Channel
@psychology788
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,054subscribers
-80 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001446459609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psychology788 |
| Description | فاطمه تقویزاده | روانشناس بالینی دکتر محمدحسین رحمانی | پزشک 232306 دانش آموخته وتحت سوپروایزر پروفسور بهرامعلی قنبری رزرو وقت مشاوره: https://t.me/+_us-Ri9ZDY8wOWJk ارتباط با من: @Fatemeh_th789 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psychology788 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 8,054 | -41 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 8,095 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 8,109 | -17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 8,126 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 8,134 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 8,134 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (4 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,122 |
| Reactions total | 393 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
393 reactions across 48 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 336 | 85.5% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 8.14% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 2.80% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 1.78% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.02% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.254% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.254% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.254% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 393reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
برنامه ریزی روزانه افراد موفق که بابد انجام بدن: - بیدار شدن انجام روتین صبح: ساعت ۵-۸ صبح ( برنامه ریزی، چک لیست، صبحانه مقوی، ورزش سبک) - کار کردن رسیدگی به زندگی مالی: ساعت ۸-۱۶ ظهر (کار ثابت روزانه، سرمایه گذاری، بیزنس) - یادگیری مهارت آموزش دیدن: ساعت ۱۶-۱۸ بعدظهر ( یادگیری مهارت، دوره دیدن، تمرین و مهارت ها و تخصص)- - وقت آزاد و فعال: ساعت ۱۸تا ۲٠شب ( ورزش سنگین، استراحت، بودن با خانواده) - آنالیز رو…
❤4👎3
Signed Fatemeh
بچها من خیلی تلاش میکنم محاوره ایی بگم ولی زبان عامیانه تر سعی میکنم مطرح کنم ویس ها چی میتونید ارتباط بگیرید؟!
❤7👍3
Signed Fatemeh
https://t.me/psychology788/16187 جسارت نمیکنم نظر شخصیم هست خیلی علمی و روانشناسی بگین زیاد ما شناختی نداریم.نمیتونیم ارتباط بگیریم ولی اگر واضح تر و ساده و خلاصه بنویسید خیلی قشنگ تره و بیشتر درک میکنیم واقعا...
❤2👏1
Signed Fatemeh
https://t.me/NoronChat_bot?start=sec-caecigdghi
Signed Fatemeh
خب، فکر میکنم اینجا دیگه جای خوبی باشه که برای امشب نگهش داریم. چیزی که از این قسمت برای من خیلی پررنگ بود، همین جمله نیچه بود که میگفت: «کسی که چرایی برای زیستن داشته باشه، از پس هر چگونگی برمیاد.» شاید بد نباشه امشب هرکدوممون یه لحظه به این فکر کنیم که «چراییِ من برای ادامه دادن چیه؟
❤7
Signed Fatemeh
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed Fatemeh
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed Fatemeh
ری اکت هاتون کمه ها👀🥲
❤7
Signed Fatemeh
یعنی ممکن بود یه فرد تا یه مدت هنوز سرپا باشه، اما به محض اینکه امیدش به آینده رو از دست میداد، خیلی سریع از نظر روحی و حتی جسمی شروع به فروپاشی میکرد. این قسمت به نظرم خیلی قابل تأمله؛ چون نشون میده امید فقط یه احساس قشنگ و مثبت نیست که داشتنش خوب باشه؛ گاهی واقعاً میتونه تبدیل بشه به چیزی که به آدم توان ادامه دادن میده. و البته منظور فرانکل از امید، این نیست که بشینیم و منتظر یه اتفاق خوب باشیم. بیشتر منظورش ا…
❤9
Signed Fatemeh
و نکته جالب اینه که فرانکل میگه این فروپاشی معمولاً آرومآروم و قابل پیشبینی اتفاق نمیافتاد؛ گاهی خیلی ناگهانی اتفاق میافتاد
❤4
Signed Fatemeh
اینجا فرانکل یه نکته خیلی مهم دیگه رو مطرح میکنه. از اسپینوزا نقل میکنه که وقتی ما بتونیم عواطف و احساساتمون رو واضح و دقیق بشناسیم و بفهمیم چه اتفاقی داره درونمون میفته، اون احساس دیگه اون قدرت قبلی رو برای رنج دادن ما نداره. بعد دوباره برمیگرده به زندانیهای اردوگاه و میگه آدمهایی که امیدشون به آینده رو از دست داده بودن، خیلی بیشتر در معرض فروپاشی قرار میگرفتن. چون وقتی آدم دیگه هیچ تصویری از آینده نداشته با…
❤4
Signed Fatemeh
بعد فرانکل یه نقلقول خیلی قشنگ میاره و زندگی رو به رفتن پیش دندانپزشک تشبیه میکنه؛ چون ما معمولاً قبل از اینکه اتفاق سختی بیفته، مدام منتظریم که بدترین قسمت از راه برسه و ازش میترسیم، درحالیکه وقتی اون لحظه میرسه و میگذره، میبینیم که ما ازش عبور کردیم. و این خیلی شبیه زندگی خودمونه؛ خیلی وقتها ما از چیزی میترسیم که هنوز اتفاق نیفتاده و فکر میکنیم «اگه این اتفاق بیفته، دیگه نمیتونم»، ولی وقتی بهش میرسیم …
❤6
Signed Fatemeh
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @psychology788. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@psychology788 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مجله روانشناسی” (@psychology788), 8,054 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychology788.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.