Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Rahenan

@rahenan_app

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,554subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003546769549
TypeChannel
Username@rahenan_app
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 15 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rahenan_app

Growth

1,5541,5771,565.56 August 2026 — 1,576 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,576 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,577 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,568 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,554 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,551–1,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:071,554-14
10 Aug 2026, 04:311,568-9
7 Aug 2026, 08:401,577+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:001,576no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:481,576first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.0%
avg views ÷ 1,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
653
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held15 (15 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total2,610
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

426 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22452.6%
👏7517.6%
❤‍🔥327.51%
🔥307.04%
💯163.76%
🤩92.11%
👀81.88%
😁51.17%
😍51.17%
😱51.17%
🤯40.939%
🤝30.704%
🥰30.704%
🫡30.704%
👍20.469%
10.235%
👌10.235%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 426reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC345 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ڕاهێنان ئێستا دەتوانێت بە خشتە زانیارییەکانت بۆ ڕێکبخات. 🪄 تەنها داوا بکە و ئەویش جێبەجێی دەکات. 🐶 —- www.rahenan.app

❤‍🔥3💯1

30 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC651 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ئێستا دەتوانیت ڕوونکردنەوە بە هێڵکاری ببینیت لەناو ئەپی ڕاهێنان. 🚀 بینەری ئەم نموونەیە بن. 😊

🔥10🤯2💯1

27 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC691 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تایبەتمەندی نوێ! 📣 ڕاهێنان ئێستا دەتوانێت بە هێڵکاری بابەتەکانت بۆ ڕوون بکاتەوە.🧬 جگە لەوە، لە وانەی کیمیا دەتوانێت شێوەی پێکهاتەکانت پشان بدات. 🧪 ڕاهێنان مامۆستای تایبەتی تۆیە. ⭐️ — ئەم تایبەتمەندیانە لە ئەپدەیتی نوێی ئەپەکە بەردەست دەبن کە ئەم هەفتەیە بڵاودەبێتەوە.

5🔥2🤯1😱1

22 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC923 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

نمرەی یەکێک لە بەکارهێنەرانی ئەپی ڕاهێنان کە لە سێ وانە نمرەی ١٠٠ ی هێناوە و لە زمانی خۆیەوە دەڵێت: ڕاهێنان هاوکارێکی زۆر باشی تەلەبەیە ، هەم هاوڕێیەکی باش هەم مامۆستایەکی نموونەی هیوای سەرکەوتن بۆ ئەم بەڕێزە و ئێوەش دەخوازین. 💐 ڕاهێنان هەمیشە ئامادەیە بۆ پرسیارەکانت. 🧠

12💯3🔥3🤩3👍2

9 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC≈1,400 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ئەگەر تۆ نمرەی بەرزت هێناوە و ئەپی ڕاهێنان هاوکارت بووە لە خوێندن، پەیوەندیمان پێوە بکە، پاداشتی داراییمان هەیە بۆت. 💵💰 👇 @rahenan_support

👏84🤝3👀2

1 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,880 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ئەمڕۆ سەرەتای مانگێکی نوێیە، واتە هەموو بەکارهێنەرانی ئەپی ڕاهێنان ١٥ نامەی بێبەرامبەر وەردەگرن. 🎁 ڕاهێنان ئامادەیە بۆ هاوکاریت. وێنەیەکی پرسیارەکەت بنێرە. 📷✅ www.rahenan.app

13🥰2👏1

17 Jun 2026, 15:10 UTC≈3,560 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ڕۆژانە چەندین نامەی لەم شێوەیەمان پێدەگات و زۆر خۆشحاڵمان دەکات. سوپاس کە تا ئێستا لەگەڵمانن. ❤️

16

11 Jun 2026, 13:35 UTC≈3,860 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💳 ئێستا دەتوانیت بە هەریەک لە FIB یاخود FastPay ڕاستەوخۆ لەناو ئەپەکە پارەی بەشداریکردن بدەیت. بۆ هەر پرسیارێک تکایە ڕاستەوخۆ نامەمان بۆ بنێرە. @rahenan_support — 💡پێتان چۆنە بەم نزیکانە ڕاهێنان بتوانێت لەسەر داوای تۆ مەلزەمە دروست بکات بە PDF؟ واتە تۆ تەنها بەشەکان هەلبژێرە و ڕاهێنان بەپێی داخوازی تۆ مەلزەمەیەکی ڕێکت بۆ دروست دەکات بە چەند چرکەیەک لەسەر بنەمای زانیاری ناو کتێبەکەت.

❤‍🔥176👏6💯1

4 Jun 2026, 09:46 UTC≈3,000 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تەنها لە چەند مانگی ڕابردوودا ئەپی ڕاهێنان زیاتر لە ١٦٠،٠٠٠ پرسیاری قوتابیانی وەڵامداوەتەوە. 😱 قوتابیان لە هەموو شار و گوندەکانی کوردستانەوە بەشدارن و زانیاری کوالێتی بەرزیان پێگەیشتووە.🌟 ئێمە بەم جۆرە خزمەتی خەڵکی خۆمان دەکەین. ❤️ — هاوکارمان بە لە بڵاوکردنەوەی ئەپەکە و بۆ ٣ هاوڕێتی بنێرە. www.rahenan.app

30💯9

30 May 2026, 14:48 UTC≈2,510 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ئێستا دەتوانیت داوا بکەیت ڕاهێنان بە کورتی وەڵامەکەت بۆ بنووسێت. ئەمە بۆ کاتێک باشە کە شیکاری هەنگاو بە هەنگاو و درێژت نەوێت. — ڕاهێنان بەهێزترین ئەپی ژیری دەستکردە بۆ مەنهەجی خوێندنی کوردستان. www.rahenan.app

16😁1

28 May 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,290 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ڕاهێنان بە دەنگ چۆنە؟ 🔊 لەم ڤیدیۆیە گوێبیستی نموونەیەک بە. ڕاهێنان بەهێزترین ئەپی ژیریی دەستکردە بۆ مەنهەجی خوێندن لە کوردستان. هێشتا سەرەتایە. 💪 — جەژنتان پیرۆز. ❤️

26❤‍🔥6👏4😁4😍2🔥1🤩1

23 Apr 2026, 14:43 UTC≈2,650 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ڕاهێنان بە دەنگ؟ 🔈 بەم نزیکانە… 🤫

👏3913🤩5🔥4❤‍🔥1👌1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rahenan_app. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,060,300 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rahenan” (@rahenan_app), 1,554 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rahenan_app.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.