Channel
@qxxwcg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50,503subscribers
+5,683 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002962406664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qxxwcg |
| Description | 商务： @mshk66 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qxxwcg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:24 | 50,503 | -293 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:05 | 50,796 | -207 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 51,003 | -118 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 51,121 | -269 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 51,390 | -264 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 51,654 | -57 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 51,711 | -115 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 51,826 | -335 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 52,161 | -226 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 52,387 | -204 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 52,591 | -244 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 52,835 | -413 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 53,248 | -337 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 53,585 | -6,057 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 59,642 | -1,322 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 60,964 | -2,080 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 63,044 | -421 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 63,465 | -636 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 64,101 | -608 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 64,709 | first reading |
186 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 186 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 186 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 157,223 |
| Reactions total | 1,176 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 05:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,176 reactions across 3 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😈 | 120 | 10.2% | |
| 🤮 | 117 | 9.95% | |
| 🖕 | 115 | 9.78% | |
| 💩 | 110 | 9.35% | |
| 😡 | 107 | 9.10% | |
| 🥱 | 107 | 9.10% | |
| 😢 | 104 | 8.84% | |
| 🍌 | 103 | 8.76% | |
| 👎 | 98 | 8.33% | |
| 🤬 | 97 | 8.25% | |
| 💔 | 96 | 8.16% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0.085% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.085% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 186 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 186 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
近年来，东南亚部分地区，尤其是柬埔寨，因网络诈骗事件备受关注，但我们必须摈弃将所有在当地的中国人一概而论的偏见。实际上，绝大多数中国公民在东盟国家都在进行合法的经营、投资、工作和旅游，为当地社会和经济发展做出了重要贡献。 中国投资者和从业者活跃于基础设施建设、制造业、农业、旅游和零售等多个领域，不仅促进了经济增长，还创造了大量就业机会和税收收入。网络诈骗是由跨国犯罪团伙所为，不能简单地与某个国家或群体绑定。混淆守法公民与违法者的界限，只会加深误解，阻碍社会和谐与跨国交流。 东盟国家及柬埔寨政府坚持依法严厉打击诈骗犯罪，同时也肩负保护合法外籍人员权益和安全的责任。唯有树立客观理性的认知，区分守法公民与犯罪分子，依托法治精神，才能有效打击违法行为，强化区域合作，筑牢互信基础。
