کدام درب را انتخاب کنیم تا زنده بمانیم؟ درب شماره 1 درب شماره 2 درب شماره 3 مشاهده ی جواب👇 https://t.me/+SgFvRtfWrp8yOGVk

Channel
پروکسی * کلیپ | proxy
@proxyhots
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,231subscribers
-218 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001297650210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proxyhots |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proxyhots |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 7,231 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 7,241 | -9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 7,250 | -21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 7,271 | -26 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 7,297 | -26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 7,323 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:59 | 7,333 | -19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 7,352 | -16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 7,368 | -43 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 7,411 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 7,437 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 7,449 | first reading |
Engagement
112 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 112 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 16m 24s
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 7 | 58.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
یه دوتیکه شیک راحتی خریدم رفتم شمال همه جا تنم بود همه عاشقش شده بودن هیچکی باورش نمیشه فقط یه تومن خریدممم از اینجا 😍⬆️ https://t.me/+kMRGF0Nsgds0NjI0
https://t.me/proxy?server=62.238.104.36&port=443&secret=dd79e7010200010007f0030386e24c3add https://t.me/proxy?server=37.27.44.29&port=443&secret=dd79e7010200010007f0030386e24c3add tg://proxy?server=185.204.171.178&port=443&secret=b66278a57abcbcb0ad930388febf0b21
فاصله تو تا BMW فقط یک لایف استاره! 🌟 انرژی زا لایف استار جایزهدار بخر و شانست رو برای بردن BMW بیشتر کن.🎁 برای آشنایی بیشتر با قرعهکشی BMW، روی لینک زیر کلیک کن. https://bo0.ir/TLG1 #2853
دیگه همه چی تموم شد 🐾🙃😸 💝 کانالهای ما 👉🏿
خواهرم امروز بعد دوساعت از آشپزخونه اومد اومد بیرون با یه لیوان به دست نگاه کردم دیدم یه نوشیدنی با قیافه خوشگل دستشه که میخورد خوشمزه باشه 😌 گفت این چیه بده بخورم ،گفت فقط یه قلوپ آقا نگممم براتون از مزش 😂گفت لعنتی چه خوشمزس پاشو برامنم درست کن ادرس این کانالو داد گفت خودت پاشو درست کن از اونموقع هروز نوشیدنی هایی که تو کافه خداتومن میفروشن اینجا رایگان یاد داده درست میکنم میخورم🙈 https://t.me/+KbXBzCvd7Z8wNDI0
معنی جفت شدن ساعت ها :⏱ 01:01. 06:06. 12:12. 20:20 02:02. 07:07. 13:13. 21:21 03:03. 08:07. 14:14. 22:22 04:04. 09:09. 15:15. 23:22 05:05. 10:10. 16:16. 00:00
چراهمش ساعات جفت میبینیم؟ این سوال را خیلی ها از خودشون میپرسن! این یه نشونه از فرشتگانه که از طریق کتاب های علوم غریبه جمع اوری شده اگر خیلی دوست داری معانی ساعت های جفت را بدونی پیشنهاد میکنم یه سر به این کانال بزنی؛ https://t.me/+UlCQ42jLQIFlMzlk
https://t.me/proxy?server=194.60.228.4&port=2096&secret=eeNEgYdJvXrFGRMCIMJdCQ https://t.me/proxy?server=89.167.48.67&port=443&secret=dd79e7010200010007f0030386e24c3add https://t.me/proxy?server=46.62.247.86&port=443&secret=dd79e7010200010007f0030386e24c3add
اینجوری خبر بـ..د رو به کسی نمیدن که😂😂 💝 کانالهای ما 👉🏿
هیچوقت منتظر یه لحظه ی عالی نباش، از لحظه استفاده کن و عالیش کن صبح تون بخیر🌹 💝 کانالهای ما 👉🏿
یا مَنِ إسمهُ دَواء و ذِکرِهُ شِفاء خدای مهربانم✨ همه بیماران را شفا بده مریضی و بیماری را از ما دور بگردان خدای مهربانم✨ مردم عزیز سرزمینم را در پناه خودت به سلامت حفظ فرما🙏 آمین ✨شبتون در پناه امن الهی✨ 💝 کانالهای ما 👉🏿
Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @proxyhots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mahbanouu · 33,904
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 September 2026
@heseeeekhub · 28,616
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
@ashpazbashe96 · 20,882
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 25 September 2026
@montazer313_ir · 21,315
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پروکسی * کلیپ | proxy” (@proxyhots), 7,231 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proxyhots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.