Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pure Разведчица

Channel

Pure Разведчица

@puresecrett

Has discussion group2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,338subscribers

+130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194760964
TypeChannel
Usernames@puresecret @puresecrett
Created4 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/puresecrett

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,3554,1786 August 2026 — 8,208 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,208 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,204 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,202 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,192 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,176 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,160 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,137 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,173 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,189 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,200 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,197 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6 subscribers1 October 2026 — 12 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,355 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,355 subscribers8 October 2026 — 8,338 subscribers8,3386 August 20268 October 2026
18 measurements spanning 63 days, net +130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 13:018,338-17
5 Oct 2026, 00:228,355no change
4 Oct 2026, 23:478,355+8,343
1 Oct 2026, 20:5512+6
17 Sept 2026, 17:006+5
10 Sept 2026, 12:011-8,196
5 Sept 2026, 02:598,197-3
1 Sept 2026, 07:188,200+11
29 Aug 2026, 09:188,189+16
26 Aug 2026, 00:538,173+36
23 Aug 2026, 06:588,137-23
19 Aug 2026, 08:228,160-16
16 Aug 2026, 08:068,176-16
12 Aug 2026, 21:568,192-10
10 Aug 2026, 01:048,202-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:158,204-4
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,208no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:578,208first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

564 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15928.2%
❤15327.1%
😁14525.7%
⚡5910.5%
👏295.14%
🤔162.84%
💔30.532%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 564 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @puresecrett. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC882 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ужин без белья во Флориде: как работает самый скандальный стейкхаус Голливуде В стейкхаус C.L.A.S.S. Soiree начал проводить ежемесячные ужины, где гости едят полностью обнаженными. Концепцию придумал владелец и шеф-повар заведения Мурад Али. Чтобы посетителям было психологически комфортнее переступить порог, на входе их встречает обнаженная хостес. При этом весь остальной персонал, как официанты и повара, остаются …

❤17😁9👏4🤔3

23 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC703 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡💟💟💟💟🤪 Эта папка — для тех, кто ищет большего 🔥 Откровенные блоги: 😘о сексе, 🥰 свинге, 👀 МЖМ и свободных отношениях. От начинающих исследователей до опытных практиков. Открой для себя новые грани — ныряй целиком или выбирай по вкусу! 🔝 https://t.me/addlist/mwdrzZalX75jNzdi Проверьте архив после подписки! ✅Уже есть две папки и не даёт подписаться на третью? ⏺ Не видишь каналы в ленте? ⚡️ Инструкция, что дела…

👏3🔥3⚡2❤2

22 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC773 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

За один год Лаванда Браун, рыжеволосая актриса из Гарри Поттера, заработала на OnlyFans больше, чем за всю свою карьеру в кино. На платформе актриса просто расчёсывает волосы, делает разные причёски по запросам подписчиков и надевает разные костюмы. За это она получает до 1,6 млн рублей в день. Есть над чем подумать перед сном

❤13⚡9😁6

17 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,140 views26 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Покупаем билеты?

😁18🤔5❤2👏1

10 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,490 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

August Theory Август наступил, а значит, в воздухе витает не только пыльца, но и сообщения от бывших. Говорят, именно в последний месяц лета люди массово ностальгируют по курортным романам и пишут тем, кого уже забыли, ну или делали вид, что забыли. Психологи объясняют: солнце садится раньше, дофамин падает, а мозг ищет старые якоря. Ну и осень на носу многим хочется определённости, а не просто «посмотрим». Что …

🔥15👏4❤3😁3

7 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,230 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Вредные непрошенные советы 1. Открывайте прибыльный бизнес. Не прибыльный не открывайте. 2. Нанимайте эффективных сотрудников, других не нанимайте. 3. Ставьте план по прибыли, например, 12 млн за год. Значит вам надо зарабатывать 1 млн в месяц. 4. Если не хватает клиентов, найдите их и их будет больше. 5. Делайте все правильно и не ошибайтесь. 6. Чтобы увеличить чек, повысьте цены на 50%, а расходы снизьте. Больше …

😁24👏7🔥4❤1

4 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,280 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня День рождения шампанского. Хороший день ❤️ Вот что стоит знать об этом «пузырчатом» празднике: легенда гласит, что именно 4 августа 1668 года монах-бенедиктинец Пьер Периньон в аббатстве Отвильер (провинция Шампань) впервые угостил братьев напитком с пузырьками. Попробовав его, он якобы воскликнул: «На вкус, как звезды!» Пользуясь случаем рекомендую нишевый канал только про игристое- Prosecco Night Stand 🍾

❤16🔥5⚡4

30 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,540 views26 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Полный гид по интиму в небе Все мы слышали про загадочный и элитный «Клуб 5 миль». Многие мечтали в него вступить. Но мало кто задумывался, что вместо клубной карты вы можете получить наручники, штраф в 15 000$ и билет в камеру. Разбираем, почему небо не лучшее место для страсти. ✈️ Лазейка в законе, которой нет Юристы (в том числе из Авиасейлс) подтверждают: отдельной статьи «Секс в самолете» в уголовных кодекса…

❤18⚡6🔥2

19 Jul 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,910 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026

¡Bien hecho! ¡Fue un gran partido, España! ¡Campeones! ❤️❤️❤️

🔥12👏5💔3😁3

17 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC≈2,230 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Авито планирует запустить свой сервис для знакомств. М-да, фраза «я нашла его на авито» заиграет новыми красками

😁31❤6👏1

16 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC≈2,040 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Уф, какая Кара Делевинь на обложке Playboy! В интервью модель открыто рассказала, как изменилось ее отношение к интимной близости после того, как она отказалась от алкоголя и запрещенки. «Секс в трезвом состоянии после всего, через что я прошла, оказался непростым опытом. Но теперь он стал гораздо глубже и эмоциональнее». Похоже, Кара пересобрала себя снова. И ещё анонсировали в августе выход дюбютного альбома

🔥24❤12⚡5

14 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC≈1,880 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Безумная архитектура японских отелей любви Представьте: едете по японской трассе и видите... розовый замок с башнями. Или альпийское шале посреди рисовых полей. Или круизный лайнер, застрявший на обочине. Это не галлюцинация - это love hotel. Франсуа Прост три года колесил по Японии от Токио до Сикоку, фотографируя эти удивительные здания. В 2023 году вышел его проект «Love Hotel» - смотри в комментариях Архитекту…

🔥24❤12⚡6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @puresecrett. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

В поиске того самого
@lvira_lina_up · 19,007
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pure Разведчица” (@puresecrett), 8,338 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/puresecrett.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.