Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PPanel Official

@ppanel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,081subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002158674181
TypeChannel
Username@ppanel
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ppanel

Growth

2,0812,0842,082.56 August 2026 — 2,084 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,084 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,081 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,081–2,084 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:222,081-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:412,084no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:512,084first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.5%
avg views ÷ 2,081 subscribers
Avg views / post
760
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.313%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (6 February 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,280
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1737.0%
1226.1%
🥰715.2%
🔥48.70%
👻36.52%
🌭12.17%
😁12.17%
🤣12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ppanel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
22.2%
4 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
5,130
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,550
over 13 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://github.com/wyx2685/v2board/issues/374 建议使用ppanel

28 May 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,360 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SlagLABVideo

SlagLAB出品,次时代VPN客户端为您呈现: 1,自研SlagCore©核心,Rust重构,无内存回收,极致轻量化与超强稳定性,全端小于40m,告别闪退 2,内嵌SlagPulse©节点地图,划时代的APP交互体验 3,第一款支持手机号注册(可选)的VPN客户端,为您带来巨量用户转化 4,v2board,x2board,SSP,PPANEL 等主流面板完美支持。 5,全端统一UI,可替换您自己的LOGO,大厂的审美设计,远超市面上的换壳产品 6,具备市面上其他客户端的所有功能,包括不限于 邀请/兑换码/工单/客服/oss托管等 7,开发组成员来自ExpressVPN等顶级大厂,拒绝技术拼凑 欢迎访问:Slaglab.com 获取客户端详细介绍以及三端DEMO下载 商务联系:@SlagAlex 技术支持:@SlagNeko 订阅频道 t.me/SlagLAB 群组 t.me/SlagGroup

2

20 May 2026, 12:56 UTC≈3,330 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎉 PPanel 版本更新公告 🔧 后端 Server — v1.2.14 - 新增节点级配置覆盖(IP 策略 / DNS / 拦截 / 出站),不影响全局默认值 - 扩展自定义出站字段,完整支持更多协议、TLS、Reality、TUIC 及原始回退配置 - 下发节点配置时自动合并全局与节点覆盖值 - 自动跳过空规则,避免生成无效 Xray 路由规则 - 包含 DB 迁移 02128_server_config_override,向后兼容 ⚙️ 节点端 ppanel-node — v1.1.2 - 完整支持结构化出站配置,覆盖协议:HTTP / SOCKS / Shadowsocks / VMess / VLESS / Trojan / AnyTLS / TUIC / Hysteria2 / direct / reject - 支持 TLS、Reality 及常用传输层选项 - 保留 settings / strea

6

14 May 2026, 07:33 UTC≈3,570 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisement

#ad 成都移动,一手资源现货,不接通报。联系 @QAQWERTDFBOT

22 Apr 2026, 15:03 UTC≈5,130 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisement

@gm_wallet_bot 全网最低价能量平台,仅需0.6 trx转账一笔!不钓鱼不诈骗,先充后用无需复制地址 全网最低价闪兑,用最少的钱获得最多的TRX 价格同步OKX闪兑价格 #ad

1

9 Apr 2026, 07:13 UTC≈5,770 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisement

黑马支付,专注机场VPN支付,源头通道,市场最低价! 支付宝最低:2.5% ,微信最低:3.5% ! 联系 @heimalisa 了解开户! #ad

👻3👍21

20 Mar 2026, 05:05 UTC≈6,590 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisement

@gm_wallet_bot 全网最低价能量平台,仅需0.9trx转账一笔!不钓鱼不诈骗,先充后用无需复制地址 #ad

15 Mar 2026, 10:23 UTC≈2,360 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @heki_news

Heki v1.0.5 Release Notes 🆕 New Features 1. PPanel 面板全协议对接 新增 PPanel 面板支持,支持 VMess、VLESS、SS、Trojan、Hysteria2、TUIC、AnyTLS、Naive、Mieru 共 9 种协议。脚本(setup/modify/install)同步支持 ppanel 选项。(ppanel订阅下发tuic,mieru协议有问题请参考群文件修改) 2. Naive HTTP/2 CONNECT 重写 Naive 协议支持 ALPN h2 3. 自签证书支持(cert_mode=self) 新增 cert_mode=self,自动生成自签证书,适用于 TUIC/Hysteria2 无域名部署。 4. SS2022 blake3-chacha20-poly1305 加密支持 补全 SS2022 全部三种加密算法。 5. 节点配置文件增强 [

2👍1

12 Mar 2026, 11:10 UTC≈4,550 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://github.com/perfect-panel/frontend/releases/tag/v1.3.15

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ppanel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 288,826 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PPanel Official” (@ppanel), 2,081 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppanel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.