Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for /r/Jokes

Channel

/r/Jokes

@r_jokes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,709subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001053157515
TypeChannel
Username@r_jokes
Created11 September 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/r_jokes

Growth

1,7091,7131,7115 August 2026 — 1,713 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,713 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,712 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,711 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,712 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,711 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,710 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,709 subscribers5 August 202625 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,708–1,714 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 05:371,709-1
22 Aug 2026, 11:521,710-1
18 Aug 2026, 15:451,711-1
15 Aug 2026, 18:331,712+1
12 Aug 2026, 10:541,711-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:101,712-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:061,713no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:201,713first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.93%
avg views ÷ 1,709 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.0
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held31 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,550
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC15 viewsread 7 August 2026

Two brothers are laid off from work and go to the unemployment office. The two of them apply for unemployment. The first brother is asked his occupation to which he replies, "I am a panty stitcher. I sew pantyhose for women." The clerk looks up his occupation and finds it to be unskilled labour. He gives the brother $300 a week for unemployment. The clerk asks the second brother his occupation and he says, "Diesel

7 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC28 viewsread 7 August 2026

Oldie but a goodie So this old grungy man stumbles into the Catholic church and heads for the confessional - the Priest enters - blesses this man and asks how may I help. And the man proceeds to tell about this beautiful woman he has met and that they're having just the best time romping in bed for days. And the Priest asks if they are married to which the old man confesses no, they're not. So the Priest suggests

7 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC36 viewsread 7 August 2026

How much for the horse tornado? \- Sir, that is a carousel \- I MUST HAVE IT https://redd.it/1vhrwc5 @r_jokes

7 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC42 viewsread 7 August 2026

An infinite number of mathematics walk into a bar. The first one asks for a beer. The second one asks for half a beer. The third one asks for 1/4 of a beer. Before the next one can open their mouth, the bartender pours two beers and walks away. https://redd.it/1vhi2dj @r_jokes

7 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC46 viewsread 7 August 2026

A guy who stuttered died in prison before he could even finish his sentence https://redd.it/1vhk9p6 @r_jokes

7 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC44 viewsread 7 August 2026

I once was asked by a mummy for some money but I declined. It was probably for a pyramid scheme. https://redd.it/1vhg48r @r_jokes

6 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026

What’s green and fuzzy, has four legs, and will kill you if it falls out of a tree? A pool table. https://redd.it/1vh9egj @r_jokes

6 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC48 viewsread 7 August 2026

Wife told me sex is better on vacation Worst postcard I’ve ever received. https://redd.it/1vh29gr @r_jokes

6 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC51 viewsread 7 August 2026

Two men are waiting for a train. The younger man asks the older man for the time, but the older man ignores him. After a while, the younger man again asks for the time and again the older man ignores him. Frustrated, the younger man finally asks, “Why won’t you answer me when I ask you for the time?” The older man sighs and explains: “Look, if I tell you the time, we’ll start to talk. Then when the train comes, you

6 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC49 viewsread 7 August 2026

I asked a surly Dutch shopkeeper if he sold clogs. He said, "Oh, you'd like that, wooden shoe?" https://redd.it/1vgzb2f @r_jokes

6 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC53 viewsread 7 August 2026

My wife said she always dreamed of getting marrried in a castle, so I secretly arranged it... Come the big day though, and you wouldn't have known it from the look on her face as we were bouncing around. https://redd.it/1vgvm6s @r_jokes

6 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC56 viewsread 7 August 2026

I like my women the same way i like my laptop On my lap turned on, and virus free https://redd.it/1vghvkk @r_jokes

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @r_jokes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,562,313 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“/r/Jokes” (@r_jokes), 1,709 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r_jokes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.