Letsgooo Tekan Menekan ! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS9BSBU2ejwgR-DXHMq/
π₯27π4π₯°3π2

Channel
@qilonemovement7
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Polls Β· Cite this entry
48,228subscribers
+267 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315558599 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qilonemovement7 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qilonemovement7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 48,228 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 48,238 | +129 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 48,109 | +38 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 48,071 | -38 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 48,109 | +186 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 47,923 | -20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 47,943 | -79 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 48,022 | -68 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 48,090 | -29 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 48,119 | -53 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 48,172 | -41 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 48,213 | -34 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 48,247 | +10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 48,237 | -41 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 48,278 | +137 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 48,141 | +31 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 48,110 | +240 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 47,870 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 47,891 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 47,900 | first reading |
115 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 115 (5 August 2026 β 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 788,466 |
| Reactions total | 29,244 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
29,244 reactions across 115 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 23,087 | 78.9% | |
| β€ | 2,421 | 8.28% | |
| π³ | 695 | 2.38% | |
| π | 382 | 1.31% | |
| π | 360 | 1.23% | |
| π₯° | 290 | 0.992% | |
| π― | 207 | 0.708% | |
| π«‘ | 182 | 0.622% | |
| π | 168 | 0.574% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 160 | 0.547% | |
| π | 138 | 0.472% | |
| β‘ | 137 | 0.468% | |
| β | 130 | 0.445% | |
| π | 130 | 0.445% | |
| π€ | 114 | 0.39% | |
| π | 113 | 0.386% | |
| π | 109 | 0.373% | |
| π€ | 101 | 0.345% | |
| π | 94 | 0.321% | |
| π | 88 | 0.301% | |
| 2 further kinds | 138 | 0.472% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 29,244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Letsgooo Tekan Menekan ! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS9BSBU2ejwgR-DXHMq/
π₯27π4π₯°3π2
GUYS JOM LIVETRADE ! KASI DULU 333x π₯ TAP - TAP
π₯435β€17π€7β3π3π2π«‘2π―1
Nampak kan voting atas ni βοΈ Korang penuhkan dulu , minggu ni untuk buat keputusan hehe π
π84π₯39π«‘12β€5π3β€βπ₯2π2π2
30 ribu ringgit spend untuk lucky draw ? Berbaloi ke tak
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
π₯247β€19π16π6β‘4π3β2π2
Kalau 30 ribu ringgit spend untuk buat luckydraw ...
π₯153β€15β‘7π7π―4π₯°3π2π2
ππππ
π₯93π³11β€βπ₯3β€2π―2π₯°2π2π1
Tegak 100 pips ,, ada yang naik tapi bukan dalam seluar π !
π₯89β€21π6π₯°5π4π4π3π3
LETSGOOOO CARI SETUP !!! LIVE ENDED
π₯28π5β€βπ₯4π2β€1π1π€1π1
Sebelum kita livetrade , kasi Fulltap 333x π₯ letsgooo !!
π₯432π€10β€8β5π³5π«‘4π3π3
Gila-gila sedar tak sedar Lagi 6 hari candle monthly nak closed π Rancak kan movement gold bulan ni ?
π₯261β€11π₯°8π3π€3π2π1π1
All setup win harini !! Semua nak lagi ke ? π
π₯136β€12π3π€3β2π2π―2π«‘2
Gold buy 1 : 300 pips β β β Gold buy 2 : 120 pips β β β Aggresif malam ni sebab nak bagi manis-2 !!
π₯66β€5π4π3π€3π3π3β2
Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @qilonemovement7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@qilonemovement7 edited 5 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
30 ribu ringgit spend untuk lucky draw ? Berbaloi ke tak
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βQil OneMovement π΅πΈβ (@qilonemovement7), 48,228 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qilonemovement7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.