Channel
@ptdgredm41
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,509subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001403602455 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ptdgredm41 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ptdgredm41 |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 4,509 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 4,512 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 4,519 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 4,520 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 4,528 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 4,532 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 4,535 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 4,535 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (10 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,443 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hari kedua persediaan temuduga SPA, kita bincang satu perkara yang nampak kecil tetapi sebenarnya boleh beri kesan besar, iaitu pakaian. Ya, pakaian. Kadang calon sudah hafal jawapan cantik, tetapi penampilan pula nampak macam nak pergi beli roti canai pagi Ahad. Panel belum tanya soalan, tetapi first impression sudah mula terbentuk. Dalam temuduga kerajaan, pakaian menunjukkan kematangan, kesungguhan, disiplin, h…
PEGAWAI BOMBA GRED KB1 2026: 500 Kekosongan Dibuka di Semenanjung, Sabah & Sarawak 👉 https://www.ptdexam.com/pegawai-bomba-gred-kb1-2026/
Kalau anda ada temuduga SPA dalam masa terdekat, hari pertama persediaan jangan terus hafal skrip jawapan semata-mata. Mula dahulu dengan faham 3 perkara asas: 1. Jawatan yang anda pohon 2. Skop tugas jawatan tersebut 3. Kementerian atau jabatan yang terlibat Ramai calon gagal bukan sebab mereka tidak pandai bercakap. Tapi sebab bila panel tanya soalan asas, mereka mula tergagap-gagap. Contohnya panel tanya: “Cu…
[HARI KE-9] TIPS UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK 2026: BEZA SETUJU DAN SANGAT SETUJU Pilih Setuju apabila pernyataan itu umumnya menggambarkan diri anda, tetapi masih terdapat keadaan tertentu yang menjadi pengecualian. Pilih Sangat Setuju apabila pernyataan tersebut sangat kuat menggambarkan prinsip dan kebiasaan diri anda. Jangan pilih Sangat Setuju untuk semua pernyataan positif. Profil anda nanti boleh kelihatan terlalu sem…
[HARI KE-8] TIPS UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK 2026: TERAS KEPIMPINAN Contoh soalan: “Saya bersedia mengambil tanggungjawab apabila keputusan pasukan tidak mencapai hasil yang diharapkan.” Cadangan kecenderungan: Setuju atau Sangat Setuju. Kepimpinan bukan sekadar memberi arahan. Ia juga melibatkan keberanian mengambil tanggungjawab, mengakui kelemahan dan membantu memperbaiki keadaan. Namun, jangan keliru antara kepimpinan…
📢 UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK JURURAWAT GRED U5 Pesakit mungkin sedang sakit, takut atau keliru. Dalam keadaan tersebut, seorang jururawat perlu kekal tenang, sabar dan mampu memberikan layanan yang baik. Sebab itulah ujian psikometrik bukan sekadar melihat cara calon menjawab soalan, tetapi turut menilai sama ada personaliti calon sesuai dengan tanggungjawab seorang jururawat. 🏥 Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia 📅 Tarikh ujia…
[HARI KE-7] TIPS UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK 2026: TERAS KERJASAMA PASUKAN| Contoh soalan: “Saya lebih suka melakukan semua tugasan sendiri kerana sukar mempercayai orang lain.” Cadangan kecenderungan: Tidak Setuju. Rajin bekerja sendiri ialah perkara yang baik. Namun, sukar mempercayai orang lain dan enggan bekerjasama boleh menjadi masalah dalam organisasi. Dalam dunia kerja, calon perlu mampu berkongsi maklumat, membah…
[HARI KE-6] TIPS UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK 2026: TERAS KAWALAN EMOSI Contoh soalan: “Saya akan membalas teguran dengan segera jika saya merasakan teguran itu tidak adil.” Cadangan kecenderungan: Tidak Setuju. Tidak Setuju bukan bermaksud anda membiarkan diri diperlakukan sesuka hati. Ia menunjukkan anda tidak bertindak terburu-buru. Tindakan yang lebih matang ialah bertenang, memahami teguran dan meminta penjelasan secar…
[HARI KE-5] TIPS UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK 2026: TERAS INTEGRITI Contoh soalan: “Saya sanggup menutup kesalahan kecil rakan sekerja demi menjaga hubungan baik.” Cadangan kecenderungan jawapan ialah Tidak Setuju atau Sangat Tidak Setuju. Menjaga hubungan baik memang penting, tetapi menutup kesalahan bukan cara yang betul. Calon yang berintegriti sepatutnya menegur dengan berhemah, menggunakan saluran yang betul dan tidak …
[HARI KE-4] TIPS UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK 2026: TIGA DOMAIN UTAMA PSIKOMETRIK Walaupun soalan psikometrik kelihatan pelbagai, kebanyakannya boleh dikaitkan dengan tiga domain utama: ✅ Sikap dan personaliti ✅ Emosi dan daya tahan ✅ Nilai dan integriti Soalan tentang kerjasama, keyakinan dan disiplin boleh berkaitan dengan sikap. Soalan tentang tekanan dan kemarahan pula boleh menilai emosi. Soalan tentang wang, amanah dan…
[HARI KETIGA] TIPS UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK 2026: TIADA JAWAPAN BETUL ATAU SALAH? Ramai berkata ujian psikometrik tiada jawapan betul atau salah. Kenyataan itu ada betulnya, tetapi tidak bermaksud calon boleh menekan jawapan secara rawak. Sesuatu jawatan tetap memerlukan nilai tertentu seperti amanah, tanggungjawab, kestabilan emosi dan kerjasama. Jawapan yang terlalu bercanggah dengan nilai ini boleh memberikan gambaran …
[HARI KEDUA] TIPS UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK 2026: APA TUJUAN UJIAN PSIKOMETRIK? Mengapa calon perlu menduduki ujian psikometrik walaupun sudah mempunyai kelayakan akademik? Kelayakan akademik menunjukkan pengetahuan seseorang, tetapi belum tentu menggambarkan cara calon mengawal emosi, bekerjasama, mematuhi arahan atau membuat keputusan. Ujian psikometrik membantu menilai kesesuaian calon dengan jawatan, gaya bekerja, tah…
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ptdgredm41. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 47,656 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pegawai Tadbir Dan Diplomatik M9” (@ptdgredm41), 4,509 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptdgredm41.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.