Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Yetixx

Channel

Yetixx

@pyall

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,433subscribers

-249 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001990522293
TypeChannel
Username@pyall
Created26 March 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/pyall

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,4335,6905,561.58 August 2026 — 5,682 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,678 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,673 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,690 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,676 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,665 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,640 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,612 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,597 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,587 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,565 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,545 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,520 subscribers28 September 2026 — 5,493 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,460 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,433 subscribers8 August 202612 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 65 days, net -249. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,394–5,729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 04:575,433-27
5 Oct 2026, 13:185,460-33
28 Sept 2026, 01:365,493-27
15 Sept 2026, 23:215,520-25
12 Sept 2026, 03:395,545-20
7 Sept 2026, 14:405,565-22
2 Sept 2026, 23:535,587-10
30 Aug 2026, 17:455,597-15
27 Aug 2026, 20:565,612-28
24 Aug 2026, 21:375,640-25
21 Aug 2026, 06:085,665-11
17 Aug 2026, 23:225,676-14
14 Aug 2026, 16:065,690+17
10 Aug 2026, 23:045,673-5
8 Aug 2026, 06:245,678-4
8 Aug 2026, 01:315,682first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 March 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2643.3%
😁1118.3%
🤯58.33%
🆒46.67%
🐳35.00%
😍35.00%
🤩35.00%
❤‍🔥23.33%
🥰23.33%
💯11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2024 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pyall. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 March 2024 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC102 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Should I launch a VIP service providing CVEs and tools?

  1. Yes60%
  2. No40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC162 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://eurobusia.be/wp-includes/1.txt https://palette-europe.net/wp-admin/maint/1.txt https://weddingmarquees.com.au/wp-admin/css/1.txt https://tourisme.gov.gn/1.txt

5 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC223 viewsread 12 August 2026

Selling tools for finding shells and new CVEs, and teaching web hacking techniques @Yetixxa - @Yetixx1 💠

30 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC406 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

WordPress Expl0!T 😉 Use This on WordPress Site List 100% Fresh and Writable Sites. I am using This personally from a long time still getting good results

🆒2🐳1😁1

28 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC504 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

python EverestForms.py list.txt WordPress RCE over 100k+ vuln sites

❤4😁2🆒1

27 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC515 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✍️🤔Wordpress/Webshell avaiable for sell🤔✍️ + Random category + High DA/PA/AS/Traffic + 24 hour save Need Webshell -> @Yetixxa - @Yetixx1✅

❤2💯1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pyall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Should I launch a VIP service providing CVEs and tools?

  1. Yes60%
  2. No40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2024 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Yetixx” (@pyall), 5,433 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pyall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.