Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 13
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2024 to 20 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 5.00%
- 1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 36.0
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 45.0
- over 18 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2024 to 20 August 2024. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
20 Aug 2024, 15:48 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026 Advertisement
я тут с небольшой рекламкой ролевого тгк моего броо, прошу прочесть
данный тгк был создан по ау, где дилан является стримером, а данный канал же ведётся от его лица. я думаю, некоторым такое зайдет, так что подробности и остальное узнаете уже в инфо-посте!
так, краткое описание вы узнали, а теперь поговорим о владельце. мой бро хорошо ведёт каналы(говорю как тот, что работал с ним некоторое время) и отвечает за персо…
😴2
16 Aug 2024, 21:20 UTC40 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026 всем пррпрпрпр!! я живоии и пришло сообщить, что я создал щп канал, so буду в основном там теперь
а теперь всем пока я хочу спать и вам того же желаю 🦭
#щп
😴3
6 Aug 2024, 17:02 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026 вы уже видели новый дизайн лололошки? с=
#щп
😴2
28 Jul 2024, 19:03 UTC47 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026 что ж, наверное надо было сделать это раньше, да? извиняюсь, так нужно. постараюсь побыстрее восстановиться с=
(p.s.: вы можете мне предлогать идеи на будущее, это всё ещё актуально)
#щп
🔥3
Channel name was changed to «!! РЕСТ !! кофейня крикетс»
25 Jul 2024, 13:16 UTC46 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026 #БылНаФиналеПоследнейРеальности
#щп
❤1
24 Jul 2024, 21:28 UTC43 viewsread 29 August 2026 Photo
ну эм..всё, получается? или почти всё..
уфф, чувствую, тяжело будет(
#щп
23 Jul 2024, 13:00 UTC40 viewsread 29 August 2026 ром, я тебя безумно люблю, но не пугай так...пожалуйста..
#щп
21 Jul 2024, 09:32 UTC49 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026 в последнее время я чувствую, что не особо могу рисовать что-то для канала, так что возможно пока что тут будут редкие щп, простите
#щп
❤3
20 Jul 2024, 03:22 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026 последние серии хоть и наполнены сюжетом, но они такие эм..не знаю даже как объяснить. в серию будто пытаются впихнуть ВЕСЬ оставшийся сюжет и хоть как-то закрыть ненужные арки, чтобы к нужному числу всё было готово для финала. мне не особо нравится как это выглядит..помимо того, что выглядит это слегка нелепо,так и серии становится смотреть как-то некомфортно, что-ли. не успеваешь переработать информацию..
#щп
❤2
18 Jul 2024, 14:55 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026 Джон имеет обширную память но не имеет друзей. Лололошка не имеет памяти но имеет колоссальное количество друзей, которые им действительно дорожат (и которых он сам себе не создавал😂). Неужели, по словам подсознания Ло, Джон и есть то, к чему стремиться? Или наш мироходец так завидовал своему клону?...пока не узнал его получше.
Я думаю, что наш Лололошка — это лучшая версия из всех возможных в мультивселенных, по кра…
🍓3
18 Jul 2024, 14:52 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026 !! СПОЙЛЕРЫ!!
( сюжет )
мне нравится как у джона смешалась злость и обида, которая вырывалась, но он пытался даже так преподносить её в своей манере, следовать образу
#щп
🍓4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qriketsu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“!! РЕСТ !! 🚨🦭” (@qriketsu). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qriketsu.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.
