5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,989–2,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 21:23
2,055
+33
13 Aug 2026, 07:26
2,022
+9
10 Aug 2026, 07:30
2,013
+15
7 Aug 2026, 06:38
1,998
-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:01
2,000
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.91%
avg views ÷ 2,055 subscribers
Avg views / post
142
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
19 (6 May 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
142
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
95
44.2%
🔥
45
20.9%
💯
27
12.6%
custom 5458464423133848629
14
6.51%
custom 5352702240744283431
10
4.65%
💔
6
2.79%
❤🔥
5
2.33%
custom 5267232219755199300
3
1.40%
💋
3
1.40%
😁
3
1.40%
😈
2
0.93%
custom 5352736836705854668
1
0.465%
😱
1
0.465%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @porarasslabitsa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🐚🐚🐚🐚🐚🐚
🐚🐚🐚🐚
16 августа, 19:00 до 23:00
Организатор SPA House
Банный рейв - это совмещение двух направлений и двух стихий.
Отдельная зона с парением и бассейном, зоны отдыха и зона абсолютного отрыва под диджейские сеты!
❤️Что нас ждет:
❤️Организованные зоны для танцев и парения ;
❤️Общий бар и фуршет;
❤️Практика общего знакомства;
❤️Отдельная зона с кальянами;
❤️Регулярные групповые парения;
❤️Баня на дровах;
❤️Б…
Питер! Ищу девушку-модель на обучение шибари
Будем отрабатывать базовые обвязки и узлы. Нужна девушка, которая спокойно воспримет такие манипуляции.
По форме рекомендую взять закрытые легинсы и футболку до локтей. Это первое практическое занятие, так что это про заботу о вашей коже.
⏰ 02.06, 21:00-23:00
✅ Пишите @pora_rasslabitsa_ask
Женщины и гормоны. Часть II
Что происходит с организмом женщины после оргазма? Мы рассмотрим счастливую, довольную особь, у которой великолепно прошёл день, а партнер так включился в процесс, что она улетела на небеса. Идеальную ситуацию, короче.
Так вот в этой смоделированной ситуации женщины получают выброс дофамина, окситоцина и опиатов в очень больших количествах. По сути у нас получается наркоманка в кровати, …
2000 км ради обучения — это много или мало?
Примерно столько преодолела моя последняя ученица по расслабляющему массажу. Как мужчина, я предпочитаю считать, что только ради меня. Это, конечно, не так, но кто мне запретит?
Провели всё в максимально позитивном и продуктивном ключе. Рад, что девушка уехала с новыми навыками и, надеюсь, будет практиковать их на партнёре. Даже оставила такой милый отзыв.
Записаться ко …
Женщины и гормоны. Часть I
Не буду писать про «всего 3 дня в месяц спокойного гормонального фона». Об этом уже как будто все знают. Расскажу про чудеса женского оргазма.
Если вы в течение дня где-то проштрафились перед своей дамой, то вероятность качественного секса в разы снижается. Возбуждение у женщин напрямую связано с головой из-за нервной системы. В их конфигурации больше нервных окончаний, которые получают с…
Спасение от целлюлита: набираю фокус-группу
Если вы устали от впадин на своих бёдрах/животе/руках. Если готовы признать, что обёртывание и спорт вам ничем не помогли. То пора записаться на массаж.
5 сеансов антицеллюлитного массажа.
Фото до/после каждого сеанса.
Замеры на каждом этапе, чтобы доказать эффект.
Фокус-группа идёт на массаж со скидкой — 15.000₽ вместо 20.000₽. Платёж можно разбить на 2 части. За это вс…
Все скучают по 2007, потому что там трахались чаще
Это чисто моя гипотеза. Судите сами, по статистике рождаемость начала резко снижаться после 2007 года. Эксперты срастили это с развитием технологий.
Изменилось общение, стало меньше офлайн-коммуникации. В последние годы люди все дольше ищут спутника по жизни, потому что пытаются найти запретграмовский идеал.
Вот и думайте теперь. А лучше не думайте — присоединяйте…
Хочется и колется
Сейчас работаю с командой над дизайном и искренне стараюсь не свалиться в похожу историю, как у IRNBY. С одной стороны, задолбала табуированность. С другой — очень не хочется читать про мерзость. Мы ж про любовь.
Как вы считаете, тело должно продолжать быть скрытым или пора вернуться к «голым» истокам?
Немного об ответственности за самое сокровенное
Оргазм. Кто должен о нём заботиться и как его достичь? Вы не поверите, но это совместный проект двух партнёров. Если вы не знаете, как получаете оргазм обычно, то и партнёр вам Америку не откроет.
Как это работает: вы заранее проговариваете свои эрогенные зоны, точки возбуждения и при необходимости изучаете свои реакции на прикосновения. Это можно сделать безопасно на…
💯5❤2custom 54584644231338486292
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @porarasslabitsa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 181,426 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пора расслабиться | Искусство массажа🔞” (@porarasslabitsa), 2,055 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/porarasslabitsa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.