Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Psixologik bilimlar

Channel

Psixologik bilimlar

@psixologikbilimlar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,209subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001412603336
TypeChannel
Username@psixologikbilimlar
Created11 June 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psixologikbilimlar

Growth

5,2095,2405,224.56 August 2026 — 5,240 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,238 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,221 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,223 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,209 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,204–5,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:435,209-14
13 Aug 2026, 12:185,223+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:165,221-17
7 Aug 2026, 02:535,238-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:045,240first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 5,209 subscribers
Avg views / post
721
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.288%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held40 (26 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total28,858
Reactions total58
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 26 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3869.1%
👍1323.6%
👏23.64%
😁23.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC266 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

UNIVERSITETGA KIRA OLMASLIK HAYOTINGIZGA NUQTA QO'YDIMI? Qizaloq necha yillab tayyorlandi, ammo orzuidagi universitetga kira olmadi. Hozir hamma "endi nima qilasan?", "qachon turmushga chiqasan?" deb so'raydi. O'zini butunlay omadsizdek his qilyapti, kelajagi yo'qdek tuyulyapti. Shu bosim ostida o'ziga bo'lgan ishonchi pasaygan. 😔 Unutmang, universitet diplomidan ham muhimroq narsalar bor: sizning mahoratingiz, qiz

2👍2

11 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC351 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TELEFONNI QO'YA OLMASLIGINGIZ SHUNCHAKI IRODASIZLIK EMAS! 🤔 • Dars qilish, ishga kirishish o'rniga telefon varaqlayapsiz. Bu og'ir vazifadan qochish, miya oson dopamin qidiradi. Yechim: Ishni 5 daqiqalik bo'laklarga bo'lib, telefonni boshqa xonaga qo'yib, bittasini bajaring. • "Bugun qilaman" deb, baribir kechiktirasiz. Ko'pincha bu "yaxshi bajara olmasamchi?" degan qo'rquvdan. Yechim: Vazifani yozing. Boshlashdan

11 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC400 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

XAVOTIRIM HAQIQATMI YOKI MIYAMNING O'YINIMI? Tunda o'tmishni o'ylab, yoki kelajakdan "yomon narsalar" kutib uyqu qochyaptimi? "Yaqinlarim norozi bo'lmasmikin?", "Imtihondan yiqilmasmikin?" kabi xayollar tinchlik bermayaptimi? 😔 Har bir xavotir real muammo emas. Amaliy mashq: Qog'ozga barcha xavotirlarni yozing. Yoniga: "Bu hozir hal qilsam bo'ladigan muammomi?" Agar "ha" bo'lsa, "Birinchi qadamim nima?" Agar "yo'q"

👍2

11 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC463 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TASHQI KO'RINISHINGIZGA QARSHI HAZILLAR OG'IR BOTADIMI? Ko‘chada, ishda yoki hatto yaqinlar davrasida "ozib ketibsanu", "yuzingga nima qildi" kabi "hazillar" eshitish tanish holat. Ba'zida bu gaplar shunchalik ta'sir qiladiki, odamlar oldiga chiqishga, kamerani yoqishga ham tortinasiz. Lekin sizning qadringiz, aql-idrokingiz tashqi ko‘rinishingiz bilan o‘lchanmaydi. • Bilib qo‘ying: Ko‘pincha bunday "hazillar"ni ayt

3👍2

10 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC483 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

DO'STLAR FAQAT KERAK BO'LGANDA ESLAYDIGAN HOLAT TANISHMI? Yaqin do'stingizga doim yordam berasiz. Lekin ishi bitgach, u sizdan uzoqlashib, faqat yana biror yumush tushganda eslaydi. Bu holatdan charchadingizmi? 🤔 BUNDAY DEMANG: 'Ular faqat o'z manfaatini o'ylaydi, qadriga yetmaydigan do'stlarim bor.' BUNDAY DENG: 'Men chin do'stlikni qadrlayman. Munosabatlar ikki tomonlama bo'lishini va o'zaro hurmatni istayman.'

