注册QQ发码 接码类目前还有一些库存 可以在自己频道通知一下 赚一些提成 转码链接已上架QQ接码 如果特别缺货可以尝试购买转码链接进行获取号码。
💩2

Channel
@qqqsim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,361subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002610228568 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @qqqlc @qqqsim |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qqqsim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 2,361 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 2,363 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 2,353 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 2,354 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 2,349 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 2,349 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25,364 |
| Reactions total | 188 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
188 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 47 | 25.0% | |
| 👎 | 26 | 13.8% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 11.7% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 11.2% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 7.98% | |
| 🤩 | 12 | 6.38% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 6.38% | |
| 🎉 | 10 | 5.32% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
注册QQ发码 接码类目前还有一些库存 可以在自己频道通知一下 赚一些提成 转码链接已上架QQ接码 如果特别缺货可以尝试购买转码链接进行获取号码。
💩2
QQ发码偶尔出现缺货可以下单转码链接或通道15纯电信卡,QQ接码类目也可以尝试下单 优先推荐通道10质量控制比较好,缺卡可选择通道15,18,19。由于是拦截卡问题也可能会拦截到错误验证码,如在意可下单QQ发码类成功率稳定。
💩9❤1
支付宝充值通道已恢复
🤬3❤1
通道10 注册QQ接码已补卡
🔥22👏19❤16👍15🤩12🥰12🎉10👎2
国际卡已补卡
👎4
注册QQ发码 接码类目前还有一些库存 可以在自己频道通知一下 赚一些提成
💩6
有没有做社交缓存号的 大量电信卡 出 有没有能做的
💩5👎1
QQ接码类目也可以尝试下单 优先推荐通道10质量控制比较好,缺卡可选择通道15,18,19。由于是拦截卡问题也可能会拦截到错误验证码,如在意可下单QQ发码类成功率稳定。QQ发码缺卡也可以下单通道15。
💩13👎1
目前抖音快手进行推广有很好的效果,会玩的老板可以尝试一下,推广链接赚取提成收入长期下来还是不错的,注册QQ发码 接码类目前还有一些库存 可以在自己频道通知一下 赚一些提成
💩10👎1
通知:最近盗号频繁,密码尽量不要设置太过简单,可以自行修改一下,如果忘记密码需要联系客服提供usdt地址可进行验证可找回。
通知:清理了一些无效用户长期没登陆余额低于0的用户。导致下级看起来变少了其实哪些都是无效用户,如果感觉误删了你的账号可联系客服恢复。
注册QQ发码 接码类目前还有一些库存 可以在自己频道通知一下 赚一些提成
💩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qqqsim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,004,782 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“三个q凉菜 一手拦截厅卡猫池卡国内国外接码注册QQ接码微信接码抖音接码快手接码陌陌接码小红书接码QQ链接处” (@qqqsim), 2,361 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qqqsim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.