Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Profit and loss 🌹

Channel

Profit and loss 🌹

@profit_and_loss

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

1,249subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001296655155
TypeChannel
Username@profit_and_loss
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/profit_and_loss

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2491,2661,257.56 August 2026 — 1,266 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,266 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,265 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,266 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,265 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,263 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,262 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,258 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,255 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,256 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,253 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,252 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,251 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,249 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,246–1,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:381,249-2
13 Sept 2026, 07:361,251-1
9 Sept 2026, 04:391,252-1
4 Sept 2026, 03:411,253-3
31 Aug 2026, 14:231,256+1
28 Aug 2026, 11:321,255-3
25 Aug 2026, 15:031,258-4
22 Aug 2026, 14:391,262-1
19 Aug 2026, 07:521,263-2
16 Aug 2026, 03:051,265-1
12 Aug 2026, 21:591,266+1
10 Aug 2026, 08:411,265-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:011,266no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:551,266first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 February 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

8 Feb 2024, 16:58 UTC≈6,220 viewsread 6 August 2026

rice case 10%discount and 800gm weight then sp/cp=[90/100][1000/800]=9/8 and wheat case 5% discount and 900 weight then sp/cp=[95/100][1000/900]=19/18 but cp1:cp2=1;2 so rice cp:sp=81:72 and wheat cp:sp=152/144 total cp=72+144=216 total sp=81+152=233 p%=[17/216]100=7.87 aapprx

Signed KAMAL M

8 Feb 2024, 16:57 UTC≈6,230 viewsread 6 August 2026

A shopkeeper offers a discount of 10% on rice and 5% on wheat and claims to offer these discount on the cost price. If the customer buys equal amounts of rice and wheat and ratio of cost prices of rice and wheat is 1:2, what is the total profit percentage of the shopkeeper if he uses a weight of 800gm for 1kg in case of rice and 900 gm for 1 kg in case of wheat?

Signed KAMAL M

29 Jan 2024, 17:11 UTC≈6,240 viewsread 6 August 2026

80/1.25= 64 A---> 2x and B----> x 20% of both lost in transit... To compensate for the same, price will be hiked by 25% for no profit no loss .. 2x---> 2.5x and x----> 1.4x+ 25% ie 1.75x (40% profit for wholesaler) Cost of mixture for no profit no loss will be 2x (2:1) Hence 2x= 64

Signed KAMAL M

29 Jan 2024, 05:26 UTC≈5,430 viewsread 6 August 2026

Let say Cost Prices are A & B Selling Price = 3S & 5S Profit = (16.25/100)A = 0.1625A A + 0.1625A = 3S => 1.1625A = 3S Profit = 0.1625A Profit = (16.25/100)5S = 0.8125S B + 0.8125S = 5S => B = 4.1875 S difference in the profits earned being Rs 585 0.8125S - 0.1625A = 585 => 0.8125S - 0.1625(3S/1.1625) = 585 => 0.8125S - 0.1625(3S/1.1625) = 585 => S = 1488 Difference in sale price = 5S - 3S =

Signed KAMAL M

29 Jan 2024, 04:22 UTC≈4,140 viewsread 6 August 2026

5x*13/80-3x*13/93=585 X=3*16*31 2x=2976 Or 13 93 *80*3 13 80*93*5 13*15—-585 1—3 3*31*16(5-3) = 2976

Signed KAMAL M

9 Dec 2023, 15:42 UTC≈4,680 viewsread 6 August 2026

80*66%=52.8 20*0.8%=0.16 20+0.16=20.16 52.8+20.16=72.96

Signed KAMAL M

25 Feb 2023, 06:26 UTC≈8,360 viewsread 6 August 2026

17:24)*16*5=1360:1920 16:25)*17*6=1632:2550 630=500 3280=2603 approx 17-----24 20.4----31.875 7.875===500 41====2603 17 : 24 16 = 20.4 25 = 31.875 7.875 = 500 41 = 2603 Original prices 17x 24x Increased prices 17*120%=20.4x 24x+500 20.4x/(24x+500)=16/25 510x=384x+8000 X=8000/126 Original prices=41x=41*(8000/126) =2603

Signed KAMAL M

25 Feb 2023, 06:25 UTC≈7,520 viewsread 6 August 2026

17*6/5*25/16=255/8 255/8 - 24 = 63/8 500*8/63*41 =2603.2

Signed KAMAL M

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @profit_and_loss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Profit and loss 🌹” (@profit_and_loss), 1,249 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profit_and_loss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.