей. ➖ При этом цены в подобных локациях остаются ниже, ч…
Posted without readable text
Жители ЖК «Середневский лес» в Новой Москве сообщили о проблемах с доступом в подъезды после отключения света. Жители ЖК «Середневский лес» сообщили «Осторожно, Москва» о сбоях в работе системы доступа в подъезды в ночь с 10 на 11 июля после вечернего отключения электроэнергии. По словам одной из жительниц, около 22:00 перестали работать магнитные ключи, коды для входа и открытие дверей через приложение. Некоторым ж…
Только один банк снизил ставки по рыночной ипотеке на прошлой неделе. На те же 0,25%, что и ЦБ.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @real_top_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Недвижимость / Дизайн №166” (@real_top_design), 2,082 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/real_top_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.