Channel
@quantumaeternaqa
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
4,431subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002573641652 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quantumaeternaqa |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quantumaeternaqa |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
7.5 average views per post against 4,431 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.169%. Across the 574 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,172–9,867 subscribers, posting mainly in Italian — the middle half sit between 9.29% and 27.1%, with a median of 17.2%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 25 of 25 published in the window (25 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 187 |
| Mature posts only | 0.188% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 4,431 measured 11 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:ita · 574 channels · p10 4.25% · p25 9.29% · p50 17.2% · p75 27.1% · p90 42.1% |
| Position in cohort | 0.349th percentile · 1/100 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.065% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Italian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 4,431 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 4,439 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 4,439 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (6 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 187 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 95.0% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏦 LA BANCA TI DÀ IL 2% L’ANNO… ANCHE SE I TUOI SOLDI RESTANO FERMI. E spesso ti chiede di lasciarli vincolati per mesi o anni. Se hai bisogno di ritirarli prima? ❌ Rendimenti ridotti ❌ Possibili penali ❌ Nessuna flessibilità Noi crediamo che debba essere diverso. 👇 🚀 Con QuantumAeterna: ✅ Nessun costo di ingresso ✅ Nessun vincolo sul capitale ✅ Parti con poco capitale ✅ Assistenza reale ogni giorno 📊 Da oltre …
❤1
🎥 La voce di chi ha già iniziato Nel video che vedi qui sopra parla un cliente, una persona normale che ha deciso di provare il servizio senza promesse assurde, ma con un metodo chiaro. Racconta: • perché ha scelto di non fare trading da sola • come si sente ad avere un supporto costante • e cosa significa vedere risultati concreti, passo dopo passo 👉 Nessun “guru”, nessuna magia. Solo risultati reali, persone rea…
❤1
📊 Un po’ di contesto sul nostro servizio Molti qui dentro vedono risultati e screen, ma è giusto spiegare da dove arrivano. Il nostro team è presente sul settore da giugno 2018 e, da allora: • ogni mese è stato chiuso in profitto • decine di migliaia di € di profitto complessivo generato • conti reali e verificabili, mai modificati Non parliamo di operazioni fortunate, ma di un lavoro costante basato su metodo, ge…
❤1
📊 Un po’ di contesto sul nostro servizio Molti qui dentro vedono risultati e screen, ma è giusto spiegare da dove arrivano. Il nostro team è presente sul settore da giugno 2018 e, da allora: • ogni mese è stato chiuso in profitto • decine di migliaia di € di profitto complessivo generato • conti reali e verificabili, mai modificati Non parliamo di operazioni fortunate, ma di un lavoro costante basato su metodo, ge…
❤1
Buongiorno e buon week end a tutti! ✈️☀️
❤1
QA ATLAS 🤖💥💥💥💥💥 AGGIORNAMENTO DELLA SETTIMANA https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Luca_De_Andrea/qa-atlas-um-qa-018/11733930 ❌ Senza Esperienza e Competenza ❌ Senza tempo da dedicare ❌ NO grandi capitali ✅ 101% automatico E GRATUITO ✅ Aggiornamenti e assistenza gratuiti per sempre ✅ Storici certificati ✅ 8 anni di esperienza al tuo servizio SCRIVICI ORA ⬇️ @quantumaeternasupport @quantumaeternasupport @quantumaetern…
❤1
📘 Domani e domenica mercato chiuso Nel week end i mercati sono chiusi e non verranno aperte nuove operazioni. Questo fa parte del metodo: 📌 non si forza il mercato 📌 si rispettano tempi e condizioni 📌 si lavora solo quando ha senso farlo 👉 È però un ottimo momento per iniziare, organizzarsi e capire come funziona il servizio, così da farsi trovare pronti per la prossima settimana operativa. Il trading non è fare …
❤1
📊 Un dettaglio importante che molti sottovalutano Da oltre 5 anni sviluppiamo software automatici gratuiti e operiamo ogni settimana sugli stessi mercati che vedete qui. Non da ieri. Non da qualche mese. Dal 2020, senza interruzioni. 🔍 Tutto quello che facciamo è certificato e tracciabile: 👉 conti reali 👉 risultati pubblici 👉 storico verificabile su MyFxBook, visibile a chiunque Qui non chiediamo fiducia sulla par…
❤1
"Posso smettere quando voglio?" Sì! E senza chiedere il permesso a nessuno. ❌ Nessun abbonamento. ❌ Nessuna carta salvata. ❌ Nessun vincolo di durata. Il conto è TUO. I soldi restano sul tuo conto. Prelievi quando ti pare. 🏦 Quando vuoi smettere, non ci devi nessuna spiegazione. 🤑 SCRIVICI QUI PER CAPIRE COME INIZIARE! 🤑 @quantumaeternasupport @quantumaeternasupport @quantumaeternasupport
❤1
💬 Non siamo noi a dirlo. Sono loro. Ogni giorno riceviamo messaggi, feedback, recensioni di chi vive il percorso dall’interno. C’è chi è con noi da 3 anni. C’è chi ha iniziato da pochi mesi. C’è chi è partito con 500€ e oggi parla di risultati concreti. C’è chi ha attraversato momenti di drawdown… e ha capito cosa significa vera gestione. La cosa che accomuna tutti? 📌Serietà 📌 Presenza costante 📌 Supporto reale 📌…
⚡1
Volevamo ricordarvi che 📣 Siamo l’unica community in Italia a sviluppare internamente i software con oltre 475 membri attivi dal 2021 che utilizzano le soluzioni automatiche per combattere inflazione e rincari! 🤔 Gli unici con conti certificati attivi dal primo giorno di attività, pubblicamente visibili e mai modificati➡️🔗 QA ATLAS 🔒 Appena capirai che è possibile crearsi una piccola seconda entrata mensile ed entr…
❤1
Per quale motivo il tuo lavoro da dipendente è la tua unica fonde di reddito?
Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @quantumaeternaqa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Per quale motivo il tuo lavoro da dipendente è la tua unica fonde di reddito?
Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“QuantumAeterna (backup)” (@quantumaeternaqa), 4,431 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quantumaeternaqa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.