Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Думаю о ваших проектах

@projecthinking

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,409subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002397525717
TypeChannel
Username@projecthinking
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/projecthinking

Growth

1,4081,4091,408.57 August 2026 — 1,408 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,408 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,409 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,408–1,409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 22:151,409+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:161,408no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:341,408first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 17 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

819 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39748.5%
🔥10112.3%
custom 54608733843908306698910.9%
😁8410.3%
custom 5370867268051806190708.55%
🙏334.03%
💯303.66%
💔121.47%
😍20.244%
🤩10.122%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 819reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 12 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @projecthinking. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 March 2026 to 2 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC679 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Приходите спорить со мной (или нет) в тредс, уважаемые подписчики… 🙂

😁30💯17🔥104custom 54608733843908306691

29 Jun 2026, 04:22 UTC≈1,040 views99 reactions32 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У меня сегодня день рождения, мне 31 🤍 Не хочу спойлерить, но всё, через что ты проходишь, готовит тебя к тому, о чем ты просил.

60custom 537086726805180619020💯12custom 54608733843908306696🤩1

13 Jun 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,080 views158 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера не стало моей бабушки. На фото – мне 3 года и я в ее кабинете директора банка. Да, она точно никогда не была той бабушкой, которая печет пирожки или играет с тобой. Бабушка учила меня кодировать сейф, считать деньги, раздавать всем задачи и пиздюлей. Помню как она приезжала за мной в школу с личным водителем и мы долго говорили с ней о том как важно строить карьеру, ни от кого не зависеть и всегда выбирать се

81custom 537086726805180619050🔥15💔12

21 May 2026, 18:30 UTC≈1,320 views88 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Есть две двери Каждый вечер я проезжаю одну станцию с Белорусской по D4 от офиса до дома. Выход на станцию проходит через здание вокзала у которого есть 4+ двери для входа. В 19:30 у первых двух скапливается человек пятьдесят. И вот они там стоят и стоят, бесконечно долго и беспросветно, чтобы зайти в этот вокзал. Посмотрела я на это всё и подумала: НАХРЕНА они все стоят у этих двух входов, если их 4+?! И у последн

55🔥19🙏14

3 May 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,250 views137 reactionsread 7 August 2026

То что ты не меняешь, ты выбираешь За последние пару недель случилось много изменений: переезд, новая работа, новая роль и много чего ещё (об этом позже). Главное, что всё произошло быстро и в один момент. Я буквально в 20:00 бросила чемодан в угол, в 22:00 дочитала последнюю лекцию на курсе, а в 8 утра уже шагала в офис, чтобы получить свой руководский бейдж. Как вы поняли, первый абзац был оправданием, почему ко

85custom 546087338439083066931🔥20💯1

10 Apr 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,400 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😁😆😁 подумать о ваших проектах…

😁23

7 Apr 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,470 views26 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Собрали с ребятами из ХЗГ карточки с секретами хорошего фоллоу-апа. Поддержите реакциями и сохраняйте себе! 😎 *Советую долистать до конца, там найдете инструменты, которые я использую.

🔥129🙏5

6 Apr 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,150 views78 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почти 9 лет назад я переехала из Новосибирска в Москву. Помню как шла на собеседование SETTERS в Молоко на Большой Дмитровке, потом тестовое, а после мы уже сидим в офисе, где мой будущий руководитель чертит схему орг.структуры на салфетке и всё только начинается. На прошлой неделе почувствовала себя снова в той же петле времени. Я в Москве, иду на завтрак-знакомство в Eva, потом тестовое, а после мы уже сидим в офи

40custom 546087338439083066922🙏14🔥2

26 Mar 2026, 10:26 UTC≈1,200 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Личные петли и ловушки Сегодня читаю лекцию на курсе для руководителей и много думаю о том как часто управленцы придумывают сотни систем для оценки команды, а как оценить себя – не знают. Можно начать с малого. Ответьте себе прямо сейчас на несколько вопросов: 1. Скорость принятия решений. Как быстро мною/в компании принимаются решения после появления сигнала? 2. Зависимость системы от меня. Насколько работа кома

20🔥14custom 54608733843908306699

20 Mar 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,070 views24 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

0 дней без новых кейсов 🤝 Наша студия запустила новую игру для Альфа-Банка. Как вам? *Поддержите команду реакциями) 🤗

10🔥9custom 54608733843908306695

18 Mar 2026, 09:53 UTC987 views31 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Да, было. 🙂

😁23custom 54608733843908306698

17 Mar 2026, 09:02 UTC945 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мой пост снова залетел в Линкедин! ❓😎 (вы его тоже читали – про найм как дейтинг) Я в шоке, что столько людей пишут такие добрые комментарии и искренне благодарят за текст. Хочу всегда жить на этой стороне интернета! Мой любимый коммент: «сегодня я не зря заплатила за интернет» 😁🤝

33😁8custom 54608733843908306697😍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @projecthinking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 979,297 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Думаю о ваших проектах” (@projecthinking), 1,409 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/projecthinking.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.