Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психотерапевтические заметки

Channel

Психотерапевтические заметки

@psychotherapist_notes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,343subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001592083128
TypeChannel
Username@psychotherapist_notes
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psychotherapist_notes

Growth

1,3431,3441,343.510 August 2026 — 1,343 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,343 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,344 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,343 subscribers10 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,343–1,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:481,343-1
13 Aug 2026, 06:571,344+1
10 Aug 2026, 02:281,343no change
10 Aug 2026, 00:471,343first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 1,343 subscribers
Avg views / post
281
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held19 (29 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total2,530
Reactions total159
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

309 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17556.6%
🔥3611.7%
👏216.80%
👍134.21%
💯123.88%
🥰123.88%
❤‍🔥92.91%
😁82.59%
🤣72.27%
51.62%
😭30.971%
🤔30.971%
🦄30.971%
😍20.647%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC183 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

☝️

7😁6💯4👍3👏2🔥2

Signed Анастасия Субботина

28 Jul 2026, 17:23 UTC270 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Искусство любить

6🔥1

Signed Анастасия Субботина

28 Jul 2026, 17:23 UTC252 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

«Если индивид способен к плодотворной любви, он любит также и себя; если он способен любить только других, он не способен любить вообще» «Эгоизм и любовь к себе отнюдь не равнозначны; более того - они противоположны. Эгоист любит себя скорее слишком мало... Именно недостаток любви к себе и порождает ЭГОИЗМ» «"Помешательство" друг на друге — доказательство силы их любви, хотя оно могло бы свидетельствовать тольк

10🥰3

Signed Анастасия Субботина

28 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC251 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Пришла к вам жаловаться на себя 😂 Ну до чего же медленно пишутся последние посты! Возможно, это связано с высокой чувствительностью самой темы - говоря о травмах и тренде на «травмированность» мне очень важно выразить свои мысли так, чтобы нехотя не обесценить чувства тех, кто испытывает страдание, и я ещё внимательнее, чем обычно, подхожу к выбору формулировок. Может быть сказывается немного растерянный за после

13👏2

Signed Анастасия Субботина

23 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC301 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

В последнее время замечаю некоторую тенденцию. Часто (разумеется не всегда!) когда люди говорят «я не хочу» (менять работу/разводиться/идти на свидание/переезжать/становиться родителем/всё что угодно ещё), это означает «хочу, но боюсь» Эти два состояния «не хочу, потому что мне это не нужно» и «не хочу, потому что боюсь» (а на самом деле хочу) очень важно уметь различать, чтобы не упустить важные для вас возможнос

6💯6🔥4

Signed Анастасия Субботина

21 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC288 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

8🥰1

Signed Анастасия Субботина

21 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC433 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026

«И не говорите мне, что мы должны безоговорочно соблюдать и отстаивать принцип свободы слова. Я и сам выступаю за свободу слова, но с одной оговоркой. Одной свободы мало. Свобода без ответственности может переродиться в произвол. Вот почему я часто говорил своим американским студентам, что рядом со Статуей Свободы надо бы воздвигнуть Статую Ответственности» В. Франкл - Страдания от бессмысленности жизни

13👏8👍4

Signed Анастасия Субботина

20 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC299 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026

* Диагноз - это важная часть преодоления последствий травмы, потому что помогает хотя бы немного структурировать хаос -«я не сумасшедший, оказывается у этого ада внутри меня есть название» Поэтому в посте я говорю о крайности, когда диагноз используют не в медицинском значении, а в качестве модного аксессуара при самодиагностике. Более того, даже в случае реально поставленного диагноза, он не должен становиться ед

24🦄3👍1

Signed Анастасия Субботина

20 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC253 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Тренд на психологические травмы «Я ожидал совершенно другого подарка на день рождения, конечно, меня тогда это сильно травмировало» «Когда я приходила домой с 4 по контрольной, моя мама таааак закатывала глаза…сейчас я понимаю, насколько сильно меня это травмировало» Пожалуй, называть буквально любой дискомфорт или фрустрацию психологической травмой - один из самых популярных трендов последних лет. Травма буквал

👏98🔥3💯2

Signed Анастасия Субботина

14 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC375 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

7😍2

Signed Анастасия Субботина

14 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC345 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Кьеркегор указывает на то, что «сила личности» развивается тогда, когда человек учится противостоять ситуациям, вызывающим тревожность. Это и есть путь, который способствует достижению личностной зрелости. ______ Ролло Мэй

16

Signed Анастасия Субботина

13 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC386 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Выбирайте, с чего начнем?

  1. Почему психологи так «любят копаться в детстве» и для чего это нужно?29%
  2. Тренд на краткосрочную терапию. От чего зависит скорость и продолжительность работы?36%
  3. Во всем виноваты родители? Связь между воспитанием и текущими проблемами25%
  4. Тренд на психологические травмы39%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Анастасия Субботина

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @psychotherapist_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTCAnonymous Poll56 voters

Выбирайте, с чего начнем?

  1. Почему психологи так «любят копаться в детстве» и для чего это нужно?29%
  2. Тренд на краткосрочную терапию. От чего зависит скорость и продолжительность работы?36%
  3. Во всем виноваты родители? Связь между воспитанием и текущими проблемами25%
  4. Тренд на психологические травмы39%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 548,228 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психотерапевтические заметки” (@psychotherapist_notes), 1,343 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychotherapist_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.