Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for протеиновая принцесса👑

Channel

протеиновая принцесса👑

@proteinpr1ncess

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,303subscribers

+2,102 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003984787564
TypeChannel
Username@proteinpr1ncess
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 19 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/proteinpr1ncess

Growth

10,20112,30311,25223 August 2026 — 10,201 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,880 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,194 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,348 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,490 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,831 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,020 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,118 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,198 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,211 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,254 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,303 subscribers23 August 20264 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 12 days, net +2,102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,886–12,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 05:5612,303+49
2 Sept 2026, 20:4412,254+43
1 Sept 2026, 16:5912,211+13
31 Aug 2026, 20:2412,198+80
30 Aug 2026, 17:4412,118+98
29 Aug 2026, 19:5412,020+189
28 Aug 2026, 17:1911,831+341
27 Aug 2026, 19:0511,490+142
26 Aug 2026, 18:5811,348+154
25 Aug 2026, 19:2411,194+314
24 Aug 2026, 16:4910,880+679
23 Aug 2026, 16:3010,201first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 19 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.4%
avg views ÷ 12,303 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,240
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held55 (19 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total233,080
Reactions total5,083
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,083 reactions across 55 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,39766.8%
💘56311.1%
😭2354.62%
💋1723.38%
❤‍🔥1432.81%
🔥1042.05%
😨661.30%
😢651.28%
😍490.964%
🍓460.905%
👍420.826%
😱400.787%
custom 5240141288333937617330.649%
🤣220.433%
🤩220.433%
💔210.413%
🌚110.216%
🥰110.216%
👏60.118%
🤗50.098%
13 further kinds300.59%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,083 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,180
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 55 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
350
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @proteinpr1ncess. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:12 UTC≈2,250 views103 reactionsread 2 September 2026

А пока только 19:00, поэтому посмотрим что еще я съем за сегодня… но к сожалению кастрюли риса больше нет…

74💘17💋12

2 Sept 2026, 16:12 UTC≈2,320 views110 reactionsread 2 September 2026

После недосыпа организму банально не хватает энергии и поэтому он ищет источник быстрых углеводов Поэтому что бы такого не было, высыпайтесь и любите себя 🫶🏻

73💘22💋15

2 Sept 2026, 16:12 UTC≈2,340 views145 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вот что бывает, если не спать всю ночь.. Когда вы не спите у вас очень сильно повышается аппетит на углеводную еду.. Что же я съела? Я не ела зефир, мармеладки и тд, мне этого не хотелось. Я вьебала 600г риса, закусила 500г дыни и съела 400г яблок. Это не был срыв, мне просто каждых 15 минут хотелось есть рис. Я приготовила его чтобы снять вам рецепт роллов и онигири, но видать прийдется варить еще..

89😭36💘13💋4❤‍🔥2💔1

2 Sept 2026, 11:33 UTC≈3,340 views168 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍎ИДЕИ ПП ПЕРЕКУСОВ В ШКОЛУ 1. Онигири 2. Конвертики 3. Яичная тортилья 4. Питьевая овсянка 5. Питьевой йогурт+чиа+банан 6. Творожная булочка 7. Творожный бэйгл 8. Сэндвич 9. Ролл 10. Творожная ватрушка 11. Творожная пицца 12. Сочники 13. Блины с начинкой 14. Панкейки 15. Пирог 16. Морковная тортилья 17. Пирог улитка 18. Кексы Пишите, на что первым рецепт🫶🏻

115💋28🍓16❤‍🔥5💘3🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC≈3,750 views118 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Эксперимент без сахзама День 2 Несколько моих тарелочек за эти 2 дня. Страшно это говорить, но вздутий нету ВООБЩЕ. Видно это реально все от сахзама.. Что ли реально от него отказаться.. Сладкого не хочется, только очень хочу хлебцев. Все время только о них и думаю..

💘7521🔥15❤‍🔥5🍓2

31 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈3,650 views23 reactionsread 2 September 2026

На весь (330 г): К 319 ккал Б 27,4 г Ж 7,1 г У 37,1 г На 100 г: К 97 ккал Б 8,3 г Ж 2,2 г У 11,2 г

💘203

31 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈4,040 views58 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍎ЯБЛОЧНЫЙ КОНВЕРТИК Лаваш 50г Яблоко 100г Молоко 30мл Творог 0% 100г Корица Сахзам Яйцо Яблоко натереть на терке/нарезать кубиками. Добавить корицу, сахзам, творог и половину яйца. Завернуть начинку в лаваш. Другую половину яйца смешать с молоком и обмакнуть в ней лаваш. Разогреть сковороду и обжарить конвертик без масла с двух сторон до золотистой корочки #рецепт #яблочный_конвертик

51❤‍🔥4🎃1💘1🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈3,990 views334 reactions203 Starsread 2 September 2026

Прочитала много ваших комментариев по поводу сахзама и решила сделать над собой эксперимент. Отказаться от сахзама на неделю( пп рецепты будут) Расскажу вам как ощущения, есть ли вздутие и пропадет ли привыкание. На 100 реакций стаю вашей подопытной крысой👼 Питание показываю тут https://t.me/tvoroginichego

244👍35💘29😱10custom 52401412883339376179🔥4🍓3

30 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈4,000 views54 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

СГУЩЕНКА БЕЗ САХАРА Молоко 1% 400 Крахмал 8 Ксантанова камедь 1г Ваниль Сахзам Какао 20 (По желанию) Смешать молоко, крахмал, какао, сахзам и ваниль. Проварит на среднем огне до желанной консистенции. Снять с огня, добавить камедь и пробить блендером. Сделать сгущенку можно без камеди, текстура будет немного другая, но все равно получится очень вкусно.

40💘9🔥5

30 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈3,930 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🎇 КБЖУ Шоколадная ПП-сгущенка На весь десерт: 250 ккал Белки: 17 г Жиры: 6,2 г Углеводы: 27,7 г ⸻ На 100 г: 58 ккал Белки: 4 г Жиры: 1,4 г Углеводы: 6,4 г ⸻ ПП-сгущенка без какао На весь десерт: 188 ккал Белки: 12,4 г Жиры: 4 г Углеводы: 25 г ⸻ На 100 г: 46 ккал Белки: 3 г Жиры: 1 г Углеводы: 6,1 г

21💘6

30 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈4,140 views75 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Отзыв на мою прошлую пп сгущенку. Она на самом деле почти ничем не отличается от прошлой. Я уже просто по привычке везде сую это сухое молоко)) Спасибо за теплые слова, всех люблю🫶🏻🫶🏻

52💘12❤‍🔥11

29 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC≈4,560 views69 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вся ваша еда за август🫶🏻 (тут реально все, кто кидал) Надеюсь всем был очень вкусно и эта еда у вас не вызывала чувства вины;) Если тоже хотите попасть в эту рубрику скидывайте свою еду сюда https://t.me/tvoroginichego

42💘14❤‍🔥8💋3🤗2

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @proteinpr1ncess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@proteinpr1ncess edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTCAnonymous Poll1,830 voters approx.

На что дальше рецепт?

  1. Сырок на 20кк80%
  2. Сгущенка на 50кк32%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTCAnonymous Poll2,090 voters approx.

.

  1. 35029%
  2. 40029%
  3. 45019%
  4. 0, ведь было вкусно24%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTCAnonymous Poll1,470 voters approx.

Что выставить первым?

  1. Пицца на 60г белка44%
  2. Сгущенка на 40г белка56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“протеиновая принцесса👑” (@proteinpr1ncess), 12,303 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proteinpr1ncess.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.