Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Про UX, UI и AI🧨

@prouxui

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,831subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701343046
TypeChannel
Username@prouxui
Created14 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prouxui

Growth

2,8312,8452,8387 August 2026 — 2,845 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,845 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,844 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,839 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,831 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,829–2,847 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:252,831-8
11 Aug 2026, 04:212,839-5
8 Aug 2026, 07:112,844-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:322,845no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:282,845first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 2,831 subscribers
Avg views / post
443
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held18 (14 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,101
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4633.1%
🔥2820.1%
😁2618.7%
1611.5%
💯85.76%
❤‍🔥64.32%
🤮53.60%
🤯21.44%
💘10.719%
🤔10.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC212 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Уже некоторое время делаю на движке unreal + claude гонки на выживание в стиле безумного Макса. Сзади подгоняет песчаная буря которая медленно тебя убьет. А ты появляешься на свалке вместе с остальными и собираешь из мусора тарантайке или отбираешь ее у других и мчишь вперёд по процедурно сгенерированому миру, пока постоянно ускоряющийся шторм не убьет всех кроме победителя. Ну и в дороге останавливаешься заправитьс

❤‍🔥6

31 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC363 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас эмодзи в каналах ТГ служат неким выражением эмоций к посту и направлены к автору. После того как вы поставили эмодзи, больше никакой прямой ценности он вам уже не принесет. А что если не обязательно так? Что если для реакций добавить немного логики. И чтобы через месяц можно было бы открыть статистику разных каналов и увидеть, например: «Из последних 50 постов мне понравились всего 7». И сразу становится оче

👍5🤮5💯1

27 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC462 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Размышление модепи (reasoning) в claude code Отличаются от размышления в обычном режиме. вместо него там таблица с командами (скрин 1). А в режиме обычного чата - оставили план и мысли(скрин 2). Уж не знаю это баг или фича. Связано ли это с особенностями работы claude code Или с попыткой оптимизировать количество токенов. Остается только гадать. Чатгпт вообще в чатовом режиме не юзает размышления , (или просто н

24 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC531 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Антропик: Fable слишком умная мы не будем её сразу выпускать и будем полмесяца с властями ее обрезать, лучше мы выпустим опус 5 который ещё умнее. (Его не страшно, он ведь опус называется. Если бы мифос назывался тогда небезопасно, а так - абсолютно безопасно). 🤡 Кстати анус опус 5 вышел, пойду чекать

24 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC455 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Сходу не могу придумать удобное применение где либо этой штуки, но как залипательно то! Upd. Гипотетически на тач устройствах больших будет плюс-минус юзабельно

👍7

16 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC587 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Предлагаю уже дать наконец этому явлению название. Я предлагаю "слопоточки" или "скитлс" При сборке кода ии почему то везде пытается запихнуть эти ебучие точки цветные. У него наверное скитлстрянка

😁84💯1

13 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC672 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Навайбкодил себе сайт razraz.pro. Если захотите посмотреть - рекомендую с десктопа смотреть - так больше функционала и визуала Это уже 4 итерация. не могу определиться с концепцией. Хочется платформу для экспериментов, зеркало тг блога, портфолио. Так что, то, что сейчас - не окончательное и буду еще видоизменять

👍103🤯2

6 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC695 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А у меня новая ачивка) Она навела меня на мысль написать этот пост. Дисклеймер: Для кого-то эта информация может оказаться диким баяном-бабаяном. Если так - просто скипните - он не для вас. В 1996-м Ричард Бартл, соавтор первой многопользовательской игры, заметил странную закономерность: люди в одном и том же виртуальном мире хотят принципиально разного. Одни качают персонажа, другие лезут за край карты, третьи час

🔥21👍9

1 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC636 viewsread 7 August 2026

Попробовал новый Соннет 5. Он довольно хорошо работает в Claude design. Шустрее опуса прям ощутимо и мозгов хватает на работу с дизайн системой и сборкой по скринам.

28 Jun 2026, 15:50 UTC690 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

На этих выходных дошли руки поковырять мехаруку. Я понял, что пока я не хочу прям манипулятор и поэтому часть сервоприводов убрал, оставил поворотный и наклонный. Накрепко закрепил свою старую вебку и навайбкодил авто отслеживание лица. Дальше жду gpt5.6 или фейбл на следующей неделе. опус не справляется с последующим шагом. А пока - все спаять и замотать изолентой

👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @prouxui. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 977,347 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Про UX, UI и AI🧨” (@prouxui), 2,831 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prouxui.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.