Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Почему бы не Париж

Channel

Почему бы не Париж

@purkvapa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,058subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001485258032
TypeChannel
Username@purkvapa
Created10 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/purkvapa

Growth

1,0581,0631,060.56 August 2026 — 1,063 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,063 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,062 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,061 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,058 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,057–1,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:471,058-3
12 Aug 2026, 02:481,061-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:111,062-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:481,063no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:291,063first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 12 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5042.7%
🔥4336.8%
2420.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2023 to 13 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Apr 2026, 13:46 UTC443 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Это не совсем реклама, это анонс события, которое проведу я сам. В это воскресенье, вместе с Memoria Artis, мы организовываем фотопрогулку по Парижу и мастер-класс по стрит-фотографии. Я занимаюсь фотографией уже много лет, на плёнку и на цифру, и Париж за больше чем 10 лет я, кажется, исходил вдоль и поперёк. Посмотрите мои фотографии вот тут: @tim.fable Гулять будем четыре часа, по Парижу, идеальному городу для

6🔥3👍2

9 Oct 2024, 14:42 UTC≈1,940 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Тут ребята, увидев мой пост, прислали мне еще деталей про спектакль: 👑 «КОРОЛЬ ЛИР И ЕГО ПОВАР» - продолжение пьесы Шекспира. Актёры Алексей Дедоборщ и Егор Морозов покажут историю о короле Лире, после смерти оказавшимся в чистилище в компании с незнакомцем. Актёры ставят перед зрителем неудобные вопросы: рефлексирует ли Тиран? О чём мечтает и о чём может сожалеть? Создаёт ли сам Народ себе Правителя? Кто же этот По

1👍1🔥1

9 Oct 2024, 14:15 UTC≈1,620 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Привет, народ! Да, я знаю, я совсем забросил канал. И вообще пропал. Я никуда не делся из Парижа, просто последнее время полностью погрузился в стрит фотографию и мой аккаунт в инсте (http://instagram.com/tim.fable/), и свободного времени не хватает ни на что другое. Но тут мне написали ребята из маленького независимого театра The Chaika и я не смог пройти мимо! Ребята попросили рассказать вам о премьере их спектакл

👍13

13 Oct 2023, 11:55 UTC≈2,920 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Париж замечателен тем, что там постоянно какая-то движуха на улицах. Музыканты, шествия, выставки. Обычно я просто иду куда ноги ведут. Но иногда посматриваю, что там в парках и на площадях намечается. Например, на этой неделе (с кульминацией в выходные) на Монмартре проходит 90ый (!) FÊTE DES VENDANGES. Там много всего похоже интересного будет. Вкусный паркур вокруг Sacré Coeur - можно на месте будет подегустирова

👍172🔥1

13 Oct 2023, 08:27 UTC≈2,290 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А вот немного моих фоток из прогулки в прошлые выходные.

🔥318👍4

12 Oct 2023, 18:17 UTC≈2,040 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Даже сложно представить сколько лет этим фотографиям.

👍13🔥76

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @purkvapa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,471,302 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Почему бы не Париж” (@purkvapa), 1,058 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/purkvapa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.