Кста, чуть не забыл, я создал свой ТТ акк в которую буду постить всякую хуйню, вот ссылка на новое видео про величайших вирусописателей https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4HPLPsE/
❤4
Signed Vincent Lalo
Channel
@publicarchiveR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,985subscribers
-35 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002161522565 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @publicarchiveR |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/publicarchiveR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 1,985 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 1,992 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 2,002 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 2,008 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 2,020 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 2,020 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 621 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
51 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 27.5% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 23.5% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 11.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 9.80% | |
| 🎃 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кста, чуть не забыл, я создал свой ТТ акк в которую буду постить всякую хуйню, вот ссылка на новое видео про величайших вирусописателей https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4HPLPsE/
❤4
Signed Vincent Lalo
Интересный факт, Онель Де Гузман единственный вирусописатель который шотнул бюджет Америки и при этом скрылся когда у ФБР были фулл данные Гузмана, интересно жив ли он, увы этого не узнаем, хотя хорошее интервью получилось бы
❤2👍1
Signed Vincent Lalo
*новая волна скетчвейр слопа
Signed крипипаста
В любом случае если станет популярной будет новая волна людей в коммьюнити, причем гораздо лучше чем раньше
Signed Vincent Lalo
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4mfY2cv/ Есть ли шанс что Олд эра фриков-хакеров станет популярной? Сомневаюсь, но шансы есть
Signed Vincent Lalo
Завтра будет разбор, а сегодня спать
👍4❤1
Signed Vincent Lalo
Ну и ещё копию курса eJPT v2 находил которая стоит 300 баксов, прокачивает много чего но слабее чем курсы OffSec
🥰4❤1🤩1
Signed Vincent Lalo
Я нихуя не нашел, зато нашел курсы по OffSec(два курса каждый из которых стоит 1700 долларов) к сожалению не в открытом доступе, но зато нашел, мб когда нибудь воспользуюсь когда захочу прокачаться в пентестинге(а точнее развить инфраструктурный пентестинг) либо если захочу прокачать анализ кода для создания эксплойтов и прочей хуйни, если хотите получить копию курса то связывайтесь со мной в ЛС ибо в канал я сливать…
🎃4
Signed Vincent Lalo
Ну а если честно, жалко чела, администрация хакснации лицемеры ебанные
Signed Vincent Lalo
Действительно блять, как же тебя так быстро забанили это же нивозможна🤟🤟😂😂😂
Signed Vincent Lalo
Я кстати думал над очень интересной вещью, а почему бы не поискать платные курсы программирования TCM? Я видел просто кучу обсуждений где людям нужны эти курсы и думая над всей этой ситуацией я думаю было бы выгодно найти эти курсы(только публикация этих курсов в моем канале приведет к моментальному бану)так что можно было бы просто распространять информацию насчёт этого в интернете и люди сами бы приходили, хорошая …
🔥2
Signed Vincent Lalo
Но сам гайд я давать вам не буду, я не настолько сильно потерял надежду чтобы кидать в свой канал гайды мошенничества, хотя с моего анализа можно будет сделать гайд гораздо похлеще...
Signed Vincent Lalo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @publicarchiveR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 499,263 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Архивы Интернета” (@publicarchiveR), 1,985 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/publicarchiveR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.