Channel
@qh0688
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,344subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001724952329 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qh0688 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qh0688 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 07:54 | 1,344 | -3 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 1,347 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 1,351 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 1,356 | +4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 1,352 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 1,353 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 1,351 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 1,353 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 1,355 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 1,357 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 1,354 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 1,359 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 1,359 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#台中客評 👠高跟鞋一踩 殺傷力直接破表 🦵那雙白長美腿 光是看就值回價 💋顏值頂 身材辣 口技更是天花板 🍌深喉一含 喊你哥哥 直接投降 高顏值美腿辣妹 約過就回不去🔥 【妹妹昵稱】：安柏 【年 齡】：22歲 【身 高】：165左右 【罩 杯】：C 【身 材】：很好 美腿細腰😍 【服務過程】： 一開門就愣住了，妹妹穿半透明裙裝，若隱若現的曲線完全長在我的審美上，當下懸著的心就放下了。門還沒關好，妹妹就給了我一個大大的擁抱，瞬間好感度拉滿。 交了課費之後一起進浴室，全程都是妹妹主動幫我洗，水裡那套該有的服務一樣沒少，光是在浴缸裡就快把持不住。 轉戰床上先B面後A面，吸皮、毒龍、漫遊全套走一遍，真的是我遇過口技最頂的，舒服到讓我忍不住記住她。 吻了一下妹妹的敏感點，她立刻癢得扭腰，我也早就硬到極限。戴好套傳教士位開場，我還來不及動作，妹妹已經自己扭起來了，沒幾下就喊「快點、用力」，我才…
👍1
秋天第一炮 約起來🔥 別讓這個秋天 涼透你的老二 該硬的時候就要硬 該約的時候就別忍
❤1
大乳茶已備好🥰
秋日第一杯奶茶優質正妹 芯瑜 160 45 B 19歲（價位：13000） #幼齒學生型 剛滿19歲，還在讀夜校， 長相稚嫩青澀，沒什麼經驗但很聽話配合 😇 梓涵 164 48 C 23歲（價位：8000） #反差萌型 外表文靜可愛，戴著眼鏡像乖乖牌， 一脫衣服馬上變另一個人，主動到你受不了🔥 雨瞳 158 43 A 21歲（價位：11000） #日系蘿莉型 短髮小隻馬，長得像日本AV女優， 聲音軟萌，穿上水手服讓你秒硬😏 佳穎 167 51 D 26歲（價位：7500） #美腿大奶型 腿很長很直，胸部有料， 適合喜歡腿部線條跟豐滿兼具的 惠茹 162 55 D 30歲（價位：5000） #親切姐姐型 身材肉肉的很有安全感， 服務很溫柔像在談戀愛，適合想要被疼的感覺 思婷 155 41 A 20歲（價位：12000） #極輕小隻馬 不到42公斤，整個人小小的很好抱， 長相清秀，學生感很重 雅琳 169 5…
Sticker, posted without a caption
快來打響立秋第一炮呀 哥哥們
Photo, posted without a caption
😀 北部 （台北、新北） 比比 155cm Ccup 22歲 43kg 蘿莉學生 7000 溫蒂 163cm Dcup 26歲 46kg 專櫃小姐 5000 丹丹 162cm Ecup 25歲 48kg 奶水媽媽 6000 小乖 161cm Ccup 23歲 47kg 幼教老師 5000 安娜 166cm Dcup 21歲 45kg 混血學生 8000 😀中部（台中、彰化） 麗婭 163cm Dcup 26歲 49kg 無套人妻 3000 小依 160cm Ccup 23歲 46kg 可愛店員 4000 米娜 163cm Ecup 25歲 49kg 大奶櫃姐 3500 樂樂 162cm Ccup 22歲 46kg 初兼學生 6000 凡凡 158cm Dcup 26歲 47kg 國中老師 3500 菲子 165cm Ccup 25歲 46kg 櫃檯專姐 4000…
#高雄可約 #台南可約 莎莎 164.44.C.23歲 貪心小惡魔 可愛中帶着些許的嫵媚 身材骨感 性格主動 腰超級會搖的尺度很大 氣質很不錯 悶騷的個性 讓你在床上享受別樣的激情 📱清清のTG🆔： @qh689 📱清清のLINE🆔：bj886 ⭐清清のGleezy🆔：tw9453 https://gleezy.net/tw9453
#新竹可約 依蓓 158cm C奶 44kg 21歲 可可愛愛 惹人憐愛的俏麗小妞 童顏外貌讓人有犯罪的感覺 像是怪叔叔跟小蘿莉的情節般 覺得刺激又性奮! 📱清清のTG🆔： @qh689 📱清清のLINE🆔：bj886 ⭐清清のGleezy🆔：tw9453 https://gleezy.net/tw9453
#雙北可約 若軒：165.C.47.25歲 氣質出眾的美女 身材高挑 臉蛋精緻 性格溫柔體貼 很有氣質 相處起來像春風般溫暖 帶給你滿滿女友感 📱清清のTG🆔： @qh689 📱清清のLINE🆔：bj886 ⭐清清のGleezy🆔：tw9453 https://gleezy.net/tw9453
#台中可約 吐司163.46.C.21歲 清純模樣 很想讓人幹她 身材骨感清秀 無毛是白虎喔 私密處很嫩 敏感誰多 可親水溝先潮吹 可品鮑 69 輕巧好抱 溫柔乖乖聽話 配合你任意姿勢 📱清清のTG🆔： @qh689 📱清清のLINE🆔：bj886 ⭐清清のGleezy🆔：tw9453 https://gleezy.net/tw9453
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @qh0688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“台灣清清外送茶坊賴🆔018868全台外送茶/外約優質服務/台妹外約/外約/外送茶/魚訊/住家叫小姐/約炮/喝茶/約妹/茶訊/定點/找妹/個工/一夜情/全套半套上門服務/舒壓按摩spa/包夜/外圍女/精選妹妹每日更新” (@qh0688), 1,344 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qh0688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.