Channel
@ptgffake
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,530subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001151158492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ptgffake |
| Created | Between 1 October 2018 and 3 June 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ptgffake |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 1,530 | -1 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 04:16 | 1,531 | -8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 1,539 | +3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 1,536 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 1,539 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 1,540 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 1,541 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 1,541 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 June 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🚨收到情報詐騙集團因被打擊窮途末路，製作大量假試圖甚至網站抺黑PTGFHK，請各位切勿相信。🔊 💁🏻♀再次提醒「公海」因無需驗證有大量agent及騙徒，最主要包含是任的男扮女詐騙集團，主要手法透過「買相後才約會」手法是騙取金錢後馬上消失。已多次封號，但仍不停有新號加入人難以即時察覺，建議使用lv2 @ptgfda 需驗證群組減少被騙機會。 如發現與PTGFHK假谷「真女真香港」成員出現本谷請盡早舉報並將黑名單踢出所有谷⚠
🔊突發！！大量姊妹指控詐騙集團主腦👿 👩🏻🎓一有事就用黑社會恐嚇女仔，未聽清楚雙方供詞，師兄話伏任就即時會講我有條女張相威脅公開女方。 👩🏻🎓佢地有所謂女神呃年齡34，35扮28。生埋仔收高價，男一負評就踢。因為啲「女神」好得閒日傾夜傾吹水幫佢留住堆客。 👩🏻🎓總之都係靠出賣女人賺錢即使個女仔有十個好評，一個負評，都俾佢地伏女名單寫死。迫人入佢地v集團，用驗證留相俾佢地操控。 👩🏻🎓明明好多所謂伏女都2x頭，真女。起碼後生過啲所謂3x歲女神。 👩🏻🎓佢地成日屈女，放哂女仔相出黎。錯左只係話我捐番錢俾馬會，但個女仔就已經受好大影響。而且佢地黑，只可以屈服接受。先前有幾個女仔受影響，雖然del左po, 但啲師兄已經睇左全相。 👩🏻🎓迫人露樣驗證，明明佢地主動pm啲女仔叫佢地加入vip驗證。不過張驗證相會放上群組公開限時，咁多人其中一個 cap圖偷拍都死。 💁🏻♀受害人請可向 @PTGFadmin 提供線報
🚨繼假PTGFHK真女谷後，收到線報任我行詐騙集團偷取VIP谷姊妹照片開設詐騙網站，並且賊喊捉賊指我們經營此網站，經向各姊妹查詢後並沒有同意被使用。此詐騙集團早有前科(可向上找回記錄)，透過男扮女多在本谷不停開新號賣相才能約會等手段詐騙多時，經常也收男士到被此集團騙取金錢投訴，因此再次提醒大家勿輕易信。有任何此詐騙主腦消息，歡迎向我提供。謝謝
《PTGF約女指南》 謝絕 #agent 相信有唔少師兄啱啱出黎約，一定會約到agent女，咁我將會講吓咩係agent，點識穿agent女，方便大家唔會中伏 咩係agent? 咁係agent顧名思義姐係接觸你果個人，佢係同你聯絡後，再派女黎酒店服務你，我哋係想約ptgf ，而唔係日日都開工既🐥 點識穿agent 1.Icon 首先我地黎睇吓agent既icon ，一般分為兩種，第一種就係有女拎住紙仔驗證，通常一般身材突出，相信agent旗下有咁多女，影呢啲相一定唔難，出到黎一定會係呢個身形。 第二種係拎ig上比較多follow嘅女士相，好簡單！只要用Google搜尋就可以搵到相片嘅來源，假設IG上面比較多follow嘅女士真係出嚟做PTGF，段估都唔會咁蠢用自己相掛，例如香港大學孫志新果位女神 2.錄音 呢一方面都無謂多解釋，agent旗下有咁多女，求其搵條女錄音一定唔難，反而真女唔會錄音，就算錄音之後都一定…
入數黨詐騙集團主腦任我行已獲利7位數字
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
入數黨詐騙集團主腦任我行已獲利7位數字
最新列入黑名單 @ansonforu @sexylonely817817 @catcat1997 @steve261 @bryantbbs @leol2021 @littermonster @cts0201tyo @kenken1979 @hardworkbear @jason101hk
騙徒集團名單 @fiona1314520 @gigi_ptgf @Candy_bbg @stellababyoo @okamanbabyo @rorosese @cathybb00 @hebe_ptgf @candy806 @sukibaby516 @shitheartbaby @Dsefighter @June912 @ching1000
詐騙集團出沒注意‼️本谷早前收到舉報騙徒任我行「真女真香港」群組由於臭名遠播，重新改頭換面開新群組名為「蒙着嘴說愛你」繼續透過假女分身詐騙！請保持警惕，切勿輕易相信！ ⚠️由於難以分辨是否分身或同黨，所有加入該谷成員都會被黑名單。
@ptgfsuetyi @yokobaby00 @Athena_ptgf @kiki_0369 騙子名：小雪兒💕，糖糖💫，Athena，Kiki✨⚡️ 四個號同一個人 全部偷相扮自己
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ptgffake. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ptgffake named 23 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📝騙徒名單😰呃錢騙案👩🏻🎓” (@ptgffake), 1,530 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptgffake.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.