6 measurements spanning 20 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,644–2,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 02:02
2,645
-6
21 Aug 2026, 09:28
2,651
+1
18 Aug 2026, 02:32
2,650
-4
14 Aug 2026, 20:26
2,654
+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:15
2,652
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:08
2,652
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 2,645 subscribers
Avg views / post
464
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
18 (16 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
464
Reactions total
27
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 40s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,193 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
761
63.8%
🔥
311
26.1%
👌
34
2.85%
🥰
30
2.51%
❤🔥
13
1.09%
👍
13
1.09%
🤩
8
0.671%
😍
7
0.587%
🐳
6
0.503%
👏
5
0.419%
🙏
4
0.335%
🎉
1
0.084%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как правильно chanterelle или girolle
Правильно лисички 😆
Итак, птички мои
К сожалению не все сюда выкладываю
Но все же не забываю
Сама того не зная я жарила girolle а не chanterelle
Разница в том, что chanterelle это лисички в принципе, как вид грибов
A girolle это уже подвид
Хотя копнув глубже оказалось
Что разница еще проще
Girolle это бытовое название, как правило используется на юге , как правило для более …
Тематический ужин в Санкт Петербурге
7-8 августа
Итак, птички мои
Считаю мы с @marinaartgladkaya уже легенды ))
Вы слышите ее повсюду, особенно если вы используете петербургское метро, ходите в Эрмитаж и Третьяковку, если смотрели «секс в большом город», «битва престолов» и еще множество культовых картин, в которых герои говорят голосом Марины
Мы решили сделать ужин , посвященный любви к Франции через призму жизни…
Итак про розе
Как только мы столкнулись с розовыми винами мы сразу поняли какие любить
На самом деле все зависит от обстоятельств
Но прованские розе самые понятные и питкие без утяжеляющих факторов других громких регионов
Им не стыдно делать просто , в этом и есть суть их популярности и востребованности .
Поэтому все любят именно прованское розе
Кстати , лучшим регионом для розе в Провансе считается местечко Band…
«Дорогая подруга!
Для написания слов человеку в не свободных отношениях ты должна определиться в целях
И если твои цели и их последствия оправданы
И имеют смысл
То подумай еще раз
Потому что даже сметану в магазине ты никогда не берешь ту что лежит на полке перед тобой , ты возьмешь ту что сложнее достать думая что у нее другой срок годности
Но даже это уже предугадано мерчендайзерами
И они ставят на второй ряд…
Первый рецепт с лазурки
Как пить в жару
Берем розовое , оттенка gris (расскажу вам скоро)
Много льда
Обязательно Perrier
И много базилика
Так вы можете пить много, быть слегка на весле и при этом не терять вкус
На самом деле отличный лайф хак в жару
Бон суар, как говорится
Всем привет
Я уже на лазурке
Париж гляньте в инста
Все равно пока для всего нужен впн
Итак
Я уже на лазурке
В маленьком городке Gigaro, чуть восточнее сан тропе
Первое утро
Соседний Spar
И скоро распаковка
Как я видела мир в момент первой сигареты в Париже ……
❤53🥰10👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ptichkimoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ptichkimoi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@marinaartgladkaya named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Итак, птички мои” (@ptichkimoi), 2,645 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptichkimoi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.