刘忍被抓回国，拖欠2万美元运费 “这批沙发原本是给KTV买的，货已经到了，老板却被抓回国了，前后还欠我们大约2万美元运费，估计很难要回来了。” 走进吴先生位于金边的物流仓库，一排排货物映入眼帘：沙发、洗衣机、净水器、鱼缸、篮球架、保险柜、三轮车、高尔夫球车、高速网线……品类繁杂，堆积如山。 其中，一批原本为KTV采购的沙发，收货人是一名刘姓大佬。据吴先生介绍，对方后来在柬埔寨被抓回国，仅这批沙发就拖欠1.1万美元运费，加上此前欠下的其他费用，累计欠款约2万美元。
河北邯郸临漳警方捣毁一养老诈骗窝点，抓获17名涉案人员！ 据邯郸市公安局8月25日通报，在当地开展的“零点行动”专项打击中，临漳县公安局刑侦大队重案中队工作中发现，当地一家对外招聘电话客服的公司提成异常，经多日摸排核实，确认这是一处藏匿于居民楼内、专门针对老年人实施虚假保健品营销的诈骗窝点。 8月17日警方开展集中收网行动，现场抓获涉案人员17名，查获电脑21台、手机19部以及一批用于诈骗的劣质产品。 经查，犯罪嫌疑人王某某自2024年起，通过非法渠道购买老年人个人信息，通过电销模式，冒充“福利中心”工作人员，使用成套话术脚本，将牦牛奶、藏药蛇骨膏、中药磁疗枕等劣质商品吹嘘为保健神品，高价向老年群体推销，骗取老年人养老积蓄。 目前13名涉案人员已被采取刑事强制措施，案件正在进一步办理当中。
遵照柬埔寨国家警察总监及马德望省警局部署，当地缉毒、司法警力联合派出所开展突击缉毒行动，在拉丹蒙杜尔县斯陶乡敦梅村水泥厂前查处一起非法持毒案件。 行动当场抓获两名本地男子，现场查获3袋冰毒、吸毒用具、2部涉案手机及2辆涉案车辆。 目前两名嫌疑人已被警方扣押，相关证据及案件材料正在整理，后续将移交省级部门立案追责。
俄驻柬使馆辟谣：普京指责柬埔寨忘恩负义为网络假消息 俄罗斯驻柬埔寨大使馆近期针对社交平台流传的不实传闻公开发表声明，辟谣有关普京总统指责柬埔寨“忘恩负义”、拒绝向柬提供支持的说法，指出该消息完全属于人为捏造，违背俄柬两国双边关系的实际精神。 使馆在声明中回顾，俄罗斯曾在柬埔寨解放之后，为当地战后重建工作提供过相关支持。普京在喀山东盟峰会与洪玛奈会晤期间，也明确表态俄方会持续为柬埔寨提供专业人才培训，进一步拓展双方商业合作往来。使馆呼吁广大民众务必甄别网络资讯，核对信息来源，不要转发传播未经证实的虚假内容，避免谣言扩散破坏两国友好关系。
此人在柬埔寨波哥山当扶手 当小三，后面被发现 就打算跟她断了 但是她就一直纠缠不休 已死相逼 没办法肯定要顾自己老婆 。 然后肖思欣就起了歹心 跑到马来西亚找这个男人，结果男人要放弃她 因为男人觉得家庭重要 ，又不想伤害那么严重 就叫自己兄弟给她在包厢上了，结果还是耍不掉，就各种去威胁此男人的老婆和家人。事情过去了半年 又找上门来。 因为男人事业低落因此无法给她太多的钱 然后就狮子大开口 要男人找自己老婆要5万u，然后此男老婆也没有多余的💰 因为还要养孩子，这个女的还是不死心，一再骚扰家人 希望看到这个女的。 PS：聊天记录有点炸裂💥 又是舔13又是PYZ 这年头小三圈子也卷的很。
柬埔寨税务总局税务犯罪调查部门副主任杜万迪近日提醒，虚假发票可能涉及逃税、虚假抵扣甚至洗钱。 虚假发票分三类：无真实交易虚开、金额与实际不符、买卖发票。往往涉及开票方、使用方、会计、中间人等多环节，可用于降低计税基础、抵扣增值税或隐藏非法资金来源。 税务部门提醒，即便企业不知情接收虚假发票也可能受影响。建议核实供应商信息，保存合同和付款凭证，优先银行转账，发现异常及时核查。此次为风险提示，非新政策或专项行动。
磅士卑省等多地宪兵联合行动：6名嫌疑人被捕，查获近200部手机 近日，柬埔寨磅士卑省宪兵队联合金边市、柴桢省及西哈努克省宪兵队，开展针对盗窃及涉嫌窝藏、销售赃物行为的调查行动。 行动期间，执法人员共逮捕6名嫌疑人，并现场查获近200部手机。相关人员及涉案物品目前已被依法控制，案件仍在进一步调查处理中。 据初步调查，其中两名嫌疑人经营一家名为金鹤”（Kim Hak）的手机店。该店位于金边市鲁西乔区图桑凯分区599号街。 警方确认，两名涉案人员分别为40岁的谢金鹤（Chea Kim Hak）和31岁的金腾（Kim Theng），两人以手机销售为业。 据悉，两名嫌疑人的登记住址位于金边市普诺区普诺分区波蒙坤村5号街30号。 目前，柬埔寨警方正对查获手机的来源、交易情况以及6名嫌疑人与此前发生的盗窃案件之间是否存在关联展开进一步调查。后续如有新的调查结果，相关部门或将依法公布。
木牌园区左手边这个新开的酒店，现在很多警察在道子里面，这个酒店已经是危了
英国印太事务大臣走访柬边境社区，承诺持续帮扶当地儿童教育事业 2026年，英国印太事务大臣温特顿女男爵到访柬埔寨奥多棉吉省戈巴萨村，实地走访受边境局势波及的当地社区。她现场视察由英国出资扶持的教育援助项目，与当地孩童以及居民面对面交流，了解孩子们的就学现状。 此外温特顿女男爵还和该省省长蝉雅达举行会谈，双方探讨后续合作方向，英方表态将持续帮扶受冲突影响的社区，保障当地儿童可以正常接受教育。英方对外发布声明，还提出会继续推动柬埔寨与泰国开展和平对话，缓和边境紧张态势。边境动荡极易冲击基础教育，外部援助能够缓解民生压力，但地区长久安定仍有赖双边沟通协商。
木牌发生绑架及洗钱案，中国籍嫌疑人遭CID追捕 8月30日，柬埔寨柴桢省巴域市（Bavet City）发生一起涉及绑架及洗钱的案件。据初步消息，柬埔寨刑事调查部门（CID）目前正在追捕一名涉嫌参与该案件的中国籍犯罪嫌疑人。案件发生后，相关执法人员已展开调查，并对涉案人员及相关线索进行追查。 目前，该名中国籍嫌疑人的具体身份及下落尚未进一步公开，案件详细经过以及是否还有其他涉案人员，仍有待警方进一步调查确认。
在东亚一直偶尔玩点足球，赢过大钱也输过大钱，之前玩的台子关了，自己在网上找到这家迪威娱乐城，想着迪威在西港也是有点实力的，就注册了。第一天aba充值100，提现1104u，很快就到了，觉得台子没问题。昨晚充值200，提现9860（合计1400多u）等到今天睡醒一直没给我出，联系客服打枪那套话术用到我身上了，说什么投注有问题，提现了之后没有充值怎么还有钱投注？我就笑了，账户的盈利我没有提完，提了9860，剩1000不能继续投注了？尼玛的你要打我的枪麻烦你用点心找个好点的理由！你们他妈的是活不起了吗？没实力办什么台子！大家千万避雷！
Showing the 12 most recent of 186 posts we hold for @qxxwcg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨泰国每日新闻-资讯-八卦” (@qxxwcg), 50,503 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qxxwcg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.