Встречаем французский виски.

Channel
Pro Whisky
@prowhisky
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,074subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001360842013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prowhisky |
| Created | 23 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prowhisky |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 2,074 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 2,078 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 2,080 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 2,081 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 2,085 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 2,084 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 2,084 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 10 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Сегодня за Италию. Граппа - почти коньяк, но не он. Тоже из винограда, но из отходов винного производства. Данный экземпляр выдерживался два года в дубовой бочке и столько же финишировался в бочке из-под портвейна. И на вкус, и на запах – сладкий изюм.
Ну, за Японию. Добили сегодня с кошкой этот экземпляр. На нюх кисловат, как сидр, однако во вкусе яблоки замечены не были.
Ну, за Россию.
Антикризисные запасы были немного скорректированы за прошедшие два месяца. Теперь обсуждаем с кошкой дальнейшую стратегию. Японский бленд, который вызвал наибольший интерес у пушистого, оказался кисловатым, и я не думаю, что в этом направлении у нас будет единодушие.
К кризисам готов.
Когда последний раз этот "викинг" гостил у меня дома, то с ним мы не нашли общий язык. А давеча в одном замечательном баре решили взять его для разнообразия и вспомнить былое. И он сразу же удивил мощным яблоком с первого вдоха – вот уж чего я не ожидал ни от него, ни от кого-бы то ни было. Теперь он снова в гостях. Разговариваем о высоком.
Как никак пятница на дворе. Кто что пьет после трудовой недели? Хвастаемся в чате.
Дамы и господа, всем желаю найти сегодня под ёлкой не только котов, но и хороший виски, чтобы встретить Новый год в правильном настроении и с правильным напитком, а это несомненный залог успеха на будущий год, а возможно и на последующие 🥃
Один виски - хорошо, но пять лучше. Сегодня путешествуем по айле в одном известном московском баре (сами догадайтесь в каком)
Когда завтра на работу, а виски еще не допил.
Сегодня дегустируем Oban 14 и смотрим в ночь. Оубэн, как написано на русской этикетке, пока не разочаровывает и уже полбутылки держится достойно. Типичный пряно-цветочный Хайленд с дерзкой перчинкой. Рекомендуем.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @prowhisky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,444,446 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pro Whisky” (@prowhisky), 2,074 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prowhisky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.