26 measurements spanning 30 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,375–11,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 06:57
11,388
-6
4 Sept 2026, 02:37
11,394
-1
2 Sept 2026, 17:53
11,395
-3
1 Sept 2026, 14:45
11,398
+3
31 Aug 2026, 14:58
11,395
-2
30 Aug 2026, 15:53
11,397
-2
29 Aug 2026, 17:13
11,399
+10
28 Aug 2026, 16:16
11,389
-6
27 Aug 2026, 15:55
11,395
-6
26 Aug 2026, 16:57
11,401
-6
25 Aug 2026, 14:42
11,407
-5
24 Aug 2026, 17:11
11,412
-9
22 Aug 2026, 23:35
11,421
-2
21 Aug 2026, 16:12
11,423
-5
20 Aug 2026, 15:11
11,428
-1
18 Aug 2026, 12:28
11,429
-8
17 Aug 2026, 15:28
11,437
-1
16 Aug 2026, 07:18
11,438
-3
14 Aug 2026, 21:07
11,441
-15
13 Aug 2026, 10:34
11,456
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 11,388 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,770
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
50 (23 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
56,502
Reactions total
653
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,060 reactions across 50 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
778
73.4%
😢
80
7.55%
❤
62
5.85%
👌
52
4.91%
🔥
44
4.15%
🤝
30
2.83%
👏
11
1.04%
🍾
3
0.283%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,060 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 50 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @profinvestr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#OZON
📊 Из-за рисков ущерба складов, акции естественно свалились вниз, но тем самым сформировав перепроданность и рекордное количество ШОРТов.
👆Примечательно на 4Д ТФ сформировалось поглощение.
С учетом потенциала выхода ММВБ на 3-5% и выше указанных факторов- ожидаю локальный выход вверх около ~15%
🏦 Торгую здесь ◀️
💸 Торговый канал тут ◀️
💬Telegram | 💙VK | 📺YouTube |💳 MAX
❗️ https://vkvideo.ru/video-211097844_456239464 -Обзор российского рынка, ожидания. Как будем торговать+стратегия.
Это видео-отрывок из торгового канала.
Также разобрали какао, металлы, фьючерсы криптовалют, валюту и др. инструменты.
#газ Европейский (TTF)
👉 На фоне введения санкций США на Иран и продолжения ветви эскалации, евро- газ выходит из трех летнего накопления вверх. Причем раннее, в первых месяцах года, наблюдались рекордные притоки ликвидности, а количество шортов физиков на рекорде.
🚀Считаю импульс только в начале реализации. До конца года ожидаем разгон к 130 пн, локально до 90 пн.
🏦 Торгую здесь ◀️
💸 Торговый канал тут ◀️
💬T…
#IMOEX подтверждает выход вверх, локальный потенциал 2250-2350 пн.
📈До конца года ожидаем возможность выхода до 2500-2600, но на сентябрь боковое движение в диапазоне 2050-2250. Перед выборами в ГД будут различные провокации, усиление санкций и т.д, а вот в октябре уже есть все возможности начинать рост.
👆Пока начали аккуратно рассматривать отдельные сделки(на эфире давал примеры), при подтверждение будем усиливать…
Наблюдение:
Физики рекордными темпами ШОРТят #SMLT. Это одна, может и самая заШОРЧенная акций на рынке сейчас.
Пока идем на 400р, далее все озвученному плану.
#серебро
Подтвердились ожидания, поехали вниз, потенциал еще ~5%📉
Cкоро будут очень комфортные уровни для нового набора, более крупного 🤫
🏦 Торгую здесь ◀️
💸 Торговый канал тут ◀️
💬Telegram | 💙VK | 📺YouTube |💳 MAX
#какао
📊 Какао в своем репертуаре, под углом 90 градусов, продолжает безудержный вынос.
Запас свободного хода еще 7-10%, далее упремся в сопротивление.
🏦 Торгую здесь ◀️
💸 Торговый канал тут ◀️
💬Telegram | 💙VK | 📺YouTube |💳 MAX
#серебро - локальный потенциал
👉Серебро выходит из локального накопления на первую цель 72пн.
📊Тут важно отметить, 72 пн. важный стратегический уровень, а тем временем #DXY ломает нисходящий тренд переходя в отскок к 100 пн. Поэтому вероятнее всего от 72 увидеть отбой и переход в накопление на 2-4 недели.
Стратегически цель 90-95🚀 Ее обязательно будем целить, но пока заходить все же опасно.
👆Сейчас пока заходим в спекулятивные сделки на 10-20%. На сентябрь выпадает наборы по рынкам акций, металлов с потенциалами уже крупными. Кто желает пробовать торговать с нами, сейчас самое время, 3,4 кв. всегда супер активные ⚖️
#IMOEX
📊Начинаем выход к 2200-2250, но в целом на ближайшие недели ожидаю боковое движение.
Как ранее озвучивал, скопилось ряд факторов на отскок. Видны откупы ряда инструментов, разкорреляция с USDRUB, техническая перепроданность, широкий негатив скопивший ШОРТы.
Но самое интересное повод: скорее всего к ноябрю Трамп сможет организовать в каком либо формате локальное перемирие в небе и море.
Как все это торговат…
#какао
📊Цена выходит из накопления верх. Конечная цель ~600 пн.
Причем от 600 скорее будет формироваться крупный откат на 20-30%. Поэтому стоит быть аккуратнее
🏦 Торгую здесь ◀️
💸 Торговый канал тут ◀️
💬Telegram | 💙VK | 📺YouTube |💳 MAX
#USDRUB
В июне четко определили смену тренда (еще тут, тут разворот) и ее потенциалы, уточню локальные цели👆
📊Сейчас начинаем выход к 90, до конца года скорее успеем отработать и 100. На этих значения ожидаю стабилизацию и переход в торговый диапазон 80-100 на ближайший 2027г.
По социальным, политическим и экономическим причинам до 2030 года больших скачков не ожидаем, а вот после 30 года цели 200-250. Исторически …
👍26❤1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @profinvestr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@profinvestr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
DluxTrading @ddluuxx_trading · 43,161 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
INSpace | Инвестиции @INSpac3 · 34,511 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO инвестиции” (@profinvestr), 11,388 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profinvestr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.