2

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC570 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

DANGASA DEYISH O'RNIGA NIMA QILISH KERAK? "O'g'lim abituriyent, darsga qaramaydi. Jahl ustida 'Qachon odam bo'lasan, dangasa?!' dedim." Bunday yorliqlar bolaning o'ziga ishonchini sindirib, uni sizdan uzoqlashtiradi. Yechim: Shaxsiyatiga emas, xatti-harakatiga murojaat qiling. "Darslaringga kamroq vaqt ajratayotganing meni kelajaging haqida xavotirga soladi. Nima bo'lyapti, gaplashsak bo'ladimi?" Shu orqali tinglas

10 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC528 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

YORDAM SO'RASH KUCHSIZLIK ALOMATIMI? Ko'pincha "Kuchli odam hech qachon yordam so'ramaydi" degan noto'g'ri tushuncha bizni qiynaydi. Aslida, insonning chegaralari bor. Doimiy stressdan keyin "yeb qo'ydim" deyish, yoki imtihon oldidan do'stdan tushuntirish so'rash — kuchsizlik emas, balki vaziyatni to'g'ri baholashdir. Yordam so'rash o'z-o'ziga g'amxo'rlik qilish va muammoni hal etishga bo'lgan chinakam xohishni ko'r

10 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC525 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

MUNOSABATDA DOIM MEN KECHIRIM SO'RAYAPMANMI? 🤔 Munosabatlarda doim siz birinchi bo'lib kechirim so'raysizmi, hattoki ayb faqat sizda bo'lmasa ham? Bu muvozanatsizlik hissi ichki norozilikni keltirib chiqaradi. Aslida, mas'uliyatni teng baham ko'rish muhim. O'zingizni xafa his qilganingizni muloyimlik bilan bildirish, vaziyatni o'zgartirishga yordam beradi. Tayyor jumlalar: • "Men ham bu holatda xafa bo'ldim. Keling

9 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC559 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

HISSIYOTGA BERILMASLIKNING OSON YO'LI Nafas oling va kuzating. Hissiyotlar kuchayganda, bir zumga to'xtab, chuqur nafas oling. Hissiyotni tana hissi sifatida kuzating, uni tahlil qilmang, shunchaki borligini tan oling. Keyin hissiyotni nomlang: "Men hozir g'azabni his qilyapman" yoki "Xavotir meni qamrab olmoqda". Psixologiyada bu "affektni nomlash" (affect labeling) deb ataladi. Tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatadiki, his

9 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC558 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ONGNI TINCHLANTIRISH SIRI Ko'pincha xayollarimiz o'tmish yoki kelajakda kezib yuradi. Bu esa bezovtalik va stressni keltirib chiqarishi mumkin. 😔 Kichik mashq: Kundalik yumushlardan birini bajarayotganda (masalan, ovqatlanayotganda, choy ichayotganda yoki yuvinayotganda) bor e'tiboringizni faqat bitta his-tuyg'uga qarating. Suvning tovushini, choyning ta'mini yoki oyoqlaringiz yerga tegishini ongli ravishda his qil

👍1

9 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC573 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TINGLASH SAN'ATI: MUNOSABATLARNI MUSTAHKAMLAYMIZ Ko'pincha suhbatdoshimizni eshitishdan ko'ra, unga javob berishga shoshilamiz. Bu munosabatlarda tushunmovchiliklarga sabab bo'lishi mumkin. Haqiqiy tinglash – bu faqat so'zlarni eshitish emas, balki his-tuyg'ularni va aytilmagan xabarlarni ham ilg'ay olish demakdir. Suhbatdoshingizga to'liq e'tibor qarating, uning fikrlarini hurmat qiling. Bu oddiy qoida muloqotingiz

1

9 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC559 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TUGALLANMAGAN ISHLAR MIYAMIZDA NEGA UZOQ QOLADI? Hech e'tibor berganmisiz, bajarilmay qolgan vazifalar yoki tugatishga ulgurmagan rejalar miyamizdan chiqmaydi? Bu psixologiyada "Zaygarnik effekti" deb ataladi. Bizning ongimiz tugallanmagan ishlarni eslab qolishga moyil bo'ladi, chunki u ularni yakunlashga undaydi. Bu effektni o'z manfaatingizga ishlating: murakkab vazifani boshlashdan oldin uni kichik qismlarga bo'l

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @psixologikbilimlar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 454,677 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Psixologik bilimlar” (@psixologikbilimlar), 5,209 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psixologikbilimlar